Famous quotes

"Happiness can be defined, in part at least, as the fruit of the desire and ability to sacrifice what we want now for what we want eventually" - Stephen Covey

Showing posts with label ICAI Journal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ICAI Journal. Show all posts

Saturday, June 06, 2026

ICAI Journal Jun 2026

 

The MSME Growth Engine: Navigating Opportunities, Challenges, and the Role of CA in the Era of AI and Viksit Bharat 2047

CA. Mukul Lamba Member of the Institute

The Strategic Paradigm of India’s MSME Sector in 2026

Consider a manufacturer of hosiery based out of Ludhiana, Punjab, a skilled fabric knitter from Coimbatore, and a small-batch tea estate in Upper Assam. During the times of the old economy, these businesses were home-grown players striving to survive against exorbitant costs and intermediaries.

In the era of Viksit Bharat 2047, the concept of “small” businesses no longer exists; they are now referred to as Micro-Multinationals. Any business with a revenue of ₹100 crore in a Tier-2 city now boasts of international reach and data insights, driven by Artificial Intelligence (AI) and steered by strategic CA advisory.

The path traversed by the Indian economy in 2026 is principally defined by the strength of the MSME sector. As India advances toward its 100th year of independence, the sector has transformed into the buttress of industrial propulsion. In FY 2025-26, the sector contributes approximately 31.1% of national GDP and 35.4% of manufacturing yield. With over 7.47 crore enterprises employing nearly 38.82 crore individuals, it is the second-largest employer after agriculture. India’s real GDP is projected to grow at 7.4% in FY26, with manufacturing GVA surging 9.13% in recent quarters.

Viksit Bharat 2047: Ideological Pillars and the MSME Mandate

The mission to transform India into a developed, self-reliant nation is built on four fundamental pillars:

  1. Youth (Yuva): MSMEs serve as laboratories for entrepreneurship, absorbing the demographic dividend into high-tech manufacturing.
  2. Poor (Garib): The sector offers social mobility through localized employment at low capital cost.
  3. Women (Mahilayen): The 2025-26 budget targets 70% participation of women in economic activities, with credit guarantee covers for women-led units enhanced to 90%.
  4. Farmers (Annadata): Food processing MSMEs (supported by a ₹10,900 crore PLI outlay) facilitate value addition to make India the “food basket of the world”.

With India aiming to become a $30 trillion to $35 trillion economy by 2047, MSME contribution is expected to surge to 50% of GDP and 60% of exports.

Understanding the Economic Magnitude

  • Current GDP Contribution (2026): MSMEs contribute roughly ₹100 lakh crore to a ₹320 lakh crore ($4 trillion) economy.
  • The Funding Gap: Despite formalization, a credit gap of approximately ₹30 lakh crore remains.
  • Government Allocation: The Union Budget 2026-27 earmarked over ₹22,000 crore for the Ministry of MSME, including a ₹10,000 crore SME Growth Fund.
  • The 2047 Vision: By 2047, MSMEs are expected to manage an economic value exceeding ₹1,200 lakh crore.

The Roadmap to Viksit Bharat 2047

PillarObjectiveFinancial Target (Estimated)
FormalizationMove more micro-units to the Udyam portal.Unlock higher opportunities in formal credit.
Technology HubsEstablish AI-Common Facility Centers.Reduce tech-adoption costs by 60%.
Export ScalingLink MSMEs to global e-commerce.Boost opportunities for MSME exports.
Skill TransformationReskill 10 million workers in AI-collaboration.Increase labor productivity by 3x.

The Regional Powerhouses in INR Terms

The roadmap to $30 trillion is paved by regional clusters:

  • Punjab’s Manufacturing: In Ludhiana, AI-driven predictive maintenance is saving units over ₹50 lakh annually in repair costs.
  • Coimbatore’s Textile Tech: Modern looms using AI reduce fabric wastage by 12%, adding ₹1.5 crore to the annual bottom line of exporters.
  • Assam’s Tea Renaissance: AI-powered soil analysis and forecasting are increasing yields by 20%, keeping the ₹20,000 crore industry competitive.

The Role of CA in the Era of AI and Viksit Bharat 2047

The CA has shifted from a conventional auditor to an “engineers of progress,” acting as the “General Surgeon” of an MSME's financial health.

A. From Compliance to Strategic Advisory: CAs now perform Data-Driven Business Modeling. Using AI, they provide “What-If” analyses regarding production increases and debt-service coverage. B. The ESG Sentinel: CAs are now authorized to certify carbon footprints and labor practices, ensuring MSMEs access the ₹80 lakh crore global green market. C. AI Governance and Ethical Audit: The mandate includes auditing AI models to ensure financial data security and compliance with the Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act.

Additional roles include:

  • The Valuation Expert: Furnishing real-time valuations via AI.
  • The ESG Auditor: Auditing emissions to allow "Carbon Neutral" branding at a 40% premium.
  • Financial Shield: Conducting digital audits to safeguard against online frauds costing ~₹25 lakh per incident.

Audit Automation and Initiatives

CAs are encouraged to use agentic workflows to automate auditing labor, moving toward reporting automation and tracking ROI.

  • ICAI MSME Clinic: Launched across 183 branches, these clinics provide weekly pro-bono advisory on finance, GST, and technology, acting as credit matchmakers.
  • Addressing Liquidity: Approximately ₹10.7 lakh crore is locked in delayed payments annually. Section 43B(h) of the Income Tax Act (effective April 1, 2024) enforces payment discipline.
  • Transition to MSME ODR: Since October 15, 2025, all delayed payment applications are filed on the Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) Portal for resolution within 90 to 180 days.

AI: The Catalyst for “Non-Linear” Growth

AI is now a fundamental factor of production.

  • Hyper-Efficiency: IoT sensors and predictive maintenance avoid breakdowns costing ₹5–10 lakh annually.
  • Democratized Marketing: AI enables rural MSMEs to sell directly to global markets via ONDC, handling localization and logistics.
  • Intelligent Credit: AI-enabled Cash Flow Lending uses GST returns and digital data to grant collateral-free loans within minutes. By 2035, AI is estimated to contribute $135.6 billion to $149.9 billion to MSME value creation.

The IMPACT AI Framework for Adoption

This World Economic Forum framework organizes actions into three pillars:

  1. Awareness: Utilizing AI Experience Centres and Sandboxes.
  2. Action: Using the AI Maturity Index and AI Solutions Marketplace.
  3. Recognition: Celebrating AI Pioneers to create blueprints for others.

Challenges: Navigating the Storm

  • Digital Divide: 40% of rural units still struggle with high-speed internet and basic digital bookkeeping.
  • Cost of Transition: Infrastructure upgrades are daunting for micro-enterprises.
  • Cybersecurity: A single breach can cost a small unit ₹50 lakh, often leading to permanent closure.
  • Reskilling: The need to train 10 million workers to work alongside AI.

Conclusion: The Lion Awakens

By 2047, the contrast between “small” and “large” business will be blurred by technology. A minor unit in a Tier-3 city, powered by AI and a technologically adept CA, will have the competencies of a multinational. The MSME Growth Engine is no longer just about survival; it is about dominance, transforming the Indian spirit of “Jugaad” into a global standard of “Innovation and Excellence”.

Author may be reached at mukullamba62@gmail.com and eboard@icai.in.


MSMEs in India: Engines of Innovation and Economic Transformation

Contributed by MSME and Start-up Committee of ICAI

Introduction

The adage perfectly describes Indian businesses: A skilled sailor doesn’t wait for the wind; he creates his own course. Small dreams that turn into businesses have navigated global uncertainties and difficult situations to strengthen the nation’s economy over decades. The businesses have also received measured governmental support. Entrepreneurial resilience and these things have further propelled businesses and contributed to the country’s economic stability.

MSMEs stands as the acronym for Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises which form the backbone of the Indian economy, a term which evolved from the early industrial regulatory framework under the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act and was later crystallised through the MSME Development Act, 2006. Recently, the government redefined MSMEs by updating investment and turnover thresholds, reflecting the sector’s transformation and its growing integration with digital markets.

Today, the numbers speak compellingly for Indian enterprise. MSMEs contribute roughly 30% of India’s GDP, account for nearly 45% of manufacturing output, contribute close to 46–48% of India’s total exports, and employ over 37.50 crore people, making them the largest employment generator in the country after agriculture. As of 27th May 2026, 8.47 Cr enterprises have registered on the Udyam Registration Portal (URP) and the initiative of Udyam Assist Platform (UAP) launched by the government is a testament to the ease of doing business and the formalisation of India’s informal economy. Parallel to this, India’s startup ecosystem has surged to approximately 230,000 DPIIT-recognised startups with 23.36 lacs approx. job creation as of May 2026, with over 130 unicorns, third globally, demonstrating world-class innovation and attracting substantial foreign investment.

Indian businesses are increasingly adopting best trading practices, accounting standards compliance, e-invoicing, GST-driven transparency, and supply-chain digitisation, making the ecosystem investor-ready. Indeed, investors are choosing India for its macro-stability, large domestic market, policy predictability, and a startup culture that blends frugality with ambition. Moreover, the sector is pivoting toward green practices: solar-powered units, energy-efficient production, and circular-economy models are becoming the norm.

Digitalisation under initiatives like Digital India, TReDS, the Udyam Assist Platform, and the Open Network for Digital Commerce (ONDC) has democratised market access, enabling even the smallest enterprises to trade nationally and globally. Through the Make in India initiative launched in 2014 and the “Vocal for Local” movement, India is manufacturing everything from smartphones and electronics to defence equipment and renewable-energy components, reducing import dependence while boosting exports. Complementing this, the Production Linked Incentive Scheme (PLI) provides performance-based incentives to boost large-scale manufacturing, enhance exports, and strengthen India’s competitiveness in global supply chains. The renaissance of modernity, rooted in civilisational commerce and propelled by technology and sustainability, affirms India’s position as a global manufacturing and trading powerhouse.

With its vast demographic dividend, India is harnessing its population, particularly its youth and skilled professionals, at peak efficiency. The nation has emerged as a premier outsourcing hub, driven by IT and IT-enabled services, business process management, accounting services, engineering R&D, knowledge process outsourcing, and increasingly, cloud services, digital marketing, and back-office operations. What sets India apart are the practices it has adopted: globally standardised service delivery models, ISO-certified quality processes, strong data security frameworks, seamless digital infrastructure, and a talent pool fluent in multiple languages and global business norms. These practices, combined with cost competitiveness, 24/7 service delivery, and a strong IP protection regime, have made India the preferred destination for foreign multinationals seeking reliable, high-quality services.

Fortune favours the bold, but it would not be wrong to admit that the sweet fruit which is favouring India’s economic ecosystem is the relentless effort by both the government and entrepreneurs who are burning the midnight oil in making it achievable. These schemes are proof that the challenges in India shall be faced with a more power-backed approach. Recognising MSMEs as the backbone of India’s economic fabric, the government has rolled out a comprehensive ecosystem of schemes designed to fuel entrepreneurship. The Credit Guarantee Scheme for Micro and Small Enterprises (CGS) now offers guarantee coverage up to 90% for loans up to ₹10 crore, enabling an additional credit of ₹2 lakh crore at reduced cost. This would not only provide financial help to budding entrepreneurs but would also give them the confidence to boost their businesses.

Schemes Favouring the Entrepreneur Ecosystem in India

Key government initiatives to support MSMEs and startups include:

  • Startup India Initiative
  • Raising and Accelerating MSME Performance (RAMP): Launched in June 2022 with a total outlay of ₹6,062.45 crore (2022–27), targeting approximately 5.55 lakh beneficiaries by expanding access to finance, markets, technology, and green practices.
  • Digital Interventions: Including the SAMADHAAN Portal and the newly launched Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) Portal to ensure timely payment settlements.
  • MSME Champions Scheme: Drives technology upgradation and common facility centres.
  • Self-Reliant India (SRI) Fund: Infuses ₹50,000 crore equity into MSMEs.
  • PM Vishwakarma: Offers holistic support to 18 traditional artisanal trades, including formal recognition, skill upgradation with stipends, ₹15,000 toolkit e-vouchers, and collateral-free loans up to ₹3 lakh at 5%.
  • Prime Minister's Employment Generation Programme (PMEGP): Provides credit-linked subsidies (up to 35%) for setting up new micro-enterprises in the non-farm sector.
  • Trade Receivables Discounting System (TReDS): Facilitates electronic financing of trade receivables.
  • Startup-specific funds: Including the Fund of Funds for Startups (FFS) (₹10,000 crore) and the Startup India Seed Fund Scheme (SISFS).

This confluence of policy support, financial access, and institutional guidance is nurturing a pool of skilled professionals and ambitiously positioning India to generate its own "Big 4," making the dream of globally competitive Indian multinationals not so distant.

Legal and Policy Framework Strengthening Indian Business

The government's strategy is backed by laws and regulations that make it firmer and investor-ready.

  • MSME Development Act, 2006: Provides priority sector lending mandates and delayed payment protection.
  • Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime: Simplified compliance via composition schemes and threshold exemptions.
  • Startup India Recognition Framework: Grants legal identity through DPIIT recognition, enabling tax exemptions and holidays.
  • SME Listing Platforms: NSE EMERGE and BSE SME have seen over 1,400 SMEs listed, raising thousands of crores.
  • Regulatory Reforms: The Companies (Amendment) Act, 2020, and SEBI (ICDR) Regulations, 2021, have eased exit norms and enabled easier listing.
  • ESG and Data Governance: SEBI’s Business Responsibility and Sustainability Reporting (BRSR) framework (2021) and the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, establish transparency and data protection norms.

Role of Chartered Accountants in Nurturing MSMEs and Startups

Chartered Accountants act as the bridge between policies, laws, and people, serving as the best advisors for business growth. Their role has evolved from being primarily financial-focused to acting as strategic partners who:

  • Drive AI adoption in business processes.
  • Guide ESG integration and advise on BRSR frameworks.
  • Facilitate SME IPO listings and promote green practices.
  • Prepare investor-ready financials and conduct due diligence for structured deals.
  • Ensure international accounting standards compliance for global scaling.

ICAI: Partner in Nation-Building

Through its dedicated MSME & Startup Committee, ICAI has strengthened the landscape via progressive initiatives.

A. MSME and Startup Yatras The ICAI MSME Yatra 2022 and the 2024 edition (covering 20,000 km across 100 cities in 100 days) facilitated thousands of Udyam and DPIIT registrations and provided expert guidance on business setup, compliance, and finance.

B. Pan-India MSME Empowerment Drive (2025)

  • ICAI MSME Mahotsav: Held on 27 June 2025 across nearly 140 branches, providing grassroots support to 20,000 MSMEs through 400 helpdesks.
  • ICAI MSME Startup Conclave: Mumbai event bringing together 3,000 delegates and resulting in funding for several startups.
  • ICAI MSME Connect: Strategic meet in New Delhi focusing on digital transformation and policy.
  • ICAI MSME Clinic: Launched in December 2025, providing weekly pro-bono advisory on finance, technology, and compliance across ICAI branches.
  • Strategic Partnerships: MoUs with NPCI Bharat BillPay, IIT Delhi (FITT), and various state governments to promote digitisation and mentorship.

C. ICAI’s 2026 Roadmap

  • All India MSME Associations Meet (April 2026): Focused on financial inclusion and access to credit.
  • SME Fund Raising Conclave (Indore): Explored funding alternatives like SME IPOs and venture capital.
  • MSME Manthan Meet 2026 (Shimla): A residential meet with Ministry officials to address grassroots hurdles and utilize government incentives.

Conclusion

As Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam stated, “Dream is not that which you see while sleeping, it is something that does not let you sleep.” Today, India epitomises this vision. The nation is progressively surfacing as a global champion shaping the future economy. The profession remains steadfast in reinforcing businesses through professional acumen and prudent guidance, as India moves toward emerging as a Vishwaguru.


The Importance of the Foreign Exchange Management Act [FEMA], 1999 in India

CA. Shweta Choraria Member of the Institute

Introduction

In today’s era of rapid globalization, digital payments, and high-volume cross-border transactions, FEMA plays a very important role in facilitating international trade, managing foreign exchange reserves and maintaining the stability of the Indian currency. From the perspective of Chartered Accountants (CAs) in Practice in India, developing expertise in this field and providing consultancy services to clients engaged in multinational businesses is a welcoming and rewarding opportunity. Recognizing the growing importance of this domain, ICAI has been continuously encouraging its members by organizing Certificate Courses on FEMA and regularly updating them on recent changes and their impact on the Indian economy.

What is FEMA, 1999?

FEMA, 1999, is an Indian law enacted to regulate the flow of foreign currency, manage foreign exchange, and ensure monetary stability in the Indian economy. It covers all transactions, including capital account and current account transactions, as well as the scope of Foreign Direct Investments (FDI) and External Commercial Borrowings (ECB). The Act empowers the Central Government to frame rules and the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to issue regulations for managing foreign exchange to facilitate external trade and maintain a stable forex market. Essentially, the Central Government sets the policy framework, while the RBI regulates authorized dealers and oversees foreign exchange transactions.

Top 10 Positive Impacts of FEMA, 1999, on the Indian Economy

  1. Focus on Economic Stability & Forex Management: FEMA focuses on maintaining economic stability by regulating capital flows and ensuring that cross-border transactions do not negatively impact the balance of payments. It promotes the orderly development and maintenance of the forex market.
  2. Welcoming Foreign Investment: FEMA is designed to facilitate external trade and actively encourage foreign direct investment (FDI) to boost growth. By providing clear, transparent guidelines for FDI and Foreign Portfolio Investment (FPI), it attracts foreign investors, boosting India’s GDP and capital reserves.
  3. Positive Response to Businesses and Start-Ups: By reducing constraints on foreign exchange, it makes it easier to do business internationally. FEMA Valuation guidelines prevent startups from giving away equity below fair value, protecting stakeholders. Adherence also helps businesses maintain a positive legal reputation essential for attracting investors.
  4. Liberalization in Trade Practices: FEMA generally allows transactions unless they are expressly prohibited, reversing the restrictive principle of its predecessor, FERA. It classifies most violations as civil offenses rather than criminal acts, significantly liberalizing trade.
  5. Shifting from Regulation to Management: The shift from the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA), 1973, to FEMA represents a foundational transformation from a regime of strict control and conservation to one of management and facilitation. Under FEMA, foreign exchange is treated as an economic asset to be managed for development rather than a scarce resource to be controlled.
  6. More than Law, it works like an Eco-System: FEMA forms the foundation of India’s foreign exchange ecosystem, balancing national interests with the need to attract investment and comply with global standards. It continues to evolve to meet changing economic needs and global trends.
  7. Boost Foreign Investment: By liberalizing transactions and creating a conducive regulatory environment, FEMA encourages trade and investment that directly or indirectly contributes to economic growth.
  8. Enhancing Investor Confidence: A transparent and predictable regulatory framework enhances investor confidence, attracting more foreign capital into India.
  9. Sector-Specific Regulations: FEMA prescribes FDI caps and approval routes (automatic or government) based on industry type to regulate inflows and maintain stability. It also specializes in regulations for E-commerce regarding cybersecurity to protect digital assets.
  10. Shifting from Criminal to Civil Penalties: Markedly different from the restrictive criminal-based regime of FERA, FEMA's civil-based facilitative framework promotes trade and investment by managing foreign exchange as an economic asset.

Compliances and Documentations under FEMA, 1999

Main compliances include mandatory reporting of foreign investments and transactions to the RBI through AD Category-I banks. Key requirements include:

  • Filing the Annual Return on Foreign Liabilities and Assets (FLA).
  • Reporting FDI via Form FC-GPR/FC-TRS.
  • Filling the Entity Master Form.
  • Monthly ECB-2 filings.
  • Adhering to LRS limits for outward remittances.
  • Complying with downstream investment rules for subsidiaries.
  • Filing the Annual Performance Report (APR) for Overseas Direct Investment (ODI).
  • Reporting investments in Foreign Joint Ventures (JV) or Wholly Owned Subsidiaries (WOS).
  • Reporting individual foreign exchange withdrawals daily via CIMS for AD banks.
  • Ensuring export proceeds are realized and returned within specific timeframes.
  • Maintaining records like the Foreign Inward Remittance Certificate (FIRC) and ensuring KYC compliance.
  • Filing Form 15CA/15CB with authorized banks.
  • Registering for an Import Export Code (IEC).

Basic Points to be Considered under FEMA, 1999

  • Retaining Resident Accounts: NRI status (staying outside India for >182 days) requires immediate conversion of Resident Savings Accounts to Non-Resident Ordinary (NRO) accounts. Maintaining a resident account as an NRI is a common violation.
  • Using NRE Account after Returning: Continuing to operate a Non-Resident External (NRE) account for Indian income after returning to India permanently is a violation.
  • Crypto/Prohibited Investments: Using Liberalised Remittance Scheme (LRS) funds for crypto-assets or prohibited items is treated as an LRS breach.
  • Splitting Remittances: Exceeding the annual $250,000 limit by using multiple banks to hide the cumulative total is a violation.
  • Filing Errors: Non-filing or incorrect filing constitutes a violation.

Important Monetary Limits under FEMA, 1999

  • Liberalised Remittance Scheme (LRS): Residents can remit up to USD 250,000 per financial year for authorized purposes.
  • Repatriation for NRIs/PIOs: Can repatriate up to USD 1 million per financial year from NRO accounts (income/sale proceeds).
  • Educational Expenses: Allowed up to the institution's estimate or USD 100,000 per academic year, whichever is higher.
  • Medical Treatment: Permitted up to the doctor/hospital estimate or within the LRS limit.
  • Gifts and Donations: Remittances are covered under the USD 250,000 LRS limit.

FEMA and RBI Compliances: Core Reporting Requirements

RequirementApplicable FormsTimelineRegulating Authority
FDI ReportingFC-GPR, FC-TRS30-60 daysRBI
Overseas InvestmentForm FCOn or before ODI remittanceRBI
APR for ODIForm APRAnnualRBI
Import PaymentsA2 Form, KYCBefore sending paymentAD Bank
Export of Goods/ServicesSOFTEX Form, GR FormPeriodic (project/invoice based)RBI/SEZ Authority

Some Recent Actions of the Government Related to FEMA, 1999

  1. Export/Import Regulation: In November 2025, the RBI extended the export proceed realization and repatriation time limit from 9 months to 15 months. Travelers to Nepal and Bhutan can now carry Indian currency notes up to ₹25,000 (excluding denominations above ₹100).
  2. FDI & Non-Debt Instruments (2025): Companies in FDI-prohibited sectors were permitted to issue bonus shares to existing non-residents if the shareholding pattern remains unchanged. Prior government approval for FDI from border-sharing nations was strictly enforced in 2025.
  3. LRS & Tax (2025-2026): Budget 2025 increased the TCS threshold for LRS remittances to ₹10 lakh per year. Remittances below this generally avoid TCS, and those for education via financial institution loans also do not attract TCS.
  4. Compounding and Compliance Procedures (2025): Applications must now be submitted via the RBI’s PRAVAAH portal. April 2025 amendments introduced a ₹2,00,000 cap for compounding minor or technical contraventions to ease compliance.
  5. Enforcement Actions (2025-2026): The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has intensified investigations into “front companies” and foreign NGOs. Notable cases include provisional attachment of assets worth ₹100.44 Crore in an illegal coal mining case, searches in Goa involving recovery of ₹2.25 Crore in cash and cryptocurrencies worth over ₹90 Lakh, and the seizure of 13 bank accounts of M/s Reliance Infrastructure Ltd. related to the siphoning of NHAI funds.
  6. Enhanced Reporting Monitoring: RBI upgraded the Single Master Form (SMF) system for auto-reconciliation and alerts, while reducing work duplication on the iFirm portal.

Role and Initiative taken by ICAI on FEMA, 1999

ICAI plays a vital role in administration, compliance, and education. It conducts specialized Certificate Courses, publishes handbooks like the “CAs’ Handbook on Inbound & Outbound Investments under FEMA,” and organizes webinars to help members navigate documentation and RBI guidelines.

FEMA: An Open Opportunity for Chartered Accountants (CAs)

Increasing cross-border transactions and investments offer significant career opportunities. Scope exists in:

  • Certifications required by AD Banks for remittances and capital transactions.
  • Client representations before the RBI for compounding and approvals.
  • Regulatory management roles in leading firms, particularly in Tax Advisory and Litigation.

Challenges under FEMA, 1999

  • The dynamic nature and frequent RBI circulars make compliance difficult, especially for smaller firms.
  • Significant delays can occur due to approval requirements and extensive documentation.
  • Unintentional non-compliance (e.g., clerical errors) can lead to severe penalties or unwinding of transactions.
  • Misuse of NRI bank accounts (NRE/NRO) and illegal property purchases remain common.
  • Penalties under the 1999 Act are very heavy.

Conclusion

FEMA’s flexible, transparent approach has been vital in inviting foreign investment and promoting the ease of doing business in India. However, it demands strict compliance with reporting and sector-specific restrictions. Under FEMA, what you cannot do directly, you cannot do indirectly either.

Important Government Websites

Based on the "Gist of Opinions" section (pages 1595–1600) of the source, here are the summaries of the Expert Advisory Committee (EAC) opinions provided in the June 2026 edition:


1. Capitalisation of Dry Dock Expenditure (Major Inspection Costs)

Subject: Capitalisation as a separate component of dredgers and depreciation after completion of their estimated useful lives.

Company’s Response to CAG Comments:

  • The Company argued that under Ind AS 16, subsequent costs can be capitalised and depreciated until the next scheduled dry-docking.
  • For dredgers with expired useful lives, the Company reviewed and extended those lives based on dry dock surveys, aligning with paragraph 51 of Ind AS 16.

Committee’s Points and Opinion:

  • The Committee noted that Ind AS 16 allows capitalization if it is probable that future economic benefits will flow to the entity and costs can be measured reliably.
  • Routine repairs, maintenance, and day-to-day servicing must be charged to profit or loss as incurred.
  • Not all dry-docking expenses meet the criteria; each item must be analyzed. However, if expenditure increases the expected utility/useful life, it meets recognition criteria.
  • Ind AS 16 does not prohibit subsequent expenditure capitalization even after the original useful life has expired, but the Company should review its manner of determining useful life.
  • If a component has a different useful life than the remainder of the asset, it must be depreciated separately.

2. Structured Package of Assistance for a Hardwood Pulp Plant

Subject: Whether a capital subsidy in lieu of SGST reimbursement is a ‘grant related to asset’ or a ‘grant related to income’ under Ind AS 20.

Committee’s Points and Opinion:

  • Ind AS 20 defines grants related to assets as those where the primary condition is the purchase, construction, or acquisition of a long-term asset.
  • Secondary conditions regarding the location or type of asset do not change this classification.
  • The Committee clarified that the frequency of the grant (one-time vs. regular) is irrelevant to determining its nature.
  • While the subsidy might be calculated as a percentage of investment, this is merely the basis for the amount and does not dictate the nature of the grant.

3. Payment to NHAI for Road Connectivity to Exhibition-cum-Convention Centre (ECC)

Subject: Accounting treatment of ₹354.89 crore paid to NHAI for external road connectivity to the ECC project.

Management’s Position:

  • Management argued the road infrastructure is critical to the operational readiness of the ECC; without it, the main asset is unusable. Therefore, they capitalised it under Ind AS 16.

Committee’s Points and Opinion:

  • The expenditure was for "connectivity" to a road, not a dedicated road for the project itself.
  • Under Ind AS 16, only costs directly attributable to bringing an asset to the location and condition necessary for operation can be capitalised.
  • The Committee noted the road and project development happened simultaneously, meaning the road was not strictly necessary for the construction of the ECC.
  • The objective was to create additional access to increase attractiveness and visitor ease, which may increase future benefits but is not necessary for the ECC to be "capable of operating".
  • Conclusion: The expenditure should not be capitalised as part of the PPE cost; instead, it should be recognized as an expense in the Statement of Profit and Loss when incurred.

Important General Notes:

  1. These gists are summarised versions for informational purposes and may not capture every nuance. Users should refer to the complete authoritative text at icai.org.
  2. The opinions represent the view of the EAC, not necessarily the Council of the Institute.
  3. Each opinion is based on specific facts provided by the querist and current laws at the time of finalisation.
  4. A Compendium of Opinions in forty-four volumes is available for purchase via the ICAI CDS Portal.

Accountant’s Browser

PROFESSIONAL NEWS & VIEWS PUBLISHED ELSEWHERE Index of some useful articles taken from Periodicals received during April – May 2026 for the reference of Faculty/Students & Members of the Institute.

1. Audit

  • Auditor-Client Relationship and Abnormal Tone: A Simultaneous Equations Approach by Milad Darvishi, Mahmoud Lari Dashtbayaz, Roghayeh Mahmoudi Yekebaghi and Taqi Abdul Redha AI Abdwani. Asian Review of Accounting, V. 34, No. 2, PP. 273-297.

2. Computer

  • Employees Are Relying on AI for Personal Support. That’s Risky by Constance Noonan Hadley and Sarah L. Wright. Harvard Business Review, May-June 2026, PP. 67-75.
  • How Gen AI Robots are Reshaping Services by Jochen Wirtz. Harvard Business Review, May-June 2026, PP. 117-125.
  • Strategic Impact of AI on Bank CRM: Applications, Benefits and Future Governance by S. Jeyakumar. Banking Finance, April 2026, PP. 37-43.

3. Economics

  • Horticulture Sector in India: Trends, Performance, and Impact by Sant Kumar, Anjani Kumar, Nalini Ranjan Kumar, Kriti Sharma and Immanuelraj Kingsly. Economic & Political Weekly, April 25, 2026, PP. 42-49.
  • Innovation as the Driver of Economic Growth: India’s Roadmap to 2047 by Bimlesh Kumar Singh and Saifullah Khan. University News, April 20-26, 2026, PP. 26-36.
  • Mind over money: How Psychology Shapes your Financial Fate by Soumya Ranjan Sahoo and Sunil Kumar Gaud. Banking Finance, April 2026, PP. 29-32.
  • West Asia War: What it Means for Exporters, Importers and Marine Insurance by Balasundaram R. Insurance Times, April 2026, PP. 35-37.

4. Taxation and Finance

  • Performance Commitment, Earnings Quality and Tax Avoidance: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies by Xiaoqing Li, Haiyu Yan and Zixing Wang. Asian Review of Accounting, V. 34, No. 2, 2026, PP. 483-509.

Note: Full texts of the above articles are available with the Central Council library, ICAI, which can be referred on all working days. For further inquiries, please contact 011-30110419 and 011-30110420 or by e-mail at library@icai.in.


Mergers and Acquisitions: Transforming the Global Business Landscape 2026-2030

CA. Neha Sedhara Member of the Institute

Overview and Strategic Necessity

Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) have evolved from simple tools for expansion into strategic necessities in the globalized market of 2026. The period between 2026 and 2030 is set to witness transformative shifts driven by technological innovation, regulatory reforms, and sustainability. While M&A serves as a primary tool for consolidation, it is increasingly used to drive innovation and navigate the complexities of the future global business environment.

Historical Context and India’s Rise

India has recorded a massive trajectory in the M&A space, with over 28,500 deals since 1996, totaling a cumulative value exceeding $1.06 trillion. The year 2025 marked a significant rebound, with deal values reaching approximately $60.2 billion across 960+ transactions. This surge was primarily driven by high-value, billion-dollar deals and increased inbound interest in sectors like infrastructure, technology, and BFSI.

Technological Transformation

Technology, specifically Artificial Intelligence (AI), blockchain, and digital tools, has become a central driver of the M&A process. AI is used to streamline operations, automate repetitive tasks, and accelerate due diligence through advanced data analysis. Notably, Generative AI is projected to be utilized in 80% of M&A processes within the next three years, a massive jump from 16% in early 2024.

Landmark M&A Deals (2020-2025)

Several high-profile deals have reshaped the global landscape:

  • Microsoft – Activision Blizzard (2022): At $68.7B, this historic deal gave Microsoft massive scale in gaming and essential access to the metaverse ecosystem.
  • Reliance – Disney Merger (2024): A $8.5B consolidation creating "JioHotstar," commanding 120 TV channels and 280 million subscribers, capturing over 85% of the OTT market in India.
  • AMD – Xilinx (2022): A $35B deal that elevated AMD into a full-stack semiconductor player.
  • Tata Motors – Iveco (2025): A $4.4–4.5B acquisition that provides Tata Motors with strong access to Europe and Latin America while accelerating its entry into EV and hydrogen technologies.

Sectoral Spotlights: Pharma and Cement

  1. Pharmaceuticals: Indian trends are converging with global benchmarks. Mankind Pharma’s acquisition of Bharat Serums & Vaccines (2024) for ₹13,768 Cr mirrors the strategic rationale of global giants like Pfizer (Arena Pharma acquisition), moving from pipeline-driven bets to portfolio-driven dominance in specialty areas like women's health and fertility.
  2. Cement: The Adani Group is aggressively challenging market leader UltraTech Cement. By acquiring Penna Cement for ₹10,422 Crore, Adani Cement is on track to hit its target of 140 MTPA by FY2028, aiming for a 20% market share. UltraTech, however, remains the leader with a 23% share and plans to expand beyond 160 MTPA.

Hurdles, Legal Challenges, and the Role of Chartered Accountants

M&A transactions are fraught with regulatory and operational complexities where CAs play a pivotal role:

  • Regulatory Compliance: CAs navigate domestic laws (Companies Act, 2013) and cross-border requirements like FEMA and multi-jurisdictional antitrust reviews.
  • Taxation: Structuring deals to optimize Capital Gains Tax, managing Stamp Duty variations, and leveraging Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements (DTAAs) are essential functions.
  • Emerging Risks: Integrating ESG compliance, managing GDPR and data localization laws, and ensuring robust cybersecurity during IT integration have become modern priorities.

Emerging Trends and 2030 Projections

  • Sustainability: M&A in clean energy will accelerate to meet the global goal of 500 GW clean capacity by 2030.
  • India as a Global Hub: Supported by regulatory stability and policy continuity, India is projected to maintain M&A transaction values in the range of $65–75 billion in 2026, becoming a hub for strategic global investments.
  • Future Outlook: Key trends include a rise in cross-border collaborations, a heavy focus on ESG integration, and the expansion of private equity in early-stage firms.

Sector-wise Share of M&A (2025-26 Estimate)

SectorVolume Share
IT / Technology24%
Industrials / Manufacturing15%
Utilities / Power / Renewable13%
Healthcare / Pharma10%
Financial Services9%
Consumer Goods / FMCG8%
Telecom / Infrastructure7%
Others14%

(Source: Author's estimate)


Conclusion: M&A will remain central to corporate growth and innovation through 2030. India’s dynamic market, bolstered by proactive policies and professional expertise, will play a pivotal role in this global transformation.



Wednesday, May 06, 2026

CA Journal May2026

 

Digital Transformation in Public Financial Management: A Report on Governance, Integrity, and Technology

CA. (Dr.) R. S. Murali

Introduction

Public Financial Management (PFM) serves as the engine room of the modern state. It is the essential operational framework for collecting, allocating, and accounting for public resources, sustaining the social contract between the state and its citizens. When PFM systems fail, the foundation of governance itself erodes. This article addresses the urgent need to transform PFM using information technology, focusing on the digitisation and digital transformation aspects rather than PFM in isolation.

Imperative for Digitisation

The global community currently faces a significant integrity crisis. International Monetary Fund (IMF) models estimate annual global losses of approximately US $4.5 trillion—nearly 5% of world GDP—due to the inefficient use of public funds within public financial systems. Roughly US $1.7 trillion of this loss occurs at the budgetary central government level. Traditional paper-based systems are structurally incapable of mitigating these risks as they lack immutable, verifiable audit trails. Digital PFM is no longer an optional upgrade but a structural requirement for fiscal stability and public trust.

The Landscape of Government Digital Maturity in 2025

As of 2025, digital maturity is defined by "meaningful participation"—the ability of a state to deliver essential services through sophisticated, integrated platforms. The World Bank’s GovTech Maturity Index (GTMI) 2025 shows a global average increase to 0.589, up from 0.552 in 2022. However, a widening gap exists between high-maturity (Group A) and low-maturity (Group D) economies. While advanced states integrate frontier indicators like AI Ethics and Green Tech, developing nations often struggle with legacy system inertia.

Table 1: Digital Maturity Indicators - 2025

IndicatorStrategic FocusGlobal Status 2025
AI Ethics & GovernanceEthical utilization of automated decision-making and bias mitigation.70% of government bodies are piloting or planning AI use.
Green Tech PoliciesIntegration of environmental sustainability into digital architecture.High correlation with Group A maturity.
Digital Identity (ID)Seamless authentication using National Digital IDs.Fundamental to "whole-of-government" approaches.
Cloud-Based PFMSecure cloud enclaves replacing fragmented legacy servers.Essential for real-time monitoring and data integrity.

Key Issues in Digital Transformation

Technology is not an unbiased instrument; it engages directly with organizational law and social fairness. Several perspectives must be considered:

  • Legal/Administrative Perspective: "Blackbox" algorithms challenge judicial review, which depends on understanding decision-making logic. To alleviate this, authorities should adopt a "duty of candour," elucidating system logic and potential prejudice before legal proceedings.
  • Social Perspective: A technological gap leaves nearly 2.6 billion individuals offline, risking new types of alienation. Addressing this requires moving beyond traditional infrastructure to FinTech and Telecom collaborations (MNOs/MVNOs) to reach the underserved.
  • Ethical Perspective: The rise of "dark patterns"—manipulative UI/UX designs—erodes trust. A study of 53 Indian applications found 52 used deceptive tactics like interface interference or drip pricing.

Case Studies: Triumphs and Challenges

Global Triumphs:

  • Estonia: Uses KSI (Keyless Signature Infrastructure) Blockchain alongside its X-Road infrastructure to create tamper-proof government records for everything from tax filings to health data.
  • Singapore: Employs a whole-of-government approach to AI for real-time anomaly detection to identify procurement irregularities.

Global Challenges:

  • Moldova: A 2014 bank fraud siphoned 12% of GDP through shell companies, exposing weak digital oversight.
  • Toronto (Sidewalk Labs): A smart city project was shelved due to concerns over privacy and the political legitimacy of a private company controlling public policy and data.

India Triumphs:

  • UPI: A global leader, processing over 15 billion transactions monthly as of late 2024.
  • Kanpur GIS Mapping: tripling annual house tax revenue by using geocoding to identify unrecorded properties.
  • Aadhaar-Linked Payments: authenticating Direct Benefit Transfers (DBT), saving over US $1 billion in LPG subsidies alone.

India Challenges:

  • Systemic Exclusion: Technical failures in Aadhaar biometric authentication have occasionally denied essential food rations to vulnerable populations.
  • Cybersecurity: Aadhaar's centralized database has faced repeated security failures and data exposure risks.

Synthesis of Case Learnings: The 3PT Framework

Future reforms should be guided by a "3PT" framework: Policy, Process, People, and Technology.

  • Policy Perspective: Transformation requires comprehensive legislation for e-signatures, data privacy, and blockchain records to eliminate manual loopholes.
  • Process Perspective: Process Re-engineering (BPR) must occur before automation; automating manual inefficiencies is counterproductive. A phased, "test-and-learn" rollout using pilots is recommended.
  • People Perspective: Success requires a shift toward a data-driven culture and strategies to hire and retain specialist functional and IT talent using market-based salary scales.
  • Technology & AI Perspective: Governments should move from reactive monitoring to AI-driven predictive stewardship to detect fiscal stress and default patterns.

The Role of Accounting Professionals

In the era of AI, Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) is the final safeguard against judgmental atrophy. The accountant's role must evolve from bookkeeper to Digital Integrity Officer and Forensic AI Auditor. Professionals are critical for validating AI audit flags, ensuring the "auditability" of complex digital ledgers, and maintaining fiscal accuracy.

Conclusion

Digitisation is a structural necessity for modern governance. Success requires a balanced approach, pairing advanced technologies like Blockchain and AI Auditing with robust compliance mechanisms and predictive, data-driven stewardship.


The 16th Finance Commission and the Future of Local Self-Governments in India

V N Alok

Introduction

Local self-governments, both the Panchayats and the Municipalities, have a long history in India. While Panchayats have ancient roots, Municipalities have governed urban areas since the 17th century. Recognizing their primacy in providing basic services, the Constitution placed ‘local government’ in the State List of the Seventh Schedule. Until the 1993 Constitutional Amendments, the transfer of funds and functions to these bodies was largely ad hoc.

The 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendments (1993) formally recognized Panchayats and Municipalities as institutions of self-government, inserting Parts IX and IX A into the Constitution. This mandated State Legislatures to devolve functions and finances, creating the need for structured fund transfers as local expenditure typically exceeds generated revenue. Articles 243 I & Y necessitate every State to constitute a State Finance Commission (SFC) every five years to review these financial positions. Furthermore, Article 280 was amended to mandate the Union Finance Commission (UFC) to suggest measures to augment State Consolidated Funds to supplement the resources of these local bodies.

Union Finance Commission and Local Governments in the Past

Since 1993, seven UFCs have provided grants-in-aid to local governments.

  • 10th UFC: Recommended Rs. 100 per capita for the rural population (Rs. 4,381 crore) and Rs. 1,000 crore for Municipalities, totaling 1.38% of the Union divisible tax pool.
  • 11th & 12th UFCs: Successively increased grants by approximately three times each.
  • 13th UFC: Shifted from ad hoc grants to a percentage share of the divisible pool (1.42% for Panchayats; 0.51% for Municipalities).
  • 14th UFC: Reverted to ad hoc grants, providing Rs. 2,00,292 crore for Panchayats and Rs. 87,149 crore for Municipalities.

Over time, the importance assigned to urban governance has grown. The share of Municipalities in total local government grants has risen from 19% in the 10th UFC to 45% in the 16th UFC.

Recent Background for the 16th UFC

The 15th UFC (2021-26) proposed Rs. 2.37 lakh crore for Panchayats and Rs. 1.21 lakh crore for Municipalities. It introduced special grants (Rs. 70,000 crore) for primary healthcare due to COVID-19 and performance-linked grants for million-plus cities via a Challenge Fund. Eligibility for these grants required states to set up SFCs, follow their recommendations, and ensure local bodies published audited accounts online.

Transfers to Local Government by the 16th UFC

Under Prof. Arvind Panagariya, the 16th UFC has scaled up allocations to Rs. 4.35 lakh crore for Panchayats and Rs. 3.56 lakh crore for Municipalities for the five-year period starting April 1, 2026.

Key Targeted Municipal Components:

  • Urbanisation Premium (Rs. 10,000 crore): Supports planned rural-to-urban transitions by helping states build administrative structures in expanding areas.
  • Special Infrastructure Component (Rs. 56.1 thousand crore): Boosts wastewater management systems in 22 cities with populations between 1-4 million.

Both rural and urban grants are split 80:20 (Basic:Performance). Of the basic grant, 50% is tied to sanitation, waste, and water management. The remaining 50% and the entire performance grant are untied, though they cannot be used for salaries or establishment expenses.

Focus of UFCs on Good Accounting Practices

Successive commissions have driven reforms in financial reporting. The 14th UFC made submission of audited accounts a condition for performance grants, and the 15th UFC introduced mandatory online publication of both provisional and audited accounts. The 16th UFC continues these requirements while noting that more work is needed to ensure timely, exact audits.

Implications and Revenue Mobilisation

The 16th UFC has rebalanced basic grants to a 50:50 tied-untied ratio (from the 15th UFC's 60:40), giving local bodies more flexibility to address community-specific needs.

A major shift in the 16th UFC is linking performance grants to growth in Own Source Revenue (OSR) for both Panchayats and Municipalities.

  • Panchayats: Expected to increase OSR annually by a minimum of 2.5%.
  • Municipalities: Requirement is a 5% annual growth, emphasizing revenue from rent, holdings, and service fees.

Institutional Reforms: SFCs and Census

While UFCs are constitutionally required to base transfers on SFC reports, only six states (Assam, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Kerala, Tamil Nadu, and Rajasthan) had constituted their seventh SFC by 2024. The 16th UFC mandates that the Action Taken Report (ATR) must be tabled in the State Legislature within six months of receiving an SFC report to improve compliance.

Additionally, the 16th Census (begun April 2026) has frozen all administrative units until March 31, 2027. The resulting delimitation of constituencies may affect grant disbursal, requiring new arrangements for smooth fund transfers.

Conclusion

The 16th Finance Commission continues the trend of increased allocations coupled with a stronger accountability framework. Success depends on states complying with conditions such as regular local elections, publishing annual accounts, and providing a 20% matching contribution.

Key Future Directions:

  • Panchayats: Continuing advancement through the eGram Swaraj portal and the cash-based Model Accounting System (MAS).
  • Municipalities: Standardizing practices through the National Municipal Accounts Manual (NMAM) 2.0 in consultation with ICAI.
  • Legislative Needs: Successive UFCs have recommended raising the constitutional ceiling on professional tax (currently Rs. 2,500, last revised in 1988) and amending Article 285 to allow property tax on Union government properties.

When The Legislature Erases A Law - Do ‘Omissions’ Count as a ‘Repeal’ Under the General Clauses Act?

An Analysis Through the Lens of Proposed Omission of Section 13(8)(b) of the IGST Act, 2017 by the Finance Bill 2026 CA. Madhav Kumar Jha

Introduction

The Finance Act, 2026, has introduced a significant legal development under the Goods and Services Tax (GST) framework by omitting Section 13(8)(b) of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (IGST Act). This section previously governed the place of supply (POS) for intermediary services, setting it as the location of the supplier. This meant that Indian intermediaries serving foreign clients were often taxed domestically, excluding them from being considered an "export of services".

The omission of this provision causes the determination of POS to fall back upon the general provision in Section 13(2) of the IGST Act. Consequently, what was a taxable supply within India transforms into a zero-rated export of services, eligible for refunds of input tax credit or integrated tax paid. While this is a welcome liberalization, it triggers profound retrospective legal questions because the omission lacks a saving clause. This leaves the fate of eight years of pending proceedings, demands, and disputes uncertain.

Liberalisation Without a Safety Net: The Problem Section 13(8)(b) Leaves Behind

Intermediary classification has historically been complex and litigation-prone, depending entirely on the substance of the transaction. Tax authorities frequently applied the "intermediary" tag mechanically, shifting the POS to India and leading to the denial of GST refunds. While the 2026 amendment corrects this structural anomaly, the absence of a saving clause triggers a centuries-old common law doctrine regarding statutory erasure.

The Common Law Foundation and The General Clauses Act, 1897

Under common law, the Doctrine of Statutory Obliteration holds that when a provision is repealed or omitted, it is treated as if it had never been enacted. However, this does not disturb "transactions past and closed" that reached complete finality while the provision was in force.

For matters still in litigation, Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, provides a statutory saving mechanism. It stipulates that unless a "different intention" appears, a repeal shall not affect previous operations of the enactment, rights acquired, or legal proceedings already instituted. The critical debate is whether the word "omission" used in the Finance Act 2026 falls within the meaning of "repeal" as defined in Section 6.

The Four Pillars of the Debate: Journey Through Case Law

  1. Rayala Corporation (P) Ltd. v. Director of Enforcement (1969): A Constitution Bench held that Section 6 did not apply to an "omission" effected by a Ministry notification, categorically stating that "repeal" does not encompass "omissions".
  2. Kolhapur Canesugar Works Ltd. v. Union of India (2000): Another Constitution Bench affirmed that in the absence of a saving clause, all actions must stop where the repeal finds them, and that Section 6 does not automatically apply to the omission of a rule.
  3. M/S Fibre Boards (P) Ltd. v. CIT Bangalore (2015): A two-judge bench challenged prior precedents, noting that Section 6A of the General Clauses Act uses "repeal" to describe acts accomplished through "express omission". They argued the prior benches were per incuriam for not noticing Section 6A and held that express omission does indeed qualify as a repeal.
  4. Hikal Limited v. Union of India (Bombay High Court, 2025): This recent GST-related case held that Section 6 only responds to instruments carrying parliamentary authority (Acts or Regulations) and not to omissions made through subordinate legislation like Rules or notifications.

The Legal Landscape Today

The law currently operates on a bifurcation:

  • Subordinate Legislation: Pending proceedings generally lapse upon omission unless a saving clause exists, as seen in the Rayala, Kolhapur, and Hikal cases.
  • Central Acts: For provisions omitted through a Finance Act (like Section 13(8)(b)), the Fibre Boards analysis suggests Section 6 is attracted, meaning pending proceedings should survive.

However, a constitutional tension remains because the Fibre Boards decision was by a two-judge bench, whereas the cases it effectively overrides were decided by five-judge Constitution Benches.

The Second Side of the Coin

While the omission provides relief for service exporters, it creates new compliance consequences for Indian businesses receiving inbound intermediary services from abroad. Shifting the POS to the recipient’s location under Section 13(2) makes Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) liability unambiguous.

Conclusion

The implementation of this bare omission without a saving clause has opened a significant arena of legal uncertainty. Until a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court definitively determines whether "repeal" includes "express omission" for the purposes of Section 6, stakeholders must navigate an unsettled landscape. A savings clause in the Finance Act 2026 could have resolved this five-decade-old debate and prevented unnecessary litigation.


Gist of Opinions

(Expert Advisory Committee)

The May 2026 issue of The Chartered Accountant features several opinions from the Expert Advisory Committee (EAC) regarding complex accounting treatments under the Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS) framework.


1. Accounting Treatment under Ind AS 37 for Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) for End of Life of Vehicles

Facts of the Case: ABC Limited, a listed automotive manufacturer, prepares financial statements under Ind AS. The newly enacted Environment Protection (End-of-Life Vehicles) Rules, 2025 (ELV Rules) mandate that producers fulfill EPR obligations for vehicles introduced in the market by purchasing EPR certificates. This obligation continues even if the producer ceases operations and is linked to vehicles sold in the past 15 to 20 years. While related Environment Compensation (EC) Cess Rules and specific cost caps have not yet been notified, the querist argued that a present legal obligation exists as of April 1, 2025, due to past sales.

Queries:

  • What is the "obligating event" under Ind AS 37?
  • What is the correct accounting treatment for vehicle sales made from F.Y. 2005-06 (non-transport) and F.Y. 2010-11 (transport)?
  • Should cumulative provisioning for past sales be charged to the statement of profit and loss or adjusted against retained earnings?

Committee's Opinion:

  • Obligating Event: The Committee determined that the introduction of vehicles in earlier years becomes an obligating event only when the ELV Rules come into effect, creating a mandate for EPR targets on those past sales.
  • Reliable Estimate: Per Ind AS 37, except in extremely rare cases, an entity can determine a range of possible outcomes to make a reliable estimate of the obligation, even if some specific Cess Rules are pending notification.
  • Recognition: The company must recognize a provision as soon as the ELV Rules take effect for all already introduced vehicles.
  • P&L Treatment: Under Ind AS 1 (Presentation of Financial Statements), this provision must be charged to the Statement of Profit and Loss. Adjustment to retained earnings is inappropriate as this does not constitute a change in accounting policy or the correction of a prior-period error.

2. Change in Measurement Technique for Expected Credit Loss (ECL)

Facts and Query: The company proposed transitioning its ECL measurement model for financial assets/trade receivables from an "internal grid matrix" to a "scientific actuarial valuation". The querist viewed this as a fundamental shift in the measurement model and asked if it should be treated as a change in accounting policy requiring retrospective application.

Committee's Opinion: The Committee restricted its view to the transition itself rather than the specific calculations. It noted that for trade receivables, companies typically measure loss allowances at lifetime ECL under Ind AS 109. The Committee evaluated whether this shift qualifies as a change in accounting policy or a change in accounting estimate based on Ind AS 8 (Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors).


3. Classification of an Employee Family Benefit Scheme (EFBS)

Query: Whether a specific EFBS should be classified as a defined benefit scheme under Ind AS framework.

Committee's Opinion: Referring to Ind AS 19 and the Basis for Conclusions (BC 253) of IAS 19, the Committee noted that employee benefits encompass all forms of consideration given in exchange for service, including those provided to an employee's family members.


4. Lease Assessment for Railway Quarters under Ind AS 116

Context and Opinion: The Committee assessed whether specific arrangements for railway quarters/units constitute a lease. It concluded that an identified asset exists since specific units are designated. Furthermore, the "right to substitute" held by the Railways was found to be non-substantive, as it was intended for mutual convenience rather than a practical ability to substitute assets throughout the period. Consequently, the arrangement was assessed as a lease under Ind AS 116.


Notes on EAC Opinions:

  • These opinions represent the view of the EAC and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the ICAI Council.
  • Opinions are based on specific facts provided by the querist and current prevailing laws.
  • The complete text of these and other opinions can be accessed at: https://eacopinion.icai.org/.

Bridging Compliance and Capital: Chartered Accountants as Catalysts for MSME Expansion

Dr. Kalpana Kataria & Dr. Abhishek Kumar Singh

Introduction

The Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME) sector contributes approximately one-third to India’s GDP and is a cornerstone of the “Make in India” initiative. Recognized as one of the four key engines of economic growth alongside Agriculture, Investment, and Exports, the sector has gained momentum through a sustained government focus on formalization. This policy thrust has significantly enhanced credit penetration, enabling enterprises to access formal financial systems. However, maintaining this growth is essential for the vision of Viksit Bharat by 2047, as the ecosystem remains vulnerable to macroeconomic disruptions, limited capital access, and inadequate technological infrastructure. Strengthening this sector is crucial for inclusive development and a self-reliant economy.

Micro, Small and Medium Enterprise (MSME) Overview

The Indian MSME sector is highly diverse, with approximately 94% of enterprises operating informally and remaining unregistered. Nationally, MSMEs produce around 6,000 products, predominantly in manufacturing sectors like food, textiles, chemicals, and machinery. Currently, the sector contributes approximately 30% to the national Gross Value Added (GVA) and accounts for about 35.4% of total manufacturing output. Globally, MSMEs represent 90% of all businesses and 50% of GDP. In India, over 63 million enterprises employ more than 110 million individuals and account for over 40-45% of exports.

Fig. 1: Key Characteristics of MSMEs

  • Employment Generation: Second-largest job provider after agriculture, covering diverse demographics.
  • Economic Contribution: Substantial contributions to GDP, exports, and industrial output.
  • Diversity: Wide variation in size, technology adoption, and service offerings.

Challenges for MSMEs

MSMEs face numerous hurdles, including outdated technologies, difficulties in accessing formal finance, intense market competition, and supply chain inefficiencies. There is a noted mismatch between credit demand and supply due to collateral constraints. While credit guarantee schemes and invoice discounting platforms like TReDS (Trade Receivables Discounting System) have improved access, many enterprises still rely on informal lending. Furthermore, a study of four core functional areas (Marketing, ICT Adoption, Capacity Building, and Cost Optimization) revealed that advanced ICT tools remain underutilized due to high costs and a lack of skilled manpower.

Contributions of Chartered Accountants (CAs)

Chartered Accountants are pivotal as strategic enablers and resilience builders for MSMEs navigating tighter regulatory regimes and accelerated digitalization.

  • Financial Stewardship and Access to Capital: CAs establish robust systems for bookkeeping, budget forecasting, and cash-flow management. They enhance creditworthiness by preparing auditable financial statements; notably, MSMEs supported by CAs are reportedly twice as likely to secure institutional loans. They also guide MSMEs in tapping equity markets, such as the NSE Emerge platform.
  • Regulatory Compliance and Governance: CAs mitigate the heavy compliance burden (estimated at ₹13 lakh annually per unit) by managing GST filings, income tax, labor laws, and statutory audits. They ensure MSMEs adhere to global accounting standards like IFRS, which enhances investor confidence.
  • Strategic Advisory and Value Creation: Beyond compliance, CAs identify cost efficiencies and investment opportunities. They drive digital transformation by facilitating the adoption of tools like the Udyam Portal and AI-enabled accounting.
  • Policy Enablers & Collaborative Advocacy: CAs translate government schemes (e.g., Mudra, PMEGP) into practical business strategies. They also influence the ease of doing business by advocating for tax rationalization and simplified documentation.

Case Studies and Strategic Horizons

  • Banking and MSME Sector Conclave 2025: Highlighted CAs' role in bridging information asymmetry between small businesses and banks.
  • Boutique Firm Transformation: A firm in Ahmedabad moved from compliance provider to strategic partner by delivering interactive Power BI dashboards, resulting in a 40% rise in advisory fees.
  • Small-Town Scaling: A two-partner firm in Nagpur used ICAI's alliance model to collaborate with a Mumbai firm, allowing them to service listed entities.

Fig. 3: Strategic Planning for CAs and MSMEs

  1. Broaden Digital Advisory: Deepen competencies in AI, blockchain, and cybersecurity.
  2. Facilitate Inclusive Financing: Catalyze access for underserved segments like women-led and rural enterprises.
  3. Simplify Compliance Pathways: Advocate for regulatory simplification.
  4. Drive Sustainable Innovation: Support green frameworks and ESG compliance.
  5. Strengthen Professional Ecosystems: Utilize mentorship clinics and incubation centers.

Conclusion

In a post-pandemic landscape marked by rising competition and supply chain disruptions, MSMEs require a strategic, tech-savvy partnership rather than mere transactional support. CAs provide this through a multidimensional support system. As India aims to become a $35 trillion economy by 2047, the CA-MSME partnership will serve as a foundational pillar, ensuring financial discipline, transparency, and resilience in a competitive global environment.



Saturday, April 04, 2026

ICAI Journal April 2026

 

Editorial: India’s Digital Financial Ecosystem - From Inclusion to Empowerment

The headline proclaims, ‘India’s UPI is leading the world in real-time payments.’ Behind this triumph lies the deeper story of trust, innovation, and implementation, the pillars that have fortified the financial ecosystem for billions of Indians. The nation has transformed from a cash-driven economy to a mobile-first financial system within a decade. By embracing technology through which money seamlessly flows, India has not only redefined digital finance but also carved a proud milestone that signals a transformative leap into the future of global financial systems.

Building on this momentum, the nation is embracing diversity in its truest sense by embedding Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) seamlessly from the grassroots to the highest levels of commerce and governance. Anchored in its core pillars—digital identity, fast payment systems, and secure data exchange layers—India is effectively modifying itself into a connected ecosystem where technology binds every stakeholder. Whether it is identity verification, financial transactions, or the direct delivery of government benefits, technology now serves as the common thread. Furthermore, the effective rollout of faceless income tax assessments, seamless e-filing of returns, and the rationalisation of GST compliance through digital platforms have markedly enhanced transparency, operational efficiency, and the overall ease of doing business.

The numbers further underscore this potential, with India’s fintech sector projected to reach $250 billion by 2030, driven by digital lending, embedded finance, and data-driven innovation. As the nation progresses from enabling digital payments to architecting a comprehensive digital financial ecosystem, initiatives such as the digital rupee (e₹), including offline capabilities introduced by the RBI, signal a future defined by resilience, inclusivity, and forward-looking execution.

Hurdles serve as stepping stones to growth, and the way they are addressed reflects true strength and spirit. As India advances on its journey of building a digital ecosystem, it continues to navigate challenges with resilience while keeping future imperatives in clear focus. The rapid surge in digital adoption has amplified exposure to cybersecurity threats, including fraud, data breaches, and data privacy concerns, thereby necessitating safeguards and heightened regulatory vigilance. India recognises the imperative of expanding digital adoption and is, therefore, undertaking concerted efforts to extend its reach to the remotest corners, ensuring that it becomes truly pervasive and inclusive.

A digitally empowered ecosystem is not the outcome of isolated efforts, but the result of a cohesive convergence of multiple professions, seamlessly integrating technology, finance, and regulatory frameworks. Technology undoubtedly acts as the catalyst, yet its true potential is realised only through responsible adoption and effective implementation. This transition necessitates professionals who can balance innovation with ethics, ensuring that progress remains both sustainable and trustworthy.

In this evolving landscape, Chartered Accountants emerge as key enablers, bridging the gap between technological advancement and financial governance. With their expertise in assurance, risk management, and compliance, they play a vital role in strengthening cybersecurity frameworks, enhancing transparency, and reinforcing stakeholder trust. Guiding enterprises, particularly MSMEs, in adopting digital systems and navigating emerging regulatory frameworks, the profession significantly contributes to building a resilient, inclusive, and future-ready digital economy.

The Institute stands proactively with the nation and its members. It embraces this digital momentum by introducing forward-looking initiatives, including the development of Information System Audit Standards, specialised courses on data protection and data privacy, fraud detection, data analytics, AI, and emerging technologies. The launch of CA GPT as an innovative learning platform reflects its commitment to equipping professionals with future-ready skills. Further, the dynamic evolution and adoption of the Unique Document Identification Number (UDIN) system stands as a landmark reform, reinforcing authenticity and credibility in financial reporting. Together, these initiatives exemplify a cohesive progression towards a transparent, technology-driven, and resilient financial ecosystem.

India is standing united today; it is the power of collective effort, aligned in a common direction, that yields transformative outcomes. India’s rising stature in the global digital financial landscape is a testament to this shared vision, positioning the nation as a trailblazer whose innovations are increasingly being emulated worldwide. As countries look toward India’s models of DPI and inclusive finance, the journey toward becoming a “Vishwaguru” gains tangible momentum. In the words of Mahatma Gandhi, “The future depends on what we do in the present.” With sustained collaboration, governance, and a forward-looking approach, India stands not only to lead but to redefine the contours of the global financial ecosystem.


Ease of Doing Business: Doing Away with Sections 138-148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

By Hareesh Kumar Kolichala, Legal Expert

The Payment and Settlement System across the world during the 19th and 20th centuries was mainly by way of Cheques, Bills of Exchange, and Promissory Notes. Therefore, in India, the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, was enacted to regulate them; however, frequent cheque ‘Dishonour’ persisted, and in the absence of any convenient alternative for transferring large sums for goods or services, cheques remained the preferred mode of payment. In view of the prohibition under the Income Tax Act, 1961, from paying in cash above a specified amount, the payment through cheques has also been a legal necessity in our country. However, unscrupulous people or traders, with mala fide intentions, used to dishonour cheques issued by them by not keeping sufficient funds in their accounts, stopping payment, or closing accounts altogether. Originally, there was no specific remedy under the 1881 Act for victims except filing time-consuming and expensive police complaints or civil suits.

To bring certainty to mercantile transactions and instill confidence in cheque payments, the Parliament of India amended the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, via the Amendment Act of 1988, inserting Sections 138-142. Under these sections, the dishonour of a cheque was made a criminal offence punishable with up to one year of imprisonment or a fine up to twice the cheque's amount. This amendment came into force on April 1, 1989. Because cheques were common, a high incidence of dishonour led to a large number of criminal complaints, which completely overwhelmed the criminal justice system. Complaints remained pending for years due to elaborate trial procedures, choking the disposal of other criminal cases. Consequently, the Act was amended again in 2002 to introduce radical changes, such as making the offence triable summarily, fixing trial completion time limits, and enhancing punishment to two years of imprisonment.

In the landmark case of ***Gimpex Private Limited vs. Manoj Goel (2021)***, the Hon’ble Supreme Court observed that while the object of Section 138 was to inculcate faith in banking operations, the provision has encouraged a disproportionately large number of cases that are choking the judicial system. According to the Law Commission of India’s 213th Report, more than 38 lakh cheque bouncing cases were pending as of October 2008. By December 18, 2024, the Government informed Parliament that this number had risen to 43.05 lakhs.

Acknowledging this severe logjam, the Supreme Court took Suo Moto action in WP (Crl) No. 2/2020, constituting a 10-member Committee that suggested creating Special Negotiable Instruments Courts. A pilot study involving retired judicial officers was conducted in five states with the highest pendency (Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Gujarat, Delhi, and Uttar Pradesh) between September 2022 and August 2023. Since this period expired, hearings in these special courts have stalled, and the Supreme Court’s decision on their continuation is awaited.

Meanwhile, the advent of technology has introduced rapid and efficient alternative payment systems. Users can now utilize the Electronic Clearing Service (ECS), Internet Banking (NEFT/RTGS), and UPI systems like Google Pay and PhonePe. Between January and November 2024 alone, UPI completed 15,547 crore transactions amounting to Rs. 23.49 lakh crore. Unlike the past, when physical cash was the only alternative, these systems are now well-entrenched and regulated by the RBI.

In the case of ***P. Mohan Raj Vs. Shah Brothers Ispat Pvt. Ltd.***, the Supreme Court described Section 138 proceedings as “Civil Sheep in a Criminal Wolf’s clothing,” noting that the offence is quasi-criminal as it arises from a civil wrong. With 3.45 crore criminal cases pending nationally, the criminal courts should focus their limited resources on serious crimes rather than cheque dishonour complaints. On June 8, 2020, the Ministry of Finance proposed the ‘Decriminalization of Minor Offences’ to improve business sentiment and attract foreign investment, noting that the risk of imprisonment for non-fraudulent omissions hurts the Ease of Doing Business.

Globally, the usage of cheques is declining. Singapore has announced corporate cheques will be done away with by the end of 2025, and Australia plans to phase them out by 2030. Developed nations such as the UK, USA, France, Australia, and Singapore have not criminalised cheque dishonour, treating it solely as a civil wrong. Given that India’s UPI systems are more advanced than those in many of these countries, the article argues that the provisions related to cheque dishonour in the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, should be repealed. At a minimum, the Government should fix a threshold—such as Rs. One crore and above—to apply Section 138, which would drastically reduce the burden on criminal courts.


Audit Documentation: A Cornerstone of Audit Quality

By CA. Jyoti Aggarwal

Audit documentation, commonly referred to as working papers, is integral to maintaining the quality and reliability of the auditing process. As emphasized by Standard on Auditing (SA) 230 “Audit Documentation”, it not only ensures compliance with professional standards but also demonstrates the thoroughness and rationale behind audit conclusions. Effective documentation supports audit quality, facilitates future audits, and aids supervision and regulatory reviews. It is not merely a requirement for compliance but a critical component that ensures quality, consistency, and transparency by reflecting the work performed, decisions made, and evidence collected.

Understanding Audit Documentation

Audit documentation is the written record that provides evidence of the auditor’s work, including planning, execution, evidence gathered, and conclusions reached, whether in physical or electronic form. According to SA 230, its objectives are:

  1. Evidence of Audit Quality: Substantiates that the audit was performed in accordance with standards.
  2. Support for Audit Conclusions: Provides the rationale for well-founded opinions.
  3. Facilitating Future Audits: Serves as a resource for planning recurring engagements.
  4. Basis for Supervision and Review: Facilitates supervision and provides a framework for peer and regulatory reviews.

Key Components of Audit Documentation

Comprehensive documentation includes:

  • Audit Plan: Outlining nature, timing, and extent of procedures.
  • Audit Programs: Detailed steps designed to address specific risks.
  • Evidence Collected: Confirmation letters, inspection records, and analytical procedures.
  • Significant Judgments: Documentation of key professional judgments and decision-making.
  • Findings and Conclusions: Summaries of observations and final conclusions.

SA 230 and Its Requirements

SA 230 prescribes that documentation should be:

  1. Sufficient and Appropriate: Detailed enough for an experienced auditor with no prior knowledge to understand the work, judgments, and conclusions.
  2. Timely and Organized: Prepared promptly with proper organization for easy retrieval.
  3. Complete and Transparent: Providing a clear trail of adherence to Standards on Auditing.
  4. Secure and Retained: Stored securely and retained for a minimum of seven years from the date of the auditor's report.

Challenges in Audit Documentation

  • Balancing Detail and Brevity: Striking the right balance between over-documentation and insufficient records.
  • Adapting to Technological Changes: Incorporating digital evidence like logs, screenshots, and electronic communications.
  • Evolving Regulatory Landscape: Continuously adapting to frequent updates to Standards on Auditing.
  • Resource Constraints: Dedicating sufficient resources in smaller firms due to time and cost constraints.
  • Ensuring Consistency: Maintaining uniform standards across large teams.

Practical Guidance for Effective Audit Documentation

Auditors should adopt best practices such as:

  1. Use of Standardized Templates: Leveraging ICAI resources like Audit Working Paper Templates to ensure consistency.
  2. Emphasize Materiality: Focusing on significant risks, key judgments, and findings while avoiding unnecessary details.
  3. Leverage Technology: Using audit software and cloud platforms for real-time updates and secure retrieval.
  4. Regular Training: Staying updated through continuous professional education and ICAI guidance notes.
  5. Robust Review Mechanisms: Instituting rigorous internal peer reviews and quality control checks.

Role of Documentation in Quality Assurance

The Quality Review Board (QRB) of ICAI highlights robust documentation as primary evidence of compliance. Common areas of non-compliance include incomplete procedures, failure to document significant rationale, and lack of supervision records. ICAI’s Implementation Guide to SA 230 (Revised 2022 Edition) provides practical insights to address these gaps.

Emerging Trends and Specialized Contexts

  • Emerging Trends: These include the increased use of digital evidence (transaction logs, emails), the integration of data analytics (documenting rationale for specific data sets), and a focus on cybersecurity risks for technology-driven businesses.
  • Audit Sampling: Documentation must clearly record the sampling method (e.g., random, systematic), size, and results to support conclusions.
  • Fraud Detection: Documentation ensures audits are performed with professional skepticism. Auditors must record fraud risk considerations during planning, specific procedures used, and findings from investigations.
  • Artificial Intelligence (AI): AI tools help identify anomalies and streamline evidence gathering, leading to increased accuracy, reduced manual work, and better risk detection.

The Role of ICAI and Regulatory Bodies

ICAI promotes best practices through training programs, guidance notes, and templates. Regulatory bodies like the Quality Review Board (QRB) conduct reviews to identify improvements and ensure adherence to standards, which is vital for quality assurance.

Conclusion

Audit documentation is a strategic tool underpinning the quality and credibility of the audit process. By embracing technology and best practices, auditors ensure transparency, accountability, and trust in financial reporting.

Reference

Standard on Auditing SA-230, Implementation Guide to SA 230 (Revised 2022 Edition), Audit Documentation, Audit Working Paper Templates by ICAI


The Power of Automation – Smart Applications, Smarter Firms

By CA. Karishma Soni

Introduction Chartered Accountancy (CA) firms in India have long delivered reliable and trusted services through disciplined processes and time-tested methods. Rooted in professional ethics, strong client relationships, and regulatory expertise, these traditional practices have built the foundation of the profession’s credibility and success. However, in today’s rapidly evolving regulatory and business environment, where speed, accuracy, transparency, and client responsiveness are increasingly important, CA practices must gradually embrace digital transformation. Traditional manual workflows often create inefficiencies in communication, document management, and compliance tracking.

Digital solutions such as client portal web applications and smart task and call management systems can significantly improve operational efficiency. A client portal enables secure document exchange, real-time compliance tracking, and structured communication with clients, while task and call management tools streamline internal workflows and strengthen accountability among team members. This article highlights how web portals, software automation, and smart workflow systems can boost productivity, ensure compliance accuracy, and help chartered accountants build more efficient, scalable, and future-ready professional practices.

Client Portal Web App: Strengthening Client Collaboration and Practice Efficiency In the dynamic world of professional accounting, Chartered Accountants (CAs) are expected to juggle client coordination, regulatory compliance, data accuracy, and constantly evolving tax laws, all under tight deadlines. Managing scattered communication, large volumes of data, stringent compliance timelines, and maintaining service transparency has become increasingly complex. In this demanding environment, manual systems are no longer sufficient. CA practices are facing mounting pressure to modernize their operations and meet rising client expectations. Traditional workflows heavily reliant on emails, physical files, and fragmented tools are proving inadequate in today’s fast-paced, digital-first landscape.

The solution for this is a Client Portal Web Application, which is a secure, cloud-based platform designed to centralize communication, simplify document exchange, automate repetitive tasks, and minimize human errors. It not only optimizes internal efficiency but also delivers a more seamless and professional client experience. Most importantly, such portals can be custom-developed to align with a chartered accountancy firm’s unique workflow, service offerings, management style, and scale, making them a powerful asset for transforming how CAs operate, collaborate, and deliver value to their clients.

Understanding the Client Portal Web App A Client Portal Web App is a cloud-based solution that enables secure, structured interaction between practicing chartered accountants and their clients. Rather than relying on messages, endless email threads, or physical paperwork, the portal serves as a centralized platform where:

  • Clients can upload and access documents, check compliance statuses, and communicate with the CAs.
  • Team members can manage workflows, monitor deadlines, and reduce routine administrative work.
  • Partners or senior professionals can oversee overall firm activity, document flow, and service delivery.

Customizable Secure Login, Role-Based Access & Audit Trails In a financial environment, safeguarding data and managing access are critical. A custom-developed client portal can be tailored to include:

  • Secure Login with Two-Factor Authentication (2FA): Custom security protocols can be integrated to ensure that only authorized users gain access.
  • Role-Based Access Control: Access levels can be precisely configured for clients, partners, and internal team members, based on their specific roles and responsibilities.
  • Comprehensive Activity Logs & Audit Trails: Every user interaction, such as logins, file uploads, and status changes, can be tracked in detail, enabling transparency and ensuring audit compliance.

Smart Document Structuring for Seamless Access (Custom-Tailored) Efficient document organization is essential for any chartered accountancy practice. Through custom portal development, we can design a smart, hierarchical document structure, organized first by service type (e.g., GST, Income Tax, TDS) and then by financial year, ensuring quick and logical access to relevant files. This intuitive structure can be seamlessly tailored during portal development to align with the firm’s operational model, including its practice type, scale, service portfolio, client base, internal workflow, and document management approach.

Key Benefits and Core Functionalities of a Client Portal Web App That Streamlines CA Practice

1. Real-Time Project Status Updates: Minimizing Client Follow-Ups One of the most frequent operational challenges faced by chartered accountancy practices is the constant inflow of client queries such as “Has my Income Tax Return been filed?”, “What’s the status of my GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B?”, and “Is my TDS return submitted?”. These repeated follow-ups are not only time-consuming but also disrupt internal workflows, particularly during high-pressure compliance periods. A client portal addresses this pain point by offering real-time visibility into project status. Each task or service can be assigned a color-coded status (e.g., Pending, In Review, Completed). Clients can independently track the status of their filings and services through their portal dashboard. This transparency reduces the need for manual updates and communication.

2. Seamless Document Collection and Cloud-Based Storage Document collection is traditionally messy, scattered across messages, emails, or even physical submissions, leading to confusion, duplication, or missing files. The Client Portal Web App provides a centralized, secure upload system that streamlines the entire process. Clients can upload KYC documents like PAN, Aadhaar, incorporation certificates, and bank details directly to their profiles. Year-wise and service-wise folders allow document submissions like bank statements, invoices, loan papers, TDS challans, and GST return data. The portal supports multiple formats—PDF, Excel, Word, and images.

This eliminates email trails and follow-up for document resubmissions, saves support staff time by automating document collection and verification, reduces errors from misplaced or incomplete documents, and stores files securely on cloud servers, ensuring 24/7 access, data backup, and version control. Most importantly, it eliminates the need for local system storage, freeing up device space and reducing dependency on physical infrastructure.

3. Compliance Overview & Automated Due Date Reminders Missing due dates can result in penalties and strained client relationships. A custom portal helps automate compliance tracking. It displays a comprehensive dashboard of upcoming and overdue filings, sends automated reminders for key services such as ITR, GSTR-1/3B, TDS returns, and ROC filings, and issues alerts via email, SMS, or in-app notifications to both clients and support teams. This enhances compliance accuracy and reduces the manual follow-up burden.

4. Service Overview, Billing & Payment Follow-Up Managing billing and service tracking can be inefficient. Clients often forget services taken or pending payments. The client portal simplifies this by displaying a bifurcation of all services availed during the year, providing access to invoice details and downloadable bills, and sending automated payment reminders. Importantly, firms can restrict access to key documents (e.g., ITR, GSTR, reports) if payment is pending, encouraging timely clearance and reducing revenue leakage.

5. On-Demand Document Access for Clients Clients often request repeat access to documents like ITR acknowledgments, Form 26AS, financials, and GST returns. This adds operational load. The portal streamlines this by allowing the team to upload once, enabling perpetual access for clients, reducing repetitive workload for operations staff, and empowering clients with access to records anytime, from any device.

6. Integrated Chat Panel for Structured Communication To bridge communication gaps, the integrated chat feature offers real-time messaging between clients and designated team members, smart chatbots for handling FAQs and standard queries, notifications for new messages or updates, and permanent, non-editable chat logs for audit and dispute resolution. This system fosters transparency, responsiveness, and a clear engagement history.

7. Push Notifications, Rule Updates & Document Upload Alerts The portal acts as a smart communication bridge between the firm and clients, ensuring critical updates aren’t missed. Key capabilities include sending push notifications for rule changes, compliance updates, budget highlights, and due dates; alerting clients and team members when documents are uploaded or submissions are pending; tracking document submissions via the admin panel to identify incomplete profiles or missing uploads; and maintaining an organized log of all communications and alerts for future reference.

8. Admin Dashboards for Document & Workflow Monitoring The backend of the portal can be equipped with robust admin tools that empower chartered accounting practices to track document upload status across all clients, apply filters to view which clients have submitted data vs. pending, monitor return filing status—filed vs. pending, for specific services, and generate reports for internal performance tracking and workflow planning. These dashboards offer complete visibility into client responsiveness and help prioritize work efficiently.

9. Personnel Assignment & Controlled Client Access In a growing chartered accounting practice, managing responsibilities and delegating client work efficiently across the in-house team becomes increasingly important. A well-designed client portal is not just for clients; it also serves as a robust back-office management tool. One of its most impactful backend features is the ability to assign specific clients to individual team members. Key capabilities include Client-to-Team Mapping, Unique Client Codes or File Numbers, and Granular Access Rights. This results in improved work allocation, clearly defined tasks for each document management executive, and reduced confusion or overlap. Partners and managers can track progress per team member based on assigned clients. Sensitive data is visible only to authorized professionals, supporting internal governance.

Smart Task & Call Management Web App: A Game-Changer for Modern Chartered Accounting Practices A practicing Chartered Accountant committed to improving operational efficiency in professional practice environments believes that a Smart Task & Call Management Web App can be custom-developed to address the evolving workflow and client service needs of modern chartered accounting firms. Such a platform is designed to streamline the internal workflow of team members through structured task assignment and tracking and to enhance client satisfaction by efficiently managing calls and converting them into actionable service requests.

Why Traditional Task & Call Handling Needs a Smarter Framework In many chartered accounting practices, task allocation and client interactions are often managed through informal channels such as verbal instructions, emails, or messaging apps. While these may work in smaller setups, they become difficult to manage as work volume and client communication increase.

This is where a custom-developed Smart Task & Call Management Web App proves invaluable. Its core purpose is twofold:

  1. Streamline internal workflows by assigning and tracking tasks among team members in a structured, transparent way.
  2. Manage client calls efficiently by logging every incoming service request, ensuring no query is missed or overlooked.

When a call is received, the app allows the user to instantly convert that conversation into an actionable task. This centralized system ensures transparency, accountability, and audit-readiness.

1. Role-Based Dashboards with Controlled Access The system enables the admin to create multiple user accounts and define access levels based on roles and responsibilities. For instance, team leads may be granted broader visibility, such as the ability to view the status and history of tasks assigned across the team, while individual team members can only access tasks specifically assigned to them. Sensitive controls like task deletion can be reserved exclusively for the admin.

2. Real-Time Task Allocation & Status Updates Team leads can allocate tasks to specific team members directly through the admin dashboard by entering essential details such as the client’s mobile number, the type of service required (e.g., GST registration, ITR filing), and any specific remarks or instructions. Once assigned, the team member will find the task in their “To-Do List”. Upon initiating the work, they can update the status to “Ongoing,” and upon completion, it may be marked as “Successfully Closed” or “Unsuccessful,” along with supporting remarks. This removes the need for repeated follow-ups.

3. Detailed Task History and Timestamped Logs Every action, whether a status change or a remark, is recorded with a timestamp. This provides a complete audit trail, supports performance reviews, and reinforces team accountability.

4. Reassignment, Rescheduling, and Flexibility Tasks can be reassigned to different team members or rescheduled as needed, either by the admin or authorized users. Team members can also self-assign tasks, ensuring no responsibility is left unmanaged. This flexibility helps balance workloads and meet shifting priorities without compromising deadlines.

5. Enhancing Communication with Built-in Smart Call Management Client phone calls can be efficiently handled within the web app. A designated call handler can log the call into the platform in real-time, assigning it directly to the appropriate personnel. This ensures that all service requests are addressed promptly, and nothing is missed, even during high-volume periods. For example, a client may call to request a GST amendment. The call handler instantly logs it into the app and assigns it to the GST team. The task appears in the assignee’s dashboard and gets addressed without any verbal follow-up.

6. Customizable Filters & Analytics The admin dashboard can be custom-developed with intelligent filters to view tasks by status, such as To-Do, Ongoing, Successfully Closed, or Unsuccessful. These filters offer role-based task visibility, real-time tracking, and workflow transparency at the admin level. Integrating such features into a custom-built application allows quick identification of pending or overdue tasks, efficient monitoring of active assignments, and generation of analytics on performance trends and bottlenecks.

Business Impact of Using a Smart Task & Call Management App The impact of implementing such a system is multifold. It leads to the elimination of scattered messages and verbal updates and introduces streamlined time management and task tracking. Clear responsibilities enhance team coordination, improving client service through timely delivery. The system also ensures audit readiness via complete records and activity logs and enables secure access controls with Two-Factor Authentication (2FA).

Final Reflection: The Case for Custom-Developed Solutions The day-to-day operations of a chartered accountancy practice witness how smart technology can redefine routine workflows and elevate client service delivery. While many firms opt for off-the-shelf software, custom applications tailored to specific needs can become long-term digital assets. A well-designed custom application introduces meaningful automation across recurring tasks, reduces manual intervention, and ensures consistent, timely execution. Built-in process standardization enhances accuracy, improves workflow efficiency, and ultimately raises the overall quality of service delivery.

Beyond operational benefits, such solutions strengthen data security through access controls, encryption, and secure storage, aligned with regulatory and confidentiality standards. More importantly, they foster a transparent, responsive client experience, enhancing satisfaction and long-term retention. While developing a custom application may require initial time and resource investment, its long-term value is substantial. Over time, it becomes a critical digital asset, offering tighter control, reducing administrative overhead, and enabling scalable growth.

Conclusion Today, we stand at the edge of a progressive shift, one that calls for exploring digital solutions aligned with our practice models. This is the time for us, as professionals, to take a step forward, to conceptualize custom tools built around our unique workflows. Alongside this, a wide array of AI tools, cloud platforms, and web apps offer scalable support for smarter, more agile practice management. The future belongs to those ready to innovate, adapt, and lead their practices into the digital era.


Author may be reached at cakarishmasoni@gmail.com and eboard@icai.in.


Global Trade: Turning Costs into Strategy: How Indian Exporters Can Respond to Rising U.S. Tariffs

By CA. (Dr.) Nikhil Zaveri

The recent escalation of tariffs in the United States has unsettled global trade patterns, particularly for export-oriented economies like India. While tariff hikes were directed mainly at Chinese products, their ripple effects were felt across value chains and competing suppliers. This article discusses the nature of tariffs, their impact on Indian exporters, and how Management Accounting techniques—specifically Cost Segregation, Contribution Margin (CM), and Break-Even Point (BEP) analysis—can help firms evaluate whether to sustain their presence in the U.S. or pivot to alternative markets. Drawing on India’s preferential trade agreements, the article identifies regions such as the Middle East, Australia, and ASEAN as viable destinations where tariff relief, shorter logistics, and indirect cost savings could preserve competitiveness.

Introduction

In recent years, tariffs have re-emerged as a potent policy instrument in the global economy. The United States, long regarded as a champion of free trade, has increasingly used tariffs to protect strategic sectors. For Indian exporters, who often operate on thin margins, such measures can tilt the balance between profit and loss. What makes the present context distinctive is that tariffs are no longer merely economic tools but also political signals. While recent tariff actions have been directed primarily at Chinese imports, Indian exporters to the U.S. face a more uncertain and arguably less predictable trade environment. It is therefore timely to revisit how Management Accounting can serve as a compass for strategic navigation.

Tariffs and Their Implications

Tariffs function as import duties that increase the cost of goods entering a country, thereby altering price competitiveness. While their stated purpose is to protect domestic producers, the effect is to raise the landed cost of imports. Recent U.S. tariffs on electric vehicles (100%), solar wafers (50%), and tungsten products (25%) demonstrate the sharpness of these increases.

For Indian firms, the immediate consequence is twofold:

  1. Products that directly compete with Chinese exports may find an opening, provided they can enter the market at competitive landed prices.
  2. For categories where Indian exports themselves are subject to duties, the additional tariff burden erodes margins unless it is offset elsewhere in the value chain.

From Accounting to Strategy: An Integrated Framework

In such conditions, intuition alone is insufficient. Companies require a structured, numerical framework provided by Management Accounting:

  • Cost Segregation: Distinguishing variable costs (raw materials, freight, tariffs, commissions) from fixed costs (administration, certification, promotion).
  • Contribution Margin Analysis: Identifying what remains after variable costs are deducted from the net selling price.
  • Break-Even Analysis: Determining the sales volume needed to recover fixed costs.

These tools help exporters answer the strategic question: Whether to continue in the U.S. market or reallocate to alternative markets with lower tariffs and leaner indirect costs?.

Through the Lens of Management Accounting

Tariff changes are disruptions that ripple through cost structures and profit margins. Instinct or reliance on sales volumes is insufficient; firms need a lens that converts raw cost data into strategic insight.

1. Cost Segregation: Clarifying the Anatomy of Costs

Clarity is the starting point for strategy. Tariffs alter the variable cost structure; an item that attracted a 5% duty may now face 20% or 50%. By segregating costs, exporters can identify which increases are truly variable (linked to tariffs) and which indirect costs (like financing inventory for long shipping routes) are magnified when tariffs lengthen customs clearance times. For example, an auto components manufacturer may find that while raw material duties inflate per-unit costs, fixed expenses like plant maintenance and R&D remain unchanged, allowing a more accurate assessment of whether production should be reallocated to tariff-free destinations like ASEAN or the UAE.

2. Contribution Margin Analysis: Beyond Revenue, Towards Value

A common trap is chasing revenue at any cost. Contribution Margin (CM) analysis subtracts variable costs (inflated by tariffs and freight) from the sales price to isolate the value each unit contributes to covering fixed costs. Strategic insight lies in comparison: a U.S. consignment might yield a 25,000 CM per unit after tariffs, while an Australian order delivers35,000 CM. Though the U.S. volume might be higher, the Australian market delivers more value per unit of capacity. CM analysis shifts the decision from "How much are we selling?" to "How much are we keeping?".

3. Break-Even Analysis: Quantifying the Threshold of Viability

Even with shrinking margins, firms may argue for staying in the U.S. for reputation or long-term contracts. Break-Even Point (BEP) analysis provides realism. For an apparel exporter, if tariffs drop the CM per unit from 450 to300, the company now needs to sell 16,600 units (instead of 11,100) to recover `5 crore in fixed costs. If realistic U.S. demand is only 12,000 units, the strategy is unsustainable. BEP is a litmus test of viability that forces leadership to decide whether to pivot to alternative geographies.

4. From Analysis to Strategy: Creating Focus

Together, these tools create a decision-making triad where cost segregation defines the pain, CM highlights value, and BEP reveals viability. Synthesizing these insights might lead an exporter to discover that ASEAN markets offer both higher contribution and a realistic break-even compared to the U.S.. This focused approach prevents the dilution of financial resources and transforms Management Accounting into a compass for navigating global volatility.

Alternative Markets for Indian Exporters

India’s network of trade agreements provides exporters with options to reduce barriers:

  • Middle East and GCC (UAE and Oman): Under the India–UAE CEPA (2022), over 90% of India's exports enjoy zero customs duty. The recent India–Oman CEPA (2024) further provides preferential access and serves as a logistics gateway to East Africa. Shorter transit times (3–5 days vs. 30–40 days for the U.S.) reduce working capital lock-in and enhance contribution margins.
  • Australia: The Australia–India ECTA (2022) eliminated customs duties on more than 85% of tariff lines, benefiting sectors like textiles, leather, and auto components.
  • ASEAN Economies: The ASEAN–India Free Trade Agreement offers tariff reduction across 75% of lines, providing geographic proximity and value-chain integration in countries like Vietnam, Indonesia, and Thailand.
  • Japan, South Korea, and Europe (EFTA): CEPAs with Japan and South Korea, and the new India–EFTA agreement (2024), expand the universe of low-tariff, high-value destinations.
  • Singapore: Under the India–Singapore CECA, most goods enter at zero duty, making it a critical re-export hub for Southeast Asia with predictable customs procedures.
  • Europe (EFTA and EU): The India–EFTA TEPA (2024) provides near-complete duty-free access for non-agricultural exports to Switzerland, Norway, Iceland, and Liechtenstein. While the broader EU has stricter standards, it remains a stable destination for those who can absorb compliance costs.
  • Africa: Preferential arrangements like the India–Mauritius CECPA provide duty advantages in regions with emerging demand and shorter shipping distances than the U.S. or Europe.

Direct and Indirect Cost Considerations

Tariff savings alone do not determine attractiveness; indirect costs like transit time and documentation complexity decisively alter profitability. Shorter routes to the Middle East materially reduce financing costs and inventory risk. Indirect cost reductions of even 2–3% function like "hidden revenue," lowering the break-even point. Destination choice must be evaluated on "total cost economics".

Managerial Implications

Finance managers must broaden their lens to incorporate indirect costs and tariff preferences. Accountants are evolving from custodians of compliance to advisors who shape strategy. True competitiveness lies in combining CM and BEP with contextual intelligence regarding trade agreements and port efficiency.

Conclusion

Tariffs in the U.S. remind us that international trade is about strategy as much as price. For Indian exporters, Management Accounting tools are indispensable frameworks for clarity and resilience. Market selection should be a strategic decision guided by contribution margin and total cost economics rather than legacy volumes. In a world of shifting tariff regimes, this analytical capability will be the decisive edge for Indian exporters.

References

  • ASEAN Secretariat (2021). ASEAN–India Free Trade Agreement Overview. Jakarta.
  • Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT), Australia (2022). Australia–India Economic Cooperation and Trade Agreement. Canberra.
  • Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India (2022). India–UAE CEPA. New Delhi.
  • Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), Government of India (2024). India–Oman CEPA. New Delhi.
  • Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) (2024). Section 301 Tariff Actions. Washington DC.
  • World Trade Organization (WTO) (2023). World Trade Report: Tariffs and Trade Measures. Geneva.

Building Future-Ready CA Firms: LLP vs Partnership Under ICAI’s Strategic Practice Frameworks

By CA. Pradeep Kumar B A

Chartered Accountant (CA) firms in India are navigating a major inflection point. Traditional partnership structures are increasingly strained under the weight of expanding regulatory demands, geographical presence needs, and client expectations for multidisciplinary expertise. The emergence of Limited Liability Partnerships (LLPs), particularly those enabled through ICAI’s 2022–2024 regulatory frameworks, offers an alternative that balances professional independence, scalability, and legal resilience.

This article provides a holistic, structured, and ICAI-compliant comparison of LLPs and traditional partnerships with special emphasis on legal frameworks, audit controls, partner roles, merger protocols, governance models, succession planning, and technological integration. Through strategic use of the MDP Guidelines (2022), Networking Guidelines (2021), Aggregation Model (2024), and Merger/Demerger Frameworks (2024), the analysis lays out a clear decision matrix. Whether you’re a sole proprietor, mid-sized regional firm, or a returning professional from industry, LLPs now provide ICAI-approved, ethically governed structures aligned with modern firm aspirations. With benefits ranging from liability shielding and client trust to institutional brand building and global compatibility, the LLP model is no longer an option; it’s the roadmap to a future-ready CA practice.

Introduction

India’s professional landscape is undergoing transformation. The shift is not merely legal or operational but strategic and inevitable. As the global economy integrates, clients increasingly demand firms that can offer bundled services: audit, advisory, risk, tax, digital, legal, and ESG. Traditional partnerships, with their individualistic decision-making and informal governance, struggle to respond to these demands.

With the introduction of the Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) Act, 2008, and further bolstered by ICAI’s proactive reforms including the Multidisciplinary Partnership (MDP) Guidelines 2022, Networking Framework 2021, LLP Aggregation Model 2024, and Merger and Demerger Protocols 2024, Chartered Accountants now have a legal, scalable, and strategic blueprint to build firms that are future-proof.

The LLP structure bridges the gap between flexibility and institutionalism, offering limited liability, perpetual succession, customizable governance, legal identity, professional brand continuity, and multidisciplinary partnerships under regulation. This makes it ideal for sole proprietors seeking scalability and succession, mid-sized firms looking to standardize governance, new CAs wanting structured career pathways, and industry-returning professionals needing re-entry via MDPs.

ICAI’s MDP Framework – 2022

The Multidisciplinary Partnership (MDP) framework introduced in 2022 revolutionized how CAs can collaborate with professionals from other domains.

  • Permissible Partners under Regulation 53B: Company Secretaries (CS), Cost and Management Accountants (CMA), Advocates, Engineers, Architects, and Actuaries.
  • Core Conditions:
    • Majority CA Control: CAs must remain in majority in both headcount and profit share.
    • Audit Independence: Only CAs can sign attest functions; non-CAs are barred from accessing audit revenues.
    • Naming Rights: One MDP firm name per CA is permitted.
    • Structural Flexibility: MDPs may function as LLPs or traditional partnerships.
    • Revenue Segregation: Non-CAs may share in non-audit services only.

This framework enables multidisciplinary service delivery under one brand, supports returning professionals with diverse expertise, and provides a structural base for ESG, forensic, IT audit, and legal advisory integration.

Governance, Deadlock Management & Partner Rights

In traditional partnerships, governance is generally informal, power is distributed equally unless modified by deed, and there is a high risk of firm dissolution during retirement or death of a partner. In contrast, LLPs provide robust governance features. Retirement and expulsion clauses can be pre-coded into the LLP Agreement, allowing expulsion for misconduct or inactivity without dissolving the firm. Decision-making can be allocated based on capital, role, seniority, or strategic contributions.

Table: Traditional Partnership vs LLP: Legal & Structural Comparison

CriteriaPartnership FirmLLP (MDP or CA-only)
Legal StatusNot a separate legal entitySeparate legal entity (Section 3, LLP Act)
LiabilityUnlimited (joint & several)Limited to contribution (Section 27–28)
SuccessionMay dissolve on partner exitPerpetual succession (Section 24)
GovernanceDeed-based (varies by state)LLP Agreement (customizable, filed with MCA)
VotingDefault: one partner = one voteCapital-based or custom model
Profit SharingAs per DeedAs per Agreement; includes fixed + variable models
Admission/ExitRequires amendment deedRequires MCA filing (Form 4) + Agreement update
Legal RecognitionWeak in tenders, PSU, and MNC contractsRecognized under MCA; preferred for large contracts
TransparencyLow (not public)High (public via MCA portal)

Deadlock Management in LLPs

LLPs allow pre-agreed arrangements for conflict resolution, such as a casting vote by a designated Chairperson or Managing Partner, arbitration clauses referring disputes to third parties, or "Russian Roulette" (Shotgun) clauses where one partner offers to buy out the other at a set price. Disputes can also be escalated to a Central Board or Ombudsman for Aggregated LLPs. Traditional partnerships usually lack such pre-defined arrangements, leaving disputes open-ended or forcing dissolution.

In an LLP structure, the legal and operational distinction between Designated Partners, Limited Partners, and functional team members enables the firm to strategically assign responsibilities without conferring equal ownership, liability, or voting rights.

Table: Role-Based Comparison: Designated vs Limited Partners vs Traditional Partners

ParameterDesignated Partner (LLP)Limited Partner (LLP)Partner (Traditional Firm)
Legal ResponsibilityStatutorily responsible for filings, complianceNot legally liable beyond capitalJointly and severally liable
Management ParticipationYes (as defined in agreement)Yes – Active participation requiredDefault = Yes
Signing Authority (Audit)Yes (if CA)Yes (if CA)Yes (if CA)
DIN/DPIN RequiredYesNoNo
Entry/Exit ProtocolVia Form 4 + LLP AgreementAs per LLP AgreementBy Deed Amendment
Voting PowerCustomizableCustomizableHeadcount (default)
Liability ExposureUnlimited for non-complianceLimited to contributionUnlimited personal liability
Retirement/ ResignationGoverned by LLP Agreement + MCAAs per LLP AgreementMay require dissolution

ICAI-Compliant Profit Models

Profit-sharing models are central to maintaining equity and motivation. A key compliance principle is that only CAs can share audit revenues; non-CAs in MDPs may participate only in non-audit work (ICAI Code of Ethics, 2020 and SA 220).

Table: Profit Sharing Comparison

ModelPartnership FirmLLPICAI’s View
Equal SharingYesYesPermitted
Capital-based SharingYesYesEncouraged
Performance IncentivesYesYesAllowed (non-audit)
Revenue SplitYesYesMandatory under SA 220
Fixed + Variable PayDifficult to structureYesPermitted if defined

Regulatory Filings, Transparency & Public Credibility

Traditional firms are regulated by state-level registrars, leading to a lack of standardized forms and no online visibility. LLPs are regulated by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA), with filings accessible online.

Table: Regulatory Filings & Visibility

AspectPartnership FirmLLP
Public ViewNot availableYes (via MCA portal)
Required FilingsMinimalAnnual Return (Form 11), Financials (Form 8)
Tech IntegrationManual/PhysicalFully online via MCA-21
TimelineVaries; informalLegally mandated timelines
Tender ReputationWeak identityStrong legal identity (PSU/MNC preferred)

Merger and Demerger Framework for CA Firms

The ICAI Merger and Demerger Guidelines (2024) offer a statutory path for formal consolidation. For mergers, entities must file Form MDA-1 with ICAI detailing the structure and CA majority, and complete the process within 6 months, including MCA filings (Forms 3 and 14). Audit assignments must remain with CA partners, and a new Firm Registration Number (FRN) must be obtained. Demergers require Form MDA-2 and predefining brand usage, client retention, and staff migration.

ICAI Networking Guidelines – 2021

Networking allows firms to collaborate without a full merger.

  • Referral: Pure client hand-off; no fee pooling.
  • Formal Network: Joint delivery and shared SOPs; no audit fee pooling.
  • AOP Network: Common name and non-audit revenue pooling; requires ICAI registration. Each network member remains independent for audit purposes.

LLP Aggregation Model – 2024

The Aggregation Model is a hybrid where a central brand is adopted by multiple separate LLPs. Legal identities remain separate, but policies, branding, HR, and tech stacks are shared. Audit revenue must not be pooled, and each LLP must confirm CA majority control.

Entry Pathways and Global Best Practices

ICAI now supports multiple entry pathways into LLPs based on professional stage, including sole proprietors seeking scalability, industry veterans returning to practice, and newly qualified CAs. Globally, professional firms are structured as LLPs for limited liability, institutional continuity, and transparency. Indian CA firms using the LLP structure can bid for international tenders more easily and attract foreign investment via the automatic FDI route.

Strategic Roadmap for Merging CA Entities

The roadmap involves seven stages:

  1. Strategic Alignment: Agreeing on long-term objectives and governance.
  2. Networking Start: Coordinated service delivery as independent entities.
  3. Transition of Entities to LLP: Statutory conversion via Form 17.
  4. Functional Onboarding: Defining vertical heads and compensation models.
  5. ICAI LLP Aggregation: Filing aggregation declaration and unified branding.
  6. Final Merger: Culminating in a single LLP structure (Statutory Forms 6, 14, and 3).
  7. ICAI Merger Notification: Filing Form MDA-1 and obtaining a new FRN.

Technology Stack and Conclusion

A scalable technology ecosystem is essential, including Google Workspace/Microsoft 365 for communication and dedicated tools like Zoho Practice, Audit360, or CCH iFirm for practice management and documentation.

In conclusion, the modern CA firm must be professionally governed, legally compliant, multidisciplinary, and technologically integrated. The LLP model provides the transformative roadmap to achieve scale without compromising integrity. It is more than a legal structure; it is a strategy for legacy building. ICAI has provided the guidelines—future-ready firms must now act.


Accountant’s Browser

PROFESSIONAL NEWS & VIEWS PUBLISHED ELSEWHERE Index of some useful articles taken from Periodicals received during February – March 2026 for the reference of Faculty/Students & Members of the Institute.

1. Accountancy

  • Accounting Treatment of Expenditure incurred on Development of a Pilot / Model Factory Under Ind AS 16 by Dolphy D’Souza and Geetanshu Bansal. BCAJ, February 2026, PP. 93-95
  • Depreciation Policy Changes by Large Technology Companies: Analysis Under Indian Accounting Standards by Manish Shah. BCAJ, February 2026, PP. 27-32
  • The Earnings Call: Beyond the Balance Sheets by Neeraj Vasudevan. Chartered Secretary, February 2026, PP. 75-79

2. Economics

  • Artificial Intelligence, Demand Switching and Sectoral Wage Gap by Shreya Roy and Bibek Ray Chaudhuri. Economic & Political Weekly, February 28, 2026, PP. 32-36
  • Causal Analysis of Fiscal-Trade-Policies Uncertainty and Economic Growth in Nigeria: Recalling Economic Policy Corrective Actions by Yusuf Bala Zaria, Jasman Tuyon and Hylmee Matahir. Decision Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, V. 52, No. 4, PP. 561-579
  • Dividend Governance in India by Mayur Mazumdar. Chartered Secretary, February 2026, PP. 70-74

3. Education

  • Transforming Higher Education Through Technology: Government Initiatives and the Road Ahead in India by K Praveena and K Jayaprakash. University News, February 23 - March 01, 2026, PP. 19-22

4. Management

  • Corporate Governance Standards for Municipal Corporations: A Compliance Framework by Kunal Mandwale. Chartered Secretary, February 2026, P. 65-69
  • Digital Maturity in Primary Care Facilities: Assessing its Influence on Organisational Commitment and Job Satisfaction by Lillana Hawrysz, Magdalena Kludacz-Alessandri and Malgorzata Fialkoswska-Filipek. Decision Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, V. 52, No. 4, PP. 461-478
  • Will Your Investors Support Your Strategic Pivot? Here’s How to Figure That Out by Mark DesJardine and Wei Shi. Harvard Business Review, March-April 2026, PP. 65-73

5. Taxation and Finance

  • Decoding GST: Burden of Proof by Sunil Gabhawalla, Rishabh Singhvi and Parth Shah. BCAJ, February 2026, PP. 76-82
  • Budget 2026-27: Forging Viksit Bharat’s Path through Global Headwinds by Asish Mohan. Chartered Secretary, February 2026, PP. 60-64

Full Texts of the above articles are available with the Central Council library, ICAI, which can be referred on all working days. For further inquiries please contact on 011-30110419 and 011-30110420 or by e-mail at library@icai.in.


Opinion: Timing of Capitalization of Partly Completed Gas Pipeline (Phase I) Under Ind AS Framework

This section presents the opinion of the Expert Advisory Committee (EAC) of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India regarding the accounting treatment for a gas pipeline project under the Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS).

A. Facts of the Case

In March 2015, the Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas (MoP&NG) constituted a committee to prepare the "Hydrocarbon Vision 2030 for North-East India." The project involves constructing the North East Gas Grid (NEGG), divided into multiple phases. Phase I includes sections such as the Guwahati-Numaligarh pipeline, with an estimated length of 392 Km. The Company’s accounting policy states that expenses exclusively attributable to the project during the construction period are considered Capital Work-in-Progress (CWIP). Property, plant, and equipment (PPE) are capitalized only when the asset is brought to the location and condition necessary for it to be capable of operating in the manner intended by management. Currently, 195.898 Km of the Guwahati-Numaligarh section is mechanically complete, but commercial operation depends on the completion of the entire 392 Km stretch, as the Numaligarh Refinery is the anchor customer.

B. Query

The Expert Advisory Committee was asked to determine whether the Company should capitalize the total cost incurred till date for the 195.898 Km section, even though:

  • (a) The partially completed pipeline is not yet in the location and condition necessary for it to be capable of operating as intended by management; and
  • (b) The line is not yet commercially operated as envisaged.

C. Points Considered by the Committee

  1. Ind AS 16 Requirements: Recognition of costs in the carrying amount of PPE must cease when the item is in the location and condition necessary for it to be capable of operating in the manner intended by management. This point in time is a question of fact determined by technical evaluations and test runs. Crucially, capitalization depends on the intended manner of operation, not the actual start of commercial use or intended capacity.
  2. Ind AS 23 (Borrowing Costs): Capitalization of borrowing costs should cease when an entity completes construction of a qualifying asset in parts, provided each part is capable of being used while construction continues on other parts. If a part cannot be used until the whole is complete (like a sequence in an industrial plant), capitalization continues.
  3. Application to the Case: The facts suggest that the completed 195.898 Km stretch can only be put to its ultimate use once the entire 392 Km stretch is complete, as there is only one receiving terminal (RT) for the entire section. Consequently, this section is not independently capable of being operated as intended by management.

D. Opinion

On the basis of the facts supplied, the Committee is of the following opinion:

  • The partially completed section (195.898 Km) does not appear to be in the location and condition necessary for it to be capable of operating in the intended manner as per Ind AS 16. Therefore, capitalization of further costs on this section should not be ceased, and it should remain classified as Capital Work-in-Progress (CWIP).
  • Regarding borrowing costs, since the partially completed section is not capable of being used individually and independent of other parts, the capitalization of borrowing costs (interest) should continue until the complete 392 Km pipeline is ready for use.

Note: This opinion is based on the specific facts provided by the querist and finalised by the Committee on 10th July, 2025. Detailed compendiums of EAC opinions are available for purchase from the ICAI CDS Portal.


The Fraud Triangle Reimagined: Why People Cross Ethical Lines

By CA. Lekshmi N

Introduction

Why do people indulge in unethical practices? The Fraud Triangle, comprising pressure, opportunity, and rationalization, has helped us answer that, remaining one of the most useful tools for understanding why people commit fraud at work. This article revisits the framework through a behavioural lens, exploring new pressures like the Fear of Missing Out (FOMO) and burnout, modern opportunities in a digital world, and shifts in moral lines. It provides actionable insights for Chartered Accountants and fraud examiners to strengthen prevention by understanding the human stories behind white-collar crime.

The Fraud Triangle

“Thus, conscience does make cowards of us all.” — Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1. White-collar crime is not just about numbers; it is about people under pressure who convince themselves that no one will notice and still think of themselves as “good people”. Developed by criminologist Donald Cressey, the traditional triangle states three elements must be present for fraud to occur: Pressure, Opportunity, and Rationalization. However, in today’s digital and mixed work contexts, the shape of each corner has shifted.

Pillar I: Modern Pressures Beyond Financial Stress

While traditional pressures involved desperate financial situations, modern unethical decisions are often driven by far more subtle factors.

  • The Fear of Missing Out (FOMO): In a world of curated social media success, high-performing professionals may feel left behind. This voice can lead individuals to fudge expense reports or inflate sales to "level the playing field".
  • The Digital Economy: The narrative of instant hyper-success (e.g., crypto-investors or influencers) creates pressure to achieve results faster. This can lead professionals to cut corners to bridge the gap between expectation and reality.
  • Burnout: Remote work has blurred boundaries, leading to a silent epidemic of exhaustion. An emotionally fatigued employee may think, “I’ve given this company everything; a little extra for myself won’t hurt,” causing ethical boundaries to dissolve.
  • Job Insecurity: Chronic insecurity in a gig-oriented or restructuring workforce breeds a survival mindset, pushing individuals to exploit loopholes they might otherwise reject.
  • Toxic Corporate Cultures: Environments where underperformance is publicly punished and sales targets are unattainable act as pressure cookers, where employees justify fraud as a coping mechanism.

Pillar II: Opportunities in a Digital, Hybrid World

Modern opportunities for fraud no longer look like unguarded safes; they exist in passwords, expense apps, and cloud folders.

  • The Remote Work Effect: Without the physical presence of colleagues and managers, the "ethical nudge" of being watched fades. Supervision is weaker, making it easier for small liberties—like misreported hours—to snowball.
  • Digital Systems: Tools designed for speed can be exploited by those tempted by the illusion of invisibility that complex digital processes create.
  • The Shadow World of Digital Payments: India’s UPI system and mobile wallets offer convenience but also speed up temptation. Fraudsters may use dummy IDs or obscure origin through multiple wallets, rationalizing it with the thought, “I’ll return it before anyone notices”.
  • Blurred Boundaries: Hybrid life leads to blurred ethics, such as downloading client data to a personal folder for convenience or using a corporate card for personal expenses with plans to fix it later.

Pillar III: Rationalization in the Age of Moral Flexibility

Rationalization is often the most dangerous force, where individuals tell themselves a story to justify wrong choices.

  • “Everyone’s Doing It”: Groupthink leads employees to believe unethical behaviour is simply "how things work" if they see others cutting corners without consequence.
  • “I’m Not Paid What I’m Worth”: Resentment over feeling overlooked or underpaid can lead individuals to view fraud as a form of self-awarded compensation.
  • “Why Should I Be Loyal When They Aren’t?”: If an organization breaks promises or dodges taxes, an employee’s moral compass may shift toward self-interest.
  • “Just This Once”: This is the most seductive rationalization, where a one-time exception (e.g., "I'll pay it back next month") turns into a pattern of small acts that escalate.

Actionable Insights for Fraud Prevention

Organizations must revisit internal controls and ethical frameworks, as reinforced by Section 177(9) of the Companies Act, 2013, and the ICAI Code of Ethics.

Table 1: Focus Areas and Practical Actions

Focus AreaPractical ActionsRelevant Standards/Laws
Expanding Red FlagsPay attention to behavioural changes (withdrawal, defensiveness) and shifts in tone during meetings; incorporate non-financial indicators into audit checklists.SA 240 (Revised)
Adapting Risk AssessmentsContinuously monitor digital access rights; enforce segregation of duties in remote teams; adjust monitoring for real-time digital flows (UPI).COSO Framework; ICAI Code of Ethics
Addressing RationalizationPromote leaders who model ethical choices; facilitate open dialogue regarding burnout and ethical dilemmas.Section 177(9) Companies Act; SEBI (LODR)
Reconnecting EthicsManagement/HR should foster psychological safety; integrate simple ethical checkpoints into everyday processes.ISO 37001; ICAI Guidance Note on Section 143(12)

The Role of Chartered Accountants

Fraud arrives quietly through decisions made under pressure. The job of a CA is not just to react but to help create organizations where fraud struggles to take root. This requires human insight beyond the numbers—understanding the human stories to build systems that protect both the organization and its people.

Conclusion

Fraud is evolving, and so must we. Staying ahead of white-collar crime requires reimagining our tools and our understanding of people. Fraud risk is a living, human system shaped by pressure, opportunity, and the stories we tell ourselves. In the end, the strongest controls are human, built on values rather than just rules. “The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars, but in ourselves.” — William Shakespeare, Julius Caesar.

References

  • ACFE Fraud Resources: https://www.acfe.com/fraud-resources/fraud-101-what-is-fraud
  • Companies Act, 2013 — Sections 177(9), 134(5), 143(12)
  • SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015
  • ICAI Code of Ethics, 2020
  • SA 240 (Revised): The Auditor’s Responsibilities Relating to Fraud
  • ICAI Guidance Note on Reporting under Section 143(12)
  • COSO Internal Control - Integrated Framework
  • ISO 37001 Anti-bribery Management Systems