Famous quotes

"Happiness can be defined, in part at least, as the fruit of the desire and ability to sacrifice what we want now for what we want eventually" - Stephen Covey

Showing posts with label The Korea Times. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Korea Times. Show all posts

Sunday, January 25, 2026

Korea India Strategic Partnership

 Based on the sources provided, here is the full text of the article:

Korea-India relations require long-term strategic cooperation, patience

By Song Kyung-jin

A Korea-India summit is expected soon, seven years after the last full-fledged bilateral summit in February 2019. Amid tumultuous geopolitical and geo-economic developments around the world, and given India is expected to become the world's fourth-largest economy in the first half of 2026, surpassing Japan, the importance of stronger Korea-India relations cannot be overstated. The two countries have not centered each other in their respective geopolitical and geo-economic maps. They have paid lip service to being natural partners without producing any concrete results. Current developments compel the two countries to finally change that, which requires multilayered and multidimensional efforts.

First and foremost, frequent meetings and exchanges between the leaders are crucial for building trust and expanding cooperation. This will invigorate cooperation at the ministerial, vice-ministerial and working levels that have been moribund for some time. The Korea-India Foreign Ministers’ Meeting, the 2+2 Vice-Ministerial Meeting of Foreign Affairs and Defense, and the National Security Councils’ meeting are barely functioning, held only intermittently. When India’s foreign minister, Subrahmanyam Jaishankar, visited Korea in 2024, then-president Yoon Suk Yeol did not even meet him, wasting a good opportunity to demonstrate Korea’s interest in India. The two current leaders need to nail down and regularize the existing meetings at the upcoming bilateral summit.

The same goes for people-to-people exchanges. Korea, known for its “ppali ppali” (hurry, hurry) tendency, and India, with its no-haste attitude, should respect each other’s characteristics and try to meet halfway. Patience and long-term commitment are rules of thumb. Take the example of Hanwha Aerospace, which has been successful in India by providing K9 Vajra howitzers and assisting in strengthening India’s defense capability. It spent a decade building trust with Indian authorities in partnership with a local defense producer, Larsen & Toubro. The lesson is that patience and long-term commitment with a credible Indian partner lays the foundation for drawing interest from India and initiating negotiations. Businesses entering the Indian market must also factor India’s increasing demand for localization into their investment portfolio.

India has significant critical minerals and rare earth reserves, which deserve the keen attention of resource-poor Korea. The two nations can take a pragmatic and rational approach to the mining and processing of rare earths; Korea can provide funding and technologies as well as a skilled workforce. In Korea-India relations, continued trade imbalance is a thorny issue that must be addressed to boost sustainable trade and investment. Korea's trade surplus against India amounted to $6.189 billion, with exports of $9.468 billion and imports of $3.279 billion as of mid-2025. It is a major roadblock, as upgrade negotiations for the Korea-India Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA) — underway since 2016 — have not made progress.

On top of bilateral issues, Korea should also be ready to engage in dialogue with India concerning global and regional issues, such as maritime security cooperation. Ninety percent of Korea’s economy is dependent on maritime trade and the overall stability of the Indo-Pacific. Thus, it should accelerate its maritime security cooperation with the Indian Ocean Rim Association countries as well as East Asian and Pacific nations. For stronger maritime security, the Maritime India Vision 2030 aims to make India the world’s 10th shipbuilding power by increasing its fleet to 2,500 and through large-scale investments in shipbuilding infrastructure. HD Hyundai and Samsung Heavy Industries have concluded memorandums of understanding for collaboration in shipbuilding and offshore plants in India on the back of that demand.

Another front for Korea-India cooperation is the Global South. India led the adoption of the Global South in the G20 in 2023. It was a transformation of the previous development agenda of the Seoul G20 in 2010 into the Global South. Korea has legitimate ownership of development and the Global South agenda in the G20. When Korea hosts the G20 in 2028, it should do its utmost for the G20 members to agree on concrete deliverables for the Global South, such as its adoption of artificial intelligence and digital transformation. Korea and India, successful in digital transformation, can together offer the Global South their technologies and resources for digital transformation. They also can fill the void created by the U.S. pulling its resources out of the Global South. Korea, India and African countries along the Indian Ocean can form triangular cooperation for development, especially in public health and digital transformation.

On the occasion of the upcoming bilateral summit, Korea should make clear its commitment to joining the International Solar Alliance, led by India and France, with over 110 member countries. It will fit nicely into the current Korean government's policy direction. In all of the above endeavors, government-to-government cooperation and nudging will make things go smoother and more promptly.

Song Kyung-jin is a senior fellow at the Asiatic Research Institute at Korea University.

Balancing between tech and labor

 Based on the sources provided, here is the full text of the article titled "Balance tech advancement with job creation" from The Korea Times:

ED | Balance tech advancement with job creation Hyundai Motor labor union protests announced deployment of humanoid robots Published Jan 23, 2026 3:41 pm KST | Updated Jan 23, 2026 4:34 pm KST

By issuing an official statement against employing humanoid robots at its plants, Hyundai Motor's massive labor union has pushed the possible friction between human and robot labor squarely into the public eye, an issue that many had not expected to arrive so soon. It is a good time to consider the future configuration of the labor market, which is already being influenced by artificial intelligence (AI).

“The introduction of AI robots is clearly aimed at cutting labor costs,” the union said in a statement on Thursday. “The union warns that not a single robot can be deployed at worksites without an agreement between labor and management”.

The union was referring to Atlas, a humanoid robot revealed at the CES tech fair earlier this month in Las Vegas. Made by Boston Dynamics, Atlas dazzled investors and observers with its ability to turn 360 degrees and lift up to 50 kilograms. It was clearly positioned as a future growth engine for the company and a moment to celebrate human progress in technology, however naively.

Hyundai Motor Group announced that it will deploy Atlas robots to Hyundai Motor Group Metaplant America (HMGMA) in the U.S. state of Georgia by 2028, with a plan to produce 30,000 units annually leading up to deployment.

Spurred on by anticipation, shares of Hyundai Motor rose, propelling it to become South Korea's third most valuable company this month. As investors, whatever the amount, workers who also have invested in Hyundai shares must feel split between the rise of share prices and the declining perspective of job stability. It's a dilemma that ensnares most workers in the tech-driven era.

The carmaker has not made public any plans for deployment at domestic plants in Korea, but the labor union is arguing both against the potential of humanoid robots being used at domestic plants, and that increased production at HMGMA would mean decreased production in Korea and result in a decline in local jobs.

In response, the carmaker said that the robots will concentrate mainly on repetitive and dangerous tasks human workers might want to avoid. It stressed that humanoid robots will improve labor efficiency.

The union is not buying it. “Under no circumstances will workers welcome the plan, as robot deployment will cause a huge employment shock,” the union said.

The average annual salary at Hyundai Motor and its related affiliates is estimated at around 130 million won ($88,599). Atlas, while currently priced at around $130,000 per unit, requires an estimated 14 million won for annual maintenance. Daily working time can reach up to 16 hours. The union is contending that the company will increasingly tilt toward the use of humanoid robot labor, which does not come with costs such as employee welfare and insurance benefits.

Progress in the field of physical AI has come very far in a very short amount of time. Investors are rallying behind Nvidia's self-driving automobiles and Tesla's robot taxis, as well as its humanoid robot Optimus. Chinese robot manufacturers are developing rapidly and reducing per unit production costs. The arrival of humanoid robots on factory floors may well be here. Instead of the militant battles of the past, the task for the company and the labor union will be to seek a win-win path, embracing technological advancement while continuing to create jobs.