South Korea’s Policy Adjustments Under Trump 2.0

 Under the second Trump administration, South Korea's trade and industrial policies have undergone significant recalibrations, characterized by high-stakes negotiations, massive investment commitments, and a "new normal" of transactional diplomacy.

The Trade Impasse and the $350 Billion Deal

South Korea initially faced severe trade pressure, becoming one of the FTA partners with the highest tariff rates. It was hit with 26 percent reciprocal tariffs on top of a 10 percent baseline, alongside 25 percent tariffs specifically on steel, automobiles, and auto parts.

To secure a reduction of these reciprocal and auto tariffs to 15 percent, South Korea agreed to a monumental US demand: investing US$350 billion in the United States. Key details of this agreement include:

• Scale: This amount exceeds South Korea’s combined foreign direct investment (FDI) from 2020 to 2024.
• Terms: The US retains the right to decide the investment sectors and will keep 90 percent of the profits within its borders.
• Sectoral Allocation: US$150 billion is dedicated to the shipbuilding sector, with the remaining US$200 billion allocated to other manufacturing at an annual rate of US$20 billion.
• Specific Pledges: Hyundai alone raised its planned US investment from US$21 billion to US$26 billion, covering steel, future industries, and the automotive sector.

Industrial "Renaissance" and Strategic Cooperation

South Korea is positioning itself as a vital partner in the US effort to bring about a "renaissance" in domestic manufacturing. This cooperation is particularly visible in three sectors:

• Shipbuilding: Under the "Make American Shipbuilding Great Again" (MASGA) initiative, the US is relying on South Korean giants like Hanwha Ocean, HD Hyundai, and Samsung Heavy Industries for technology and expertise. In return for these investments, South Korea received a long-sought "return gift": US approval to build a nuclear attack submarine.
• Semiconductors: Seoul secured guarantees for the semiconductor sector to maintain parity with global players like Taiwan, although recent US-Taiwan deals have cast doubt on South Korea's long-term edge.
• Diversification: To mitigate risks from US trade arbitrariness and declining exports to China, South Korea is attempting to diversify its trade towards OECD countries, India, and Southeast Asia.

Tech and Non-Tariff Barriers

A major point of friction involves South Korea's regulation of "Big Tech." The Trump administration perceives South Korean antitrust efforts, such as the Online Platform Monopoly Prohibition (OPMP) Act, as non-tariff barriers designed to target US companies.

• Regulatory Conflict: US pressure led President Lee Jae Myung to put certain digital service rules on hold or water them down to avoid friction in bilateral ties.
• Data and Security: A massive data breach at the US-registered retailer Coupang in November 2025 further strained relations when the company lobbied the US government to pressure South Korea to cease its probe.

The Context of Uncertainty

Despite reaching a final trade deal in October 2025, uncertainty remains a constant. President Trump has continued to use the threat of increasing tariffs (returning them to 25 percent) as a tactic to pressure the South Korean national assembly to formalize agreements. Furthermore, domestic US issues, such as ICE raids at Hyundai and LG battery plants, have impacted the mobility of South Korean workers and eroded public trust, with 80 percent of South Koreans expressing distrust due to the administration's global trade policies.

 Under the second Trump administration, technology regulation and antitrust enforcement have emerged as significant "non-tariff barriers" that the United States uses as leverage in its transactional relationship with South Korea. While South Korea has attempted to regulate Big Tech to ensure fair competition, these efforts have faced intense pushback from a U.S. administration that views such rules as targeted attacks on American companies.

The Regulatory Clash: OPMP Act

The primary source of friction is South Korea’s proposed Online Platform Monopoly Prohibition (OPMP) Act.

• South Korea's Intent: The government maintains that the act is necessary to promote innovation and market competitiveness by preventing tech giants from using market dominance to suppress competition.
• The U.S. Reaction: The Trump administration and U.S. digital service providers perceive the act as a non-tariff barrier. Reports suggest these competition-related policies could cost tech companies approximately US$525 billion, leading the U.S. to exert "intense pressure" on the South Korean administration.
• Outcome: Fearing that the issue would create critical friction in bilateral ties, President Lee Jae Myung put the legislative policies on hold and eventually watered down the digital services rules. This marks a shift from previous U.S. administrations, which typically did not use antitrust matters as explicit negotiation tactics.

Fines and Ongoing Disputes

U.S. tech companies like Google and Apple have long had an "inimical relationship" with South Korea’s antitrust watchdog, the Free Trade Commission (FTC).

• Google: The FTC fined Google US$177 million in 2021 for blocking Android customization and US$32 million in 2023 for misusing its gaming platform.
• Apple and Google: Both companies have faced scrutiny over mandatory in-app payments and their insistence on exporting high-precision map data, both of which South Korea deems violations of its antitrust regulations.

The Coupang Data Breach and Network Acts

A November 2025 data breach at Coupang, South Korea’s largest online retailer, further strained tech relations. Although it operates in Korea, Coupang is U.S.-registered, and the company lobbied the U.S. government to pressure South Korea to cease its investigation into the leak of 34 million accounts.

• U.S. Threats: Following the passage of the Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilisation and Protection Act in March 2026—which aimed to address deepfakes—U.S. officials, including Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, claimed the act was a sufficient reason for the U.S. to break its trade agreement with South Korea.

Strategic Adjustments

The Trump administration’s willingness to cancel trade meetings over tech regulations has forced South Korea into a defensive posture. In response to this "trade arbitrariness," South Korea's FTC has indicated that the country is exploring diversification towards OECD countries and other international organizations to reduce its export and regulatory dependence on the U.S.. Despite these attempts at autonomy, the broader policy under Trump 2.0 remains one where South Korean domestic tech regulations are often made subservient to the maintenance of the security and trade alliance.

Under the second Trump administration, foreign policy fractures between the United States and South Korea have widened significantly, driven by a radical shift in U.S. priorities toward an "isolationist" and transactional worldview. These fractures primarily manifest in three areas: differing perceptions of North Korea, divergent strategies regarding China, and the secondary impacts of U.S. unilateralism on South Korea's global interests.

The North Korea Priority Gap

The most stark fracture exists regarding North Korea’s nuclear program.

• Divergent Threat Perceptions: For South Korea, North Korea remains the top military threat, a view held by 90 percent of its citizens. Conversely, the Trump administration has largely downplayed the North Korean threat, omitting the country entirely from the 2025 National Security Strategy (NSS).
• Outsourcing Security: The U.S. now expects South Korea to handle the North Korean threat on its own, while simultaneously assisting the U.S. in broader Indo-Pacific security operations.

Strategic Divergence on China

While the U.S. has placed China at the center of its security strategy, South Korea does not view China as an existential threat.

• The "Strategic Entanglement" Risk: The U.S. seeks to use its military bases in South Korea (USFK) as launchpads for regional operations, including potential conflicts in the Taiwan Strait or South China Sea.
• South Korea's Balancing Act: South Korea is attempting to maintain a degree of strategic autonomy to avoid being pulled into conflicts unrelated to its immediate national security, fearing that aligning too closely with the U.S. "bandwagon" will alienate China and Russia and trigger a regional arms race.

Global Unilateralism and Secondary Fallout

South Korea’s status as a staunch U.S. ally has increasingly put its global economic and diplomatic interests in jeopardy due to U.S. unilateral actions.

• Retaliatory Damage: Past U.S. withdrawals from international agreements, such as the Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA), forced South Korea to freeze Iranian funds, leading to Iranian retaliation against South Korean products (e.g., Samsung) and the seizure of an oil tanker.
• The Rules-Based Order: The sources note that Trump’s actions often violate the international rules-based order, leaving South Korea’s silence to be perceived by other nations as an endorsement of illiberal behavior. This erodes South Korea's diplomatic standing and its ability to normalize ties with Russia or China.

Internal Policy Fractures: Alliance vs. Autonomy

The pressure from the Trump administration has split South Korean policymakers into two distinct camps:

• Alliance-First Camp: This group advocates for adjusting South Korean interests to accommodate the U.S. to ensure continued military and economic protection.
• Autonomy-First (South Korea First) Camp: This group advocates for cautious engagement, placing South Korean national interests at the center and questioning the long-term viability of an unpredictable alliance. This camp prioritizes the transfer of Wartime Operational Control (OPCON) to give Seoul full command over its military fate.

Burden Sharing and Strategic Flexibility

The transactional nature of the alliance is further strained by U.S. demands for massive increases in defense contributions. President Trump suggested South Korea's payment should rise from US$1.2 billion to US$10 billion annually. Additionally, the U.S. has pursued "strategic flexibility," which includes the potential for unilateral troop reductions—such as the reported shift of 4,500 troops in May 2025—without the traditional prior consultation with Seoul.

Under the second Trump administration, the U.S.-South Korea security alliance has entered a period of profound transition, shifting toward a transactional "modernization" that prioritizes burden-sharing and aligns with U.S. domestic industrial goals. While South Korea has secured significant strategic concessions, the alliance is increasingly defined by divergent threat perceptions and a new "Alliance First vs. Autonomy First" domestic debate.

The Burden-Sharing Impasse

A central pillar of "Trump 2.0" is the demand for significantly higher financial contributions from Seoul to maintain the U.S. Forces Korea (USFK).

• Special Measures Agreements (SMA): Despite a November 2024 agreement raising contributions for 2026–2030, President Trump publicly demanded an increase from US$1.2 billion to US$10 billion per year, labeling South Korea a "money machine".
• Strategic Flexibility: The administration has moved away from traditional consultative mechanisms regarding troop levels. In May 2025, reports surfaced that the U.S. intended to shift 4,500 troops from South Korea without prior consultation, reflecting a broader policy of "strategic flexibility" where the USFK could be used as a launchpad for regional operations, such as in the Taiwan Strait or South China Sea.

Divergent Security Priorities

The sources highlight a growing gap in how both nations perceive their primary security threats.

• The North Korea Gap: While 90 percent of South Koreans still view North Korea as their top military threat, the U.S. has notably downplayed this risk. The 2025 National Security Strategy (NSS) omitted North Korea entirely, signaling that the U.S. now expects Seoul to handle the North Korean threat independently while the U.S. focuses on China.
• The China Factor: The U.S. now places China at the center of the bilateral security conversation, pressuring Seoul to deter adversaries across the "first island chain". South Korea, however, seeks to maintain its strategic autonomy to avoid "strategic entrapment" in a conflict between the U.S. and China that does not directly involve its own interests.

Strategic Concessions and Shipbuilding

To maintain the alliance’s foundation, South Korea has leveraged its industrial strengths to provide the U.S. with strategic assistance.

• MASGA Initiative: South Korea is the primary contributor to the "Make American Shipbuilding Great Again" (MASGA) initiative, pledging US$150 billion to revive the U.S. merchant navy and naval fleet through partnerships with giants like Hanwha Ocean and HD Hyundai.
• The "Return Gift": In exchange for these massive industrial commitments and increased burden-sharing, Seoul secured long-standing demands, most notably U.S. approval to build a nuclear attack submarine and a commitment to the transition of Wartime Operational Control (OPCON) to South Korea.

The Domestic Policy Split

The pressure of Trump's "isolationist" and transactional worldview has split South Korean policymakers into two camps:

• Alliance-First Camp: Advocates for adjusting South Korean interests—including increased defense spending and closer alignment against China—to ensure the U.S. security umbrella remains intact.
• Autonomy-First Camp: Prioritizes South Korean interests, advocating for a "Plan B" that involves diversifying security partners and accelerating the OPCON transfer to take full command of the military and inter-Korean relations.

Ultimately, while South Korea has "doubled-down" on the alliance to secure short-term stability, the sources warn that this new template for partnership may carry long-term costs, including a regional arms race and the risk of South Korea's national interests being bartered in U.S. great-power negotiations.

Under the second Trump administration, shipbuilding cooperation has become a cornerstone of the "modernized" bilateral relationship, serving as both a strategic industrial bridge and a powerful tool for diplomatic leverage. Faced with a decaying domestic industry, the United States has turned to South Korea to spearhead the "Make American Shipbuilding Great Again" (MASGA) initiative.

The $150 Billion Commitment

As part of a broader $350 billion investment package intended to resolve trade impasses and lower tariffs, South Korea pledged US$150 billion exclusively to the U.S. shipbuilding sector. This strategic investment aims to revive the U.S. merchant navy and naval fleet while positioning South Korean firms deep within the U.S. defense industrial base.

The Role of the "Big Three" and Industry Leaders

The cooperation relies heavily on South Korea’s major shipbuilders to transfer expertise, technology, and skills to the U.S.. Key corporate actions include:

• Hanwha Ocean: Acquired the U.S.-based Philly Shipyard and committed US$5 billion to increase its capacity from building two vessels a year to 20 vessels a year, focusing on reviving the U.S. merchant navy.
• HD Hyundai: Partnered with Huntington Ingalls Industries to design and construct next-generation U.S. Naval ships and auxiliary fleets, while exploring joint investments in new U.S. facilities.
• Samsung Heavy Industries: Signed a memorandum of agreement with Vigor Marine Group to focus on the Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul (MRO) of U.S. Navy support vessels.
• Specialized Repair: Smaller firms like HJ Shipbuilding, SK Oceanplant, and K Shipbuilding have been engaged for master ship repair and maintenance of U.S. battleships.

Strategic Leverage and "Return Gifts"

South Korea has successfully used its shipbuilding prowess as strategic leverage in broader trade and security negotiations.

• Trade Concessions: This cooperation was a primary factor in the July 2025 deal that lowered U.S. reciprocal and auto tariffs from 26 percent to 15 percent.
• Security Breakthroughs: In what the sources describe as a "return gift" for these massive investments, the U.S. granted South Korea a long-standing demand: approval to build a nuclear attack submarine.
• Expanded Reach: The agreement also included U.S. approval for South Korea to increase its stake in Austal, an Australian shipbuilding company.

Modernizing the Alliance

Beyond mere construction, the two nations have established a shipbuilding working group to collaborate on workforce development, shipyard modernization, and supply chain resilience. This cooperation is a central element of President Lee Jae Myung's strategy to "modernize" the alliance, making it more reciprocal and future-oriented. However, the sources note that while this provides short-term security and economic stability, it also risks "strategic entanglement," signaling to China and Russia that South Korea is firmly on the U.S. "bandwagon," which could trigger a regional arms race.

The second Trump administration has significantly altered South Korea’s domestic political landscape, fanning ideological polarization and sparking a fundamental debate over the country’s strategic future.

The Rise of "Make Korea Great Again" (MKGA)

Trump’s "Make America Great Again" (MAGA) ideology has found a direct parallel in South Korea’s right-wing opposition, the People Power Party (PPP).

• Ideological Adoption: Supporters of the controversial former president Yoon Suk Yeol (impeached in December 2024) have adopted the slogan "Make Korea Great Again (MKGA)".
• Political Tactics: This faction has increasingly used far-right talking points and conspiracy theories to discredit the ruling Democratic Party of Korea (DPK), including unfounded accusations of links to the Chinese Communist Party.
• Social Impact: The "bonhomie" between MAGA and MKGA proponents has brought U.S.-style debates on gender and immigration into the South Korean mainstream, further splitting the country along progressive and conservative lines.

Public Distrust and "Trade Arbitrariness"

The transactional nature of "Trump 2.0" has eroded the traditional emotional bond between the two nations, leading to widespread public skepticism.

• Distrust Levels: An EAI poll revealed that 80 percent of South Koreans expressed a deeply unfavorable attitude toward the U.S., primarily citing Trump’s global trade policies as the reason for their distrust.
• Specific Triggers: Domestic outrage was fueled by the ICE detention of 300 South Korean workers at a Hyundai/LG plant in Georgia and perceived U.S. interference in South Korean investigations, such as the Coupang data breach. The U.S. government's pressure on South Korea to cease its probe into Coupang generated significant counter-pressure on the Seoul administration.

The Strategic Split: Alliance vs. Autonomy

The unpredictable nature of the alliance under Trump has forced a split in the South Korean policy community into two distinct camps:

• Alliance-First Camp: This group advocates for adjusting South Korean interests—including higher defense spending and closer alignment against China—to accommodate the U.S. and maintain its security umbrella.
• Autonomy-First Camp: This group prioritizes South Korean national interests, questioning the long-term reliability of a transactional partner. They advocate for strategic autonomy, the transfer of Wartime Operational Control (OPCON), and a "Plan B" focused on diversifying economic and security partners beyond the U.S..

Domestic Policy Subservience

The Trump administration's "intense pressure" has forced President Lee Jae Myung to make domestic policy concessions that have domestic political ramifications. For example, the administration was forced to water down digital services rules (the Online Platform Monopoly Prohibition Act) to avoid friction in bilateral ties, despite domestic calls for tech regulation. This has led to a perception that South Korean domestic economic and regulatory interests are being made subservient to the demands of the U.S. administration.

Under the second Trump administration, "modernizing" the alliance has become a strategic priority for President Lee Jae Myung, who aims to transform the relationship into a "more reciprocal and future-oriented" partnership in response to a changing security landscape. This modernization is characterized by South Korea providing significant concessions to align itself with the transactional and "isolationist" shift in U.S. policy.

Reciprocity through Industrial Integration

A core component of modernizing the alliance is South Korea's "doubling-down" on its role as a vital industrial and technological partner to the U.S..

• Economic Commitments: South Korea has committed to a massive US$350 billion investment package in the U.S. to resolve trade impasses and support a "renaissance" in American manufacturing.
• Strategic Shipbuilding: Modernization is heavily anchored in the "Make American Shipbuilding Great Again" (MASGA) initiative, with South Korea pledging US$150 billion to revive the U.S. naval and merchant fleet.
• Leverage: By integrating its "Big Three" shipbuilders into the U.S. defense industrial base, Seoul hopes to gain strategic leverage in future trade negotiations.

Security Concessions and New Strategic Templates

In exchange for its economic and industrial commitments, South Korea has secured significant "modernized" security guarantees.

• The "Return Gifts": Strategic breakthroughs include U.S. approval for South Korea to build a nuclear attack submarine and a commitment to the transition of Wartime Operational Control (OPCON), allowing Seoul more command over its military fate.
• Strategic Flexibility: The alliance is shifting its focus; while South Korea remains focused on North Korea, the U.S. is increasingly pressuring Seoul to take a larger role in deterring China and protecting the "first island chain".

The Challenges of an "Illiberal" Modernization

The sources suggest that this modernization comes with profound long-term risks and a "new normal" of uncertainty.

• Legitimizing Mercantilism: By agreeing to transactional trade terms, South Korea is seen as legitimizing the U.S.'s illiberal and mercantilist approach, potentially fragmenting international institutions like the WTO.
• Strategic Entrapment: Closer defense cooperation risks strategic entanglement, where South Korea may be pulled into regional conflicts (such as in the Taiwan Strait) that are unrelated to its immediate national interests.
• The "Plan B" Debate: The unpredictable nature of the alliance has forced South Korean policymakers to re-evaluate their assumptions, with some scholars advising the government to prepare a "Plan B" focused on diversifying economic and security partners beyond the U.S..

Ultimately, while South Korea has secured its short-term interests through these modernization efforts, the sources warn that establishing a template where national interests are made subservient to the alliance could carry high long-term costs, including a regional arms race and alienated relations with China and Russia.

Mint Newspaper Summary 270626

 The following is the reproduced article titled "Sugarcane Tigers," written by Anuj Behal for the June 27, 2026 edition of the Mint Lounge.

---

SUGARCANE TIGERS

In the sugarcane fields of Pilibhit, where tigers now live and hunt beyond the forest, women farm workers navigate a landscape shaped by predator conflict, precarious labour and constant panic

By Anuj Behal

About a month ago, around 6 in the morning, when the sun had only just begun to press its heat into the fields of Pilibhit in Uttar Pradesh, Chameli Devi, 60, stepped out for rakhwali—her daily work of keeping watch over the standing crop, warding off stray cattle, nilgai, and whatever else the forest might send into the fields. The wheat, brushing against the edge of the forest fence, stood ready for harvest.

That morning, the fields somehow felt hostile. Then a low, guttural roar cut through the stillness. Chameli froze. About 15 metres ahead, well inside the field but partly concealed between the standing wheat and the thinning tree line, stood a tiger. “It was almost camouflaged in the cereal grass,” she says. “It was only when I looked closely, in the direction of the sound, that the black stripes began to stand out”.

“The roar hit me like a bolt, right there, under my feet. I just made sure I didn’t lose my calm.” Years of working these lands had taught her how to hold her ground, even when the boundary between the forest and field dissolves without warning. She stood still—until the tiger turned away. Only then did Chameli break into a run, fleeing the farm.

Encounters like Chameli’s are not rare here; if anything, they are part of the rhythm of life in the Pilibhit forest belt. Located in the Terai belt, the region forms part of the Terai Arc Landscape, with the Pilibhit Tiger Reserve anchoring this network through its sal forests and grasslands. However, the landscape is frayed. Cultivation has steadily replaced what was once wild, and the proximity between a shrinking forest and expanding agriculture has made such encounters increasingly common.

ONLY LABOUR, NO OWNERSHIP

Although the household income from farming is largely handled by Anjali’s husband, the acre of land that they cultivate belongs to neither of them. It is registered in the name of his mother, Chameli Devi, who for the last 10 years has been working as a guard on fields owned by others. The work is relentless. “You have to keep moving,” Chameli says, describing the slow, circular patrols along the edges and through the middle of the field.

Over the years, as her two sons married and started families of their own, the small parcel of 2 acres effectively passed into their hands. Chameli now works as labour in the fields of a Sikh farmer from a family that settled in the Terai as part of post-Partition rehabilitation. For an entire cropping cycle—nearly six months from sowing to harvest—Chameli is paid in grain: roughly seven quintals, amounting to barely ₹17,000-20,000 for half-a-year’s work.

WORK CAN’T STOP

With the rising tiger population spilling into the fields, the uncertainty of an encounter with a tiger has become part of everyday farm work. Pilibhit’s tiger population rose from around 25 in 2014 to nearly 65 by 2018, and estimates in 2025 approach 100 tigers including surrounding sugarcane fields as shelter.

“If it weren’t for sugarcane, you wouldn’t find tigers in the Terai’s villages,” says Rahul Shukla, a tiger conservationist. “Its height gives them the cover and camouflage they need”. Some tigers have made the cane fields part of their permanent range, a learned behavior passed across generations.

“A tiger can appear anywhere... But you can’t stop going to the fields. If we don’t grow, what will we eat?” asks Anjali Devi, 32. Although agriculture accounts for over 61.87% of female work participation in the district, women are rarely independent farmers; they typically work alongside family members on small plots or in casualised roles for large landholders. Even when they work the land, the labor rarely translates into control over income, as final financial decisions are usually taken by husbands.

WHEN THE TIGER WALKS OUT

Pilibhit’s main challenge to coexistence is tigers leaving protected areas. Over 60 people have been killed in tiger encounters in the area since 2010. With over 80% of the population dependent on agriculture, the risk is embedded in everyday work.

Women live in a state of perpetual anxiety of losing a loved one and their livelihood. As mechanization takes over, women are often "relegated to primitive, non-technological and nonwage subsistence tasks," such as guarding fields.

THE OTHER MIGRATION

Pilibhit is home to nearly 1.25 lakh people of Bengali origin, many of whom arrived between 1958-74 as refugees. Unlike the Sikh farmers who consolidated large landholdings, many Bengali refugees were settled on smaller agricultural plots under lease arrangements. For decades, they were denied pattas (ownership documents), restricting their access to institutional credit and security.

SEEKING WORK ELSEWHERE

In Neoria Colony, Anita Biswas, 30, rolls beedis for a local contractor to avoid the tigers in the fields. For every 1,000 beedis, she earns ₹170. “It’s not much,” she says, “but at least there is no tiger in this work”. Her aunt, Parul Rai, was killed in a tiger attack in February.

Due to the irregular work and danger in Pilibhit, Anita and her husband migrate to Andhra Pradesh and Telangana twice a year for farm work. While they earn barely ₹350-450 a day locally, they can together make ₹900-1,200 a day in the south, totaling up to ₹100,000 over a single cycle.

EVERYDAY ANXIETIES

Fear reshapes everyday routines. Because of erratic electricity, irrigation often happens in the middle of the night. When the danger is high, husbands usually go out, leaving wives on tenterhooks. Women bear the long-term psychological burden of living with the constant possibility of loss or injury.

RESOLVING CONFLICT

The Bagh Mitra programme, introduced in 2019, trains villagers as first responders to verify sightings and calm rumours. However, most Bagh Mitras are male landholders who have the time and social standing to participate. Of nearly 200 Bagh Mitras, only a handful are women.

Conservationists suggest that a long-term solution may require rethinking land use, such as replacing sugarcane with crops that do not provide ideal tiger habitat. For now, efforts focus on coordinated harvesting schedules and community awareness.

As Chameli Devi notes while reflecting on her work: “For now, we look for tigers only to stay alive in the fields”.

The following is the reproduced article titled “Climate change spurs search for new coffees,” written by Aravinda Anantharaman for the June 27, 2026 edition of the Mint Lounge.

---

CLIMATE CHANGE SPURS SEARCH FOR NEW COFFEES

As weather patterns change, and demand for coffee rises, estates are developing Indian heirloom species

By Aravinda Anantharaman

In Coorg’s Mooleh Manay estate there’s a tree species that has been around for as long as anyone can remember. They call it Excelsa. For decades, it served as a boundary tree, shielding coffee plants from fertiliser drift from neighbouring estates. It produced a small volume of beans, which the family processed for their own use. It remained a border plant, and not much else. The same was true of several estates across the region.

Coffee, for the most part, has meant just two species: Arabica and Robusta. And yet, there are over 133 species in the world. Coffea arabica accounts for about 55-60% of global production, followed by Coffea canephora (Robusta) at roughly 40-45%. Less than 1% comes from Liberica, Excelsa and other minor species combined.

As weather patterns grow increasingly unpredictable, coffee cultivation has become more uncertain. A February report by Climate Central states that temperatures beyond 30 degrees Celsius are harmful for growing Arabica and suboptimal for Robusta, while annual rainfall of 59-79 inches is optimal. The report focused on the top 5 coffee producers—together showed an annual average of 47 extra hot days.

Arabica requires cooler climates and Robusta depends on reliable rainfall. With both under stress, the question now is what happens if these plants are pushed beyond their limits. “We always look at climate from a negative perspective,” says Marc Tormo, co-founder, Coffee Ideas, promoting Indian speciality coffee. “But there are plants that actually do better in hotter conditions”.

It is against this backdrop that Excelsa and Liberica are drawing attention. Until recently, Excelsa was grouped with Coffea liberica; in 2025, it was reclassified as a separate species and the former Coffea liberica var. dewevrei is now Coffea dewevrei. The Coorg-Sakleshpur belt in Karnataka has long been home to these species. “Excelsa was never traded like Arabica or Robusta because there was no exchange to price it,” says Komal Sable, who manages Mooleh Manay and runs the South India Coffee Company (SICC) with her husband, Akshay Dashrath. “Many Indian farms had Excelsa at the borders... While Excelsa has been harvested on our estate since the 1940s, it remained largely overlooked for decades”.

In 2017, Sable and Dashrath began taking a closer interest in the species. “No matter what the weather was like, these trees were doing okay,” she recalls. “No one paid much attention to them, they weren’t pruned and no fertiliser was applied. Despite this neglect, they continued to grow and produce a consistent, medium yield”. Both Mooleh Manay and Salawara are now distributing these plants to other estates, encouraging wider adoption.

Around the same time, Akshay Vaidyanathan started the Chennai-based roastery Kāpikottai. He arrived at Mooleh Manay to understand the coffee landscape. The Excelsa stood out. “This was the coffee no one had heard of,” he says. “I saw the trees... The climate story resonated. And the cup was compelling—fruity, punchy, with lower perceived bitterness”. In 2020, he began selling speciality grade Excelsa, a first in India. From the start, it found takers, partly because the quantities were small and partly because some consumers were actively looking for something new. “Time has done its thing,” he adds. Demand now outpaces supply.

At Salawara estate in Chikkamagaluru, third-generation planter Sharan Gowda began working with Liberica and Excelsa five-six years ago. “No one really knew the difference between them,” he says. Like Excelsa, Liberica grew as a tree, often on lower slopes, and was either consumed at home or blended into commercial Robusta lots. Harvesting, however, was a deterrent: “The trees are tall, often covered with red ants. No one wants to deal with that,” he says. On many estates, they were cut down during fencing or electrification. Prices, he adds, could improve if the trees were harvested and sold separately, pointing to Liberica-focused estates in countries like Vietnam.

Another early responder to these coffees was Mumbai-based speciality coffee brand, Subko, offering it both as a brewed beverage in their cafe and as beans. Says founder Rahul Reddy, “The initial response was confusion—in the best way—from staff and customers. Folks at the time were barely understanding the difference between Arabica and Robusta and to introduce this third species, with many sub-species, it highlighted the complexity of the genetics of coffee”.

That’s just the sort of thing India’s speciality coffee consumers love. With the market for fine coffee maturing, both Excelsa and Liberica are emerging not as alternatives to Arabica or Robusta but as newer coffees to try. Their appeal lies not just in flavour—fruity and sweet—but also in the benefits to the farmer. Where Arabica and Robusta are harvested at approximately six and nine months, respectively, these species take 11-13 months to mature. This staggered cycle is a huge benefit for farmers offering an extended harvest calendar.

Tormo is experimenting with Canephora, Liberica and Excelsa in hot, humid conditions. Alongside these are lesser-known species like Wightiana, which grows well in the Coromandel coast, and Stenophylla, a species originally from Sierra Leone that grows at low altitudes and higher temperatures. “It is a delicate and delicious coffee,” says Tormo. “Climate change is shifting attention toward underutilised Coffea species, not as replacements for Arabica but as complementary genetic resources that may help build a more resilient future for coffee”.

Reddy echoes the thought when he says, “Excelsa and Liberica are typically described as somewhere in between funky Arabica and a Robusta in terms of flavour profile but honestly it doesn’t fit into either category—it’s entirely its own profile”.

At the annual India International Coffee Festival earlier this year, a species-focused cupping featuring these coffees drew a favourable response. Awards have started to trickle in; a Mooleh Manay Excelsa recently placed third at the National Barista Championship.

India is also home to several other heirloom species—Bengalensis, Travancorensis and Malabarensis. Excelsa and Liberica’s early success have encouraged attention toward these. “For a species to survive, it has to be viable for the planters; it can’t be a commodity,” says Gowda. It needs good prices.

Climate change has not been easy for Indian coffee, but it has pushed planters toward experimentation. A growing consumer base, asking for traceability and variety, is certainly helping that shift. For now, these coffees remain limited in quantity, often naturally processed and positioned as speciality offerings. They are unlikely to replace or supplant Arabica or Robusta. But as conditions continue to change, the future of coffee may well include what used to be a border plant.

Aravinda Anantharaman (@aravindaananth) is a Lounge columnist.

The following is the article titled “What food cults say about us / Your food obsession could be your personality test,” written by Smitha Menon for the June 27, 2026 edition of the Mint Lounge.

---

WHAT FOOD CULTS SAY ABOUT US

Your food obsession could be your personality test

By Smitha Menon

It’s almost innocuous when it starts: perhaps it began when you first corrected someone’s butter chicken recommendation. Or when you started compiling a Notes app list of the thalis you’ve eaten, and places you still need to visit. Maybe it’s the way you feel an irrational pride when someone you’re with orders the dish you always order. You didn’t join on purpose, but before you knew it, you were part of one. That’s the thing about food cults: nobody hands you a membership card. You just wake up one day, and you’re in.

For me, it started with Diet Coke. Now, I’ve never been a Diet Coke fan, but strangely, during my pregnancy, it was one of those things I dreamed about constantly. That crisp, refreshing taste, coupled with the sweetness and caffeine: my brain romanticised washing... months, I was thrilled. I knew then that I was a convert.

For those in the know, Diet Coke scratches a very specific itch. Anaheez Patel, a nutrition and fitness creator and fellow Diet Coke enthusiast, described it to me as a “perfectly engineered sensory event”: the pssst when you open the can; a freezing cold hit; a sharp acidic bite right after you eat something indulgent and need to wash it down. Per Patel, it’s unmatched.

She isn’t the only one who thinks so: Delhi and Mumbai have both recently hosted Diet Coke parties, with Gen Z turning up in DC-coded merch to drink cola spiked with pickles and chaat masalas, with zero involvement from the brand itself. What started as an Instagram gag became a real, sold-out event: a community organised entirely around a shared love for a fizzy drink. To me, these parties feel less like endorsements of a particular beverage and more like the performance of membership of a very specific cultural tribe.

...extensively about how taste, the things we consume, the way we consume them, the preferences we display, functions as a form of social currency. He called this cultural capital: the idea that what you choose to eat, drink, wear or listen to signals your position within a social field, often more powerfully than...

In India, we know that this obsession around specific foods and drinks isn’t limited to a cola brand. Start talking about the best phuchka, mishti or rolls in Kolkata and watch tempers flare. ...other sub-groups in pop culture, our food preferences, like Meghana vs Nagarjuna biryani in Bengaluru, all signal a very #IYKYK vibe. They are personality markers that require a certain kind of cultural fluency to understand, and that fluency is part of the point.

In Mumbai, the debate around Trishna’s butter garlic crab is an evergreen one. While some folks in the city frequent the seafood restaurant almost every weekend just for this dish, others swear by seafood institutions like Gajalee and Chaitanya. As Trishna’s most famous branch in the city is in Kala Ghoda, the subtext around it is that it’s a tourist hotspot (owing to its proximity to the heritage neighbourhood), and not a local favourite.

Even your pani puri allegiance says more about you than you’d think. Bandra’s Elco signals a certain caution: they famously use Bisleri, which makes them the safe, widely known choice. Not too far away is Punjab Sweet House. Patronage here suggests you’re more fluent with the city’s food scene; unbothered by the absence of gloves and distilled water, you chase taste and flavour. This logic extends to butter chicken in Delhi. Whether you get your butter chicken fix... same is the case for Bangaloreans and their choice of darshinis. Each cult has its own rituals and behaviours.

Being in the know feels good. That’s the whole point of the cult: the rituals and the sense of belonging. But food preferences don’t always build a community, they also draw borders. In the context of food, these lines get drawn constantly, often with the subtext of religion, class and caste. As friendly as it may seem, the conversation between a Nakur purist and the Balaram Mullick fan then isn’t only a debate of two different sweets, they are claims about the kind of person they are, and, by extension, the kind of person the other isn’t.

Das has seen this “friendly othering” play out in his hometown of Chandannagar in West Bengal. The city is famous for its jol bhora sandesh, a sweet filled with liquid date palm jaggery, that was invented by the proprietor Surjya Kumar Modak. The family has since set up a number of stores around the city, and a person is judged based on which shop they frequent. “There’s only one right answer,” he laughs, with the certainty of someone who has navigated many such debates, “and it’s not the one that’s Insta-famous.” Knowing the right...

The following is the reproduced article titled “Migration and identity define this World Cup,” written by Shrenik Avlani for the June 27, 2026 edition of the Mint Lounge.

---

MIGRATION AND IDENTITY DEFINE THIS WORLD CUP

Players born in one country and representing another highlight football’s ability to transcend politics

By Shrenik Avlani

The phrase “Football Unites the World” is embroidered on the armband of team captains at this summer’s FIFA World Cup. Before the football even kicked off, quite a few would have frowned at the irony of the phrase. After all, a top African referee from Somalia, after he landed in the US, was denied entry by the host nation. Footballers were held back for hours for questioning at American airports. Canada denied visas to a couple of players. The Iranian football team, because of the war waged by the US and Israel, was forced to shift its base to Mexico. Fans from several participating nations, mostly from Africa, face President Donald Trump’s travel bans.

Despite the polarised times we live in, once footballers took the field and the action kicked off, the multicultural and diverse nature of the sport has been on full display at each and every game. In Philadelphia, the Manchester-born Zidane Iqbal, named after the French football legend Zinedine Zidane by his Pakistani father and Iraqi mother, turned out in the whites of Iraq on 22 June against a French team whose creative heart is the... New York New Jersey Stadium, the superstar Erling Haaland, born in England’s Leeds, was scoring goals for Norway against Senegal’s Édouard Mendy, who is a French citizen by birth but plays football for Senegal. The tournament’s opening goal scored by Mexico’s Julián Quiñones was already an apt statement of this diversity: Quiñones is a Colombian by birth and gained Mexican citizenship by naturalisation in 2023.

Run a rule through any team sheet for this edition of the tournament, you will find all of them overflowing with stories of migration, identity and assimilation. Granit Xhaka, the leader of the Swiss contingent, was born in Switzerland to immigrant parents from Kosovo. Japanese goalie Zion Suzuki, a standout performer in the group stages and being tracked by top European clubs, was born in the US to a Japanese mother and Ghanaian father. Suzuki could have turned out for any of the three nations and chose to be... [Cape] Verde... as they were born outside the West African island nation—including six in the Netherlands, four in Portugal, three in France and one each in the US and Ireland. About one in four of the 1,248 players in this year’s World Cup was born outside the country they play for. In the previous edition in Qatar, this was the case with 16.8% of the players.

Some have quite cor[rectly]... members could have chosen to play for 20 other national teams—a choice that Germany’s Jamal Musiala and Felix Nmecha, US’s Folarin Balogun, Democratic Republic of Congo’s Aaron Wan-Bissaka, Austria’s Carney Chukwuemeka, Scotland’s Scott McTominay and Tyler Fletcher and many others have already exercised. On 23 June, England played a goalless draw against Ghana, whose attacking talisman is the England-born Antoine Semenyo.

Spain is another nation overflowing with footballing talent, and so it comes as no surprise that several Spanish players have chosen to represent the nation of their ethnicity. Achraf Hakimi and Brahim Diaz were both born in Spain but are winning plaudits for Morocco, while the Argentinian rising star Nico Paz was born in Tenerife. Basque-born Inaki Williams is playing for Ghana while his younger brother Nico is a star in the talented Spanish side.

Just like in the case of Spain and England, another former colonising country, the Netherlands, is an incubator of talented footballers. All but one of Curacao’s 26-man World Cup squad were born in the Netherlands. The only one born in Curaçao—who held Ecuador to a 2-2 draw on 21 June prompting the Dutch royal family to visit the team’s locker room for post-game praise—is the former Manchester United midfielder Tahith Chong. Curacao’s manager is also a Dutchman, the 78-year-old Dick Advocaat.

But the biggest exporter of footballers by far at the World Cup is France, another former coloniser. Apart from the 26 multicultural Frenchmen representing the Les [Bleus]... [Zin]edine Zidane’s goalie son, Luca, appearing for Algeria, and double Champions League winner Désiré Doué’s elder brother Guéla Doué, who is playing for the Ivory Coast. In fact, France’s first opponents in the group stages, Senegal, had 10 Frenchmen in the squad.

FIFA does have strict rules about footballers appearing for different nations. Once a player appears for a nation in a senior competitive match, they cannot appear for any other national team. Those who represent a country in age group competitions and in senior friendlies are allowed to switch following a formal application to FIFA. But this rule doesn’t extend to managers.

Of the 48 participating teams, 27 are led by foreign managers. Thomas Tuchel, a German, is in charge of England while Graham Potter, an Englishman, is leading the Swedes; Argentina’s Mauricio Pochettino is the man in the dugout for Team US; co-hosts Canada have engaged the services from across the border in former US footballer Jesse Marsch; Australian Graham Arnold is coaching the Iraqi team; Italian legend Carlo Ancelotti is the first non-Brazilian to manage the Selecao. This despite the fact that no foreign manager has ever won a World Cup.

So while it is downright farcical for the fossil fuel-promoting and sports-washing FIFA to call for global unity, it is also true that football’s modern avatar would not be possible without immigration and multiethnic and religious nations. No matter which country lifts the trophy at the New York New Jersey Stadium on 19 July, football is indeed uniting the world.

The following is the reproduced article titled “GDP growth view brightens as US-Iran war tensions ease,” written by Subhash Narayan for the June 27, 2026 edition of the Mint Lounge.

---

GDP GROWTH VIEW BRIGHTENS AS US-IRAN WAR TENSIONS EASE

Goldman Sachs’ upgrade comes after India weathered the West Asia war impact better than expected

By Subhash Narayan

Goldman Sachs raised its forecast for India’s 2026 gross domestic product (GDP) growth by 30 basis points (bps) to 6.8%, lowered the inflation view by 20 bps to 4.4%, and trimmed its current account deficit estimate from 1.3% to 1.1% of GDP.

In a research note released on Friday, the investment bank said India’s economic outlook has improved materially following the US-Iran peace deal, with lower crude oil prices reducing inflationary pressures, easing fiscal risks and strengthening the country’s external balances.

Also on Friday, accounting and consultancy major EY, in its latest Economy Watch report, projected India’s real GDP growth at 6.6-6.8% for FY27, noting that stabilizing energy markets will ease supply-side pressures to support both growth and inflation outcomes this year.

Goldman Sachs’ upgrade comes after India weathered the West Asia war impact better than expected, aided by fiscal and quasi-fiscal measures that absorbed a significant portion of the energy price shock and limited the passthrough of higher fuel costs to consumers, the note said. “India’s real GDP growth has held up better than our earlier expectations,” Goldman Sachs said, noting that the economy expanded 7.8% year-on-year in the first quarter of calendar 2026, about 50 bps above its earlier forecast.

For Goldman Sachs, this latest upgrade caps a highly volatile series of forecast revisions throughout 2026. On 9 February, the investment bank had projected a strong 6.9% growth for the calendar year, citing resilient economic momentum despite challenges such as the stiff US tariffs. However, the outbreak of the US-Iran war quickly reversed this optimism, prompting a cut to 6.5% early March, followed by a sharper cut to 5.9% on 24 March.

As geopolitical conditions slowly began to stabilize ahead of the peace deal, the firm partially restored the forecast to 6.5%, before finally lifting it to the latest projection of 6.8% following the formal peace agreement.

Rishi Shah, partner and economic advisory services leader at Grant Thornton Bharat, said, “The upward revision to 6.8% for CY2026 is directionally consistent with what India’s domestic fundamentals warrant, and validates the point that this slowdown was always about exogenous energy shocks, not structural weakness. The easing of oil prices, fiscal risks and inflation pressures following the peace talks is welcome relief. However, I would caution against anchoring to any single forecast in what remains a deeply volatile environment”.

The stronger-than-expected growth was led by resilient investment activity and robust services sector performance, said Goldman’s note. Gross fixed capital formation rose to a six-quarter high of 10.8% year-on-year during the quarter, supported by healthy automobile production and stronger imports of investment goods despite supply-chain disruptions linked to the Gulf conflict.

Goldman Sachs said the US-Iran agreement has significantly reduced downside risks to the economy by lowering crude prices and easing supply constraints that had weighed on investment activity.

The following is the reproduced article titled “Robotics startup funding doubles in 2026, scale lags,” written by Nabodita Ganguly for the June 27, 2026 edition of the Mint Lounge.

---

ROBOTICS STARTUP FUNDING DOUBLES IN 2026, SCALE LAGS

Indian robotics startups raised only $52.9 million in 2025

By Nabodita Ganguly

Funding for India's robotics start-ups almost doubled to $42.1 million in the first six months of 2026 from $22.7 million in the comparable span last year, with the average cheque size up 94.4% over the period, data platform Tracxn said. The funding was $35.8 million in the first half of 2024.

While the rise in funding signals growing momentum, experts said it is still early days for robotics in India. In 2025, the country's robotics startups raised less than 1% of the capital secured by their US peers and about 2% of the amount raised in China, Tracxn said. Experts attributed the renewed investor interest to the maturing of technology.

“As global pioneers approach public markets and demonstrate commercial success, a new generation of founders has gained confidence to build the next technology stack,” said Bhaskar Majumdar, founder of Unicorn India Ventures, an early-stage venture capital firm. The latest example is US humanoid robotics startup Agility Robotics, which said earlier this month it plans to go public through a SPAC merger at a valuation of about $2.5 billion, highlighting growing investor confidence.

Experts argued the increase in Indian government initiatives has also helped. Schemes such as Make in India, production-linked incentives, and the push to reduce reliance on concentrated global supply chains, coupled with the growing global acceptance of Indian innovation, are driving investors towards deep tech sectors such as robotics. They said demand will only increase.

“Most of these companies are at an inflection point. They spent seven or eight years building the business, but hardly anyone funded them,” said Sumeet Seraf, founder of Equity 360, an investment banking and financial advisory firm. “Now, once they get that funding, these companies can see a J-curve kind of growth from here. If that happens, someone has to do a second round of funding, then a third round”.

On the increase in the average cheque size from $1.8 million in 2025 to $3.5 million so far in 2026, experts said that is not sufficient to draw conclusions about an entire sector. “One explanation is that the ecosystem is maturing, and companies have reached stages where larger amounts of capital are required to execute their growth plans,” added Majumdar. “It also depends on the quality and nature of investment opportunities available during a given period. Therefore, it would be premature to conclude that investors are simply becoming more selective”.

Amid the optimism, India’s robotics startups continue to lag global peers, raising only $52.9 million in 2025, compared with $5.6 billion raised by US counterparts and $2.7 billion by Chinese startups. Founders argue that building robotics products in India is challenging because many components are still imported.

“Many of the specialized components used inside the robot are not available from Indian manufacturers. That’s one of the biggest challenges we face,” said Rohit Ranjan, founder and chief executive of NeoGenTech, a startup that has built a female humanoid robot. “I have spent almost ₹8-10 lakh on components alone. If a component costs ₹20,000, importing it from the US or China increases the cost to ₹35,000-40,000”.

Even technically strong founders often struggle with go-to-market strategies and with rapidly testing and iterating in real manufacturing environments, experts argued.

Mint Newspaper Summary 260626

 

Trippy creativity

mint primer

How did Mumbai turn our data centre hub?

Mumbai has a 53% share of India’s data centre capacity. It has multiple subsea cable landing stations, and its status as the financial capital with a robust technology ecosystem has created strong demand for secure, high-capacity infrastructure. Reliable power, government incentives and land availability in Navi Mumbai have helped.

Global cloud providers like AWS, Microsoft and Google chose Mumbai as their hub to support various tasks such as advanced AI workloads, e-commerce, banking and media. Its connectivity and ecosystem make Mumbai indispensable, despite growing concerns about water scarcity.

India’s super rich in a hunt for the next SpaceX

By Salman S.H. Bengaluru

Indian family offices and wealthy investors are widening their bets on private US frontier-technology and artificial intelligence (AI) companies after the SpaceX initial public offering (IPO) gave them a clearer sense of the scale of returns and the size of the market. These investors bet privately on SpaceX through wealth managers and structured deals, using special purpose vehicles (SPVs) and funds. The paper returns on SpaceX-linked bets range from 20x to 100x, but these gains will remain unrealized until positions are unwound after the lock-in period ends.

Viram Shah, chief executive officer (CEO) and co-founder of Vested Finance, said some Indian investors who entered SpaceX through its platform are doing well on paper. He pointed to two funds done last year at $45 and $50 per share, which are now roughly 2-3x on paper. The SpaceX IPO, priced at $75 billion at a $1.77 trillion valuation, emerged as the biggest listing in history and reset expectations around what private-market winners can become.

“There is tremendous interest in the space of unlisted investments outside India, especially in the US,” said Gautami Gavankar, president of Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. She said Indian investors are betting on AI, defence tech, semiconductors and autonomous technology. “This is an evolved-investor trend, where wealthy Indian clients, including family offices and UHNIs, are increasingly willing to go offshore for differentiated opportunities,” she said.

Industry executives and people familiar with the deals said the next wave of Indian interest is shifting beyond the cluster of large language model (LLM) companies to names such as Stripe, Whoop, Revolut, Shield AI, Anduril, Epic Games and Kraken.

FOMO and Diversification Demand is not limited to a few marquee AI names and has risen sharply over several months, driven by fear of missing out on the global AI and technology rally, particularly in the US, according to Yogesh Kalwani, head of investment at InCred Wealth. “We are seeing interest across a broader basket of US frontier-tech companies spanning AI, defence tech, semiconductors, autonomy and other use-cases where AI is being applied, not just the large language model layer,” Kalwani said. He noted that relatively muted returns from Indian markets over the past two years have also pushed wealthy clients to diversify globally.

Average ticket sizes for individual Indian investors have largely remained in the range of $150,000 to $200,000, while family office investments can easily run into the $50 million to $100 million range. Viram Shah noted participation from family offices in Bengaluru, Mumbai, and Delhi, as these investments provide a way to enter at an earlier stage of value creation.

The appeal is especially strong for companies like:

• Whoop: Fitness tracking company last valued at about $10 billion.
• Revolut: Fintech firm valued at $75 billion in a late-2025 capital raise.
• Shield AI: Defence-tech company valued at $12.7 billion in its latest funding round.
• Epic Games: Video game company valued between $28.7 billion and $31.5 billion in past rounds.

Investment Structures and Exit Challenges Investors typically look for secondary-market opportunities through pooling vehicles set up offshore by fund managers or specialist administrators. These SPVs or offshore funds pool money from multiple investors to buy into a targeted company. The structure is typically long-duration and illiquid, with exits depending on future secondary sales, acquisitions, or public listings.

Exit timing is usually determined by the fund manager, who must balance lock-in periods and regulatory requirements. Even after an IPO, the money does not return in one shot; only a small portion of locked-up stock becomes free after the first earnings report, with more shares becoming available for redemption over a 180-day period.

Refiners eye concessions with Iran oil ready to flow

Rising global oil supplies may trigger concessions, deferred payments

By Rituraj Baruah New Delhi

As a temporary US sanctions waiver revives the prospect of large-scale Iranian crude imports into India once again, local refiners expect Tehran to offer sweeter terms—deferred payments and longer credit periods—to regain share in the world’s third-largest oil-consuming nation.

As Indian refiners await clarity on the payment mechanism and the long-term durability of the US-Iran peace talks, they may not rush for immediate procurement of Iranian crude. Instead, they are taking a more long-term approach to ensure supplies when sanctions are permanently waived.

Sanctions Waiver and Recent Trade The developments follow a 60-day sanctions waiver issued by the US Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) on June 22, permitting the production, sale, and transport of Iranian crude and petroleum products until August 21. India had already imported about 133,000 barrels per day of Iranian crude in April following an earlier 30-day sanctions waiver announced in March.

Before US sanctions hit in 2019, Iran was among India’s top five crude suppliers. In FY10, it shipped 22.1 million tonnes of oil to India—about 14% of the country's total imports. Today, however, Iran seeks to re-enter a market crowded with increasing supplies from Venezuela and West Africa, while Russian crude continues to dominate India’s import basket with discounts of up to $5 a barrel.

Expectations for Concessions Indian refiners view Iranian crude as logistically convenient and familiar, but any significant return will depend on commercial attractiveness. Refiners are looking for concessions such as longer credit periods; before sanctions, Iran offered up to 90 days, compared with the roughly one-month terms typically extended by suppliers from Saudi Arabia and the UAE.

“With growing supplies, it may soon become a buyer's market where Iran would look at giving concessions including deferred payments with a long tenure, even if not as high as 90 days, and even discounts to compete with other suppliers,” said a former executive with a state-run oil refiner. This outlook is supported by International Energy Agency (IEA) projections that global crude oil supply is set to rebound by 8 million barrels per day (bpd) next year.

Operational and Geopolitical Hurdles Experts note that while the waiver is positive, payment remains the biggest hurdle. Until 2011, purchases were settled through the Asian Clearing Union, which has since been discontinued. While the OFAC notification allows for US dollar-denominated payments, refiners remain cautious.

Tehran has already begun signalling its intent to compete more aggressively. Iran cut its July crude oil premium for Asia to $7.15 a barrel above the Oman/Dubai benchmark average, a sharp drop from the $13 premium charged in June.

The lifting of sanctions comes at a critical time as the US has warned of fresh sanctions on Russian oil, currently India's largest supplier. Iranian supplies could provide a much-needed diversification for India, which imports roughly 90% of its crude requirement. However, the durability of the US-Iran deal remains a concern due to deep levels of mistrust between the two sides.

The indirect cost of scanty rains

By Harsha Jethmalani

The south-west monsoon, which accounts for nearly 70% of India’s annual rainfall, got off to a sluggish start amid El Niño conditions, raising risks for crops, prices, and rural demand. During 1–23 June, cumulative rainfall was 42% below the long-period average, according to the India Meteorological Department. The spatial distribution is also worrying, with broad-based deficiency, and central India is the worst affected.

Weak and uneven rainfall in key sowing states raises risks to kharif crop output, given that much of the sowing takes place in July. A delayed and deficient monsoon can hit reservoir levels, food inflation, rural incomes, and consumption. Given their weight in the retail inflation basket, high food and fuel prices tend to compound inflation pressures.

India has faced El Niño-led rainfall shortages in the past. “In FY15 and FY16, India had a large monsoon deficit of 12% and 14%, respectively, cutting kharif crop output by 2.3% in FY16,” said Gaura Sen Gupta, chief economist at IDFC First Bank. However, consumer price index (CPI)-based food inflation eased to 4.9% in FY16 from 12.1% in FY14. Over time, the link between monsoon performance and food inflation has weakened, she said, aided by better government management of food supplies and minimum support price interventions.

The correlation between rainfall variability and economic growth has also weakened. A gradual shift from an agrarian to a services-led economy, expansion of irrigated land, stronger food stock buffers, and improved reservoir levels have all helped cushion the impact. Rajani Sinha, chief economist at CareEdge Ratings, said 13 of the 23 years since 1951–52 in which agricultural gross value added (GVA) declined occurred during El Niño years. But 20-year rolling regressions show a declining sensitivity of both agricultural and overall GVA growth to rainfall deviations, she added.

Still, there are indirect but sharper repercussions of poor rainfall that do not fully show up in headline inflation or GVA data. Higher food and fuel inflation can erode purchasing power and dampen consumption, particularly in rural areas. Tractors, entry-level passenger vehicles, motorcycles, fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG), consumer durables, and microfinance are among the most exposed. “Historical evidence suggests that these categories typically experience demand slowdowns during periods of elevated food inflation and weak monsoon conditions,” said a Motilal Oswal Financial Services report.

Amid El Niño conditions, which are also associated with higher temperatures, upside risks to food inflation are emerging from fruits and vegetables, particularly tomatoes, potatoes, and onions. Prices of cereals, pulses, oilseeds, and vegetables have already risen month-on-month in June. Against this backdrop, Bloomberg consensus estimates for FY27 retail inflation have risen from 4% at the beginning of the year to 4.9%. At its 5 June policy meeting, the RBI cut its FY27 growth projection to 6.6% from 6.9% and raised its inflation forecast to 5.1% from 4.6%. A prolonged El Niño into the second half of the year could also weigh on the rabi sowing season.

---

sidebar highlights:

• ripple effect: Higher food and fuel inflation can erode buying power, hit consumption, chiefly in rural areas.
• exposed sectors: Tractors, budget PVs, motorcycles, microfinance and FMCG are among the most vulnerable.
• Trouble brewing: Consensus estimates for India’s FY27 retail inflation are revised higher.
• Feeling the heat: Rural-focused product categories are more vulnerable to inflation-led consumption weakness.

How a crypto exchange became a hub for illicit Iranian cash

By Dylan Tokar and Will Briskin

Earlier this year, crypto sleuths found an alarming series of transactions tied to two digital wallets controlled by the Central Bank of Iran. Tracing backward, investigators discovered the wallet’s funds were linked to $1.5 billion that North Korean hackers stole from the crypto exchange Bybit. After reaching the Iranian wallets, the money flowed through a complex maze of transactions.

CoinEx, an 8-year-old exchange founded by a Chinese engineer, has played a growing role in connecting Iran’s crypto operations to the wider world, according to blockchain data. Since 2019, wallets with an identifiable link to Iran have moved more than $3.84 billion through CoinEx. The exchange operates largely outside the reach of the U.S. and connects Iran’s domestic economy to the global crypto ecosystem. CoinEx agreed to exit the U.S. market after being fined in 2023 by New York’s attorney general.

Based in the Seychelles, CoinEx maintains a transaction monitoring system and screens for high-risk users. Although it had been widely used by Iranians, the exchange stated it does not have a relationship with the Iranian government. Recently, the firm began taking steps to distance itself from the Iranian market, including blocking new users with Iranian IP addresses.

Digital assets are popular among everyday Iranians seeking to trade for profit and avoid the deterioration of the rial. Researchers estimate that around 13% of Iran’s population own cryptocurrency, participating in a market valued at $8 billion to $10 billion in 2025. CoinEx built a presence within Iran and at times employed business-development managers to recruit users, though the company denied knowingly hiring such personnel.

The U.S. has attempted to limit exchanges working with Iran, penalizing Binance in 2023 for allowing Iranian customers. While Binance's exposure fell as it improved controls, CoinEx replaced it by 2024 as the largest foreign counterparty to Nobitex, Iran's largest domestic crypto exchange. Nobitex was sanctioned by the Trump administration in June 2026 for allegedly supporting the Iranian government.

Wallets hosted by CoinEx also processed transactions for Alireza Derakhshan, an Iranian allegedly involved in a sanctioned oil sales network. Furthermore, money flowed through wallets attributed to Zedcex, an exchange connected to Babak Zanjani, a self-identified strategist for the Revolutionary Guard’s (IRGC) sanctions evasion operations. Treasury actions sanctioned both Derakhshan and Zanjani, though transactions involving CoinEx occurred before these actions.

Iran’s cryptocurrency market was severely disrupted in late February 2026 due to military attacks that prompted internet blackouts. Yet, during this period, the average size of transactions between CoinEx and Nobitex actually increased. CoinEx attributed its recent distancing from Iran to the "stakes getting higher" following the Nobitex sanctions. While TRM Labs analyzed over $763 million moving between the two entities last year, CoinEx disputed the aggregation of these volumes, stating that estimates from other providers were lower.

PSU banks asked to deepen rural reach

By Harsh Kumar New Delhi

The Union finance ministry has asked public sector banks (PSBs) to accelerate their rural expansion and ensure access in villages with a population of more than 3,000. This push to strengthen the rural presence of state-owned lenders is intended to protect their customer base as private banks, small finance banks, and digital financial service providers steadily expand beyond urban markets.

The focus is on ensuring that larger rural habitations remain adequately served by physical bank branches, which continue to play a critical role in deposit mobilization, lending, and the implementation of government welfare programmes.

Expansion Progress As part of this exercise, banks were tasked with opening 576 branches in villages with a population exceeding 3,000 during FY26. According to a government official, 511 of these branches have already been opened, while 65 are still waiting to become operational.

While India had roughly 640,000 villages according to the 2011 census (of which nearly 597,000 were inhabited), larger villages with populations above 3,000 serve as vital economic centres for surrounding areas and generate enough banking activity to support full branch operations.

The Importance of Physical Branches Despite the rapid growth of digital banking and UPI transactions, physical branches remain essential for deepening financial inclusion. "Rural customers continue to depend on branches for opening accounts, availing agricultural and retail loans, completing know-your-customer requirements, accessing government schemes and resolving service-related issues," a senior banking official noted.

For the banks, these areas remain a key source of low-cost deposits and a critical market for priority-sector lending. Experts, such as Charan Singh of the EGROW Foundation, believe the time to reap benefits from these investments is now, citing increasing rural prosperity driven by:

• Higher Minimum Support Prices (MSP).
• Direct transfer of resources to farmers and women.
• Government initiatives like PM Gramin Awas Yojana and programmes focused on fisheries, dairy, and animal husbandry.

How low-hanging fruit could give India outsized gains

By Puja Mehra & Arpita Mukherjee

The Iran conflict has made two things clear: One, a new wave of globalization is coming, like it or not, from which further such shocks can’t be ruled out; and two, dependable dollar inflows from export earnings need to grow handsomely.

In preparation of these new realities, India is striving to secure diverse export markets and integrate its economy into global supply chains. Besides obvious economic gains, this deepening of economic integration will also help increase India’s strategic choices, reduce risks and build leverage in geopolitical relations.

A good way of growing Indian exports is to reduce trade costs, which are very high at present, especially for small and medium enterprises (SMEs). India’s global ranking based on the Logistics Performance Index (LPI) has gone up from 44th in 2018 to 38th in 2023, while its score in the United Nations Global Survey on Digital and Sustainable Trade Facilitation (UNTF) has also improved. In cross-border paperless trade, India’s score rose from 28% in 2015 to 67% in 2021, but has stagnated since then; this calls for policy intervention.

Greater adoption of cross border paperless trade is the low-hanging fruit that can reduce trade costs by nearly 25%, according to UNESCAP (2025), resulting in significant gains in export competitiveness. The strategic imperative is even greater, perhaps. Countries like China and Republic of Korea are doing capacity building within the UN Cross-border Paperless Trade Agreement (CPTA) framework to help developing and least developed countries in setting up IT systems that can facilitate cross-border clearances, which India is missing out on. New Delhi had played a leadership role in designing that agreement.

India’s trade agreements have paperless trade provisions too. In practice, our trade facilitation regime has moved beyond basic compliances and can be characterized as TFA-plus. The World Trade Organization’s Trade Facilitation Agreement (TFA) took force in 2017 as its first multilateral pact. It encourages members to simplify and harmonize customs procedures, enable faster clearance of goods at borders, improve transparency and predictability in trade processes, and adopt e-trade systems. India ratified it in 2016 and has undertaken several reforms since to align its procedures with it.

Legal infrastructure is also taking shape. The Digital Trade Facilitation Bill of 2026 has proposed legal recognition of e-trade documents such that they are admissible as traditional paper trails. Legal legitimacy apart, it will align with the UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Transferable Records to allow cross-border e-bills of lading, e-bills of exchange, promissory notes and warehouse receipts, and also aid cross-border regulatory harmonization and document exchanges.

The Union budget for 2025-26 had announced a BharatTradeNet stack. This unified digital public infrastructure-based stack for international trade documentation and financing solutions is expected to integrate all stakeholders through an interoperable digital ecosystem. That will take care of the technical infrastructure needed to operationalize a single-window system at home that is interoperable with other e-trade platforms.

Indian Customs is modernizing its systems. Domestically, the country has fully implemented paperless-trade measures under the UNTF, reflecting much progress made in digitalization. The Indian Customs Electronic Data Interchange Gateway, Ice-gate, set up in 2007, serves as a central hub for all electronic interactions between Customs and traders. The department’s Single Window Interface for Facilitating Trade of India has been operational since 2016.

We would argue that by acceding to international frameworks such as the UN CPTA, India will be able to leverage its digital infrastructure and institutional capacity to make Asia-Pacific-wide gains. Even if some gaps remain, India can take more initiatives and push for cooperation on paperless trade with Customs in neighbouring countries like Sri Lanka or Bhutan. Customs in India and Bhutan can work on a pilot project for real-time sharing of data and information to help reduce trade anomalies and check informal trade.

There’s a business case for the Indian IT sector to make a bid for exporting trade-tech services to the Asia-Pacific region, potentially building a common platform across this geography seamlessly. In a security-wise uncertain environment, India’s interests will be served well if our technology firms can do that, as they are well placed to. Several elements of the architecture needed for digital trade, such as legal preparedness and technological interoperability with trade partners, are already in place.

How RBI’s new framework seeks to protect you from mis-selling by banks

It seeks to change how banks sell insurance, loans, investment products, both through branches, digital platforms

By Aprajita Sharma

Ahmedabad-based Ashok Parekh lost his 32-year-old daughter to cardiorespiratory arrest aggravated by covid pneumonitis. She had taken a home loan of ₹32 lakh from a private sector bank. "As far as I know, she was told to mandatorily buy an insurance policy that would take care of the outstanding loan amount if something happened to her. She paid ₹75,000 as premium for it," Parekh said.

After her death, Parekh approached the insurer only to discover that the policy was a critical illness cover and not a life insurance policy. Since cardiorespiratory arrest was not covered under the policy, the claim was rejected. "Most importantly, we were under the impression that the policy covered a death scenario. Why were we sold a policy by a health insurer rather than a life insurer?" he said.

The suitability of insurance has been the biggest casualty of the way banks sell it. Data from the Irdai Annual Report 2024-25 show that grievances related to Unfair Business Practices increased by nearly 14% year-on-year to 26,667 in FY25. The Reserve Bank of India (Commercial Banks— Responsible Business Conduct) Second Amendment Directions, 2026—issued this month—is important. It seeks to reshape how banks sell insurance, loans and investment products, via branches and digital platforms.

What the RBI framework says One of the most significant provisions is a crackdown on sales-linked incentives. Banks must ensure that their internal policies and compensation structures do not encourage employees to push unsuitable products. RBI has also asked banks to bar their employees from receiving any direct or indirect incentive from third-party product providers, such as insurers or mutual fund firms.

The framework also prohibits forced bundling. A bank cannot make the purchase of an insurance policy or any other third-party product a condition for sanctioning a loan. Even where insurance is required for risk mitigation, borrowers must be free to purchase it from an insurer of their choice.

To prevent customers from unknowingly purchasing add-on products, banks will have to obtain explicit consent through a signed declaration, OTP-based approval, or digitally recorded confirmation. Banks will also have to assess suitability based on factors such as age, income, financial literacy, and risk tolerance. If mis-selling is established, the bank will need to refund the full amount and compensate the customer for losses.

The regulator has also targeted dark patterns in banking apps and websites, such as pre-selected insurance add-ons and hidden charges. Telemarketing rules have been tightened as well, restricting contact to between 9 a.m. and 7 p.m. and requiring explicit consent for home or office visits.

A shift to accountability Banks have until 1 January 2027 to comply with the new framework. Lokanath P. Kar, founder of ElpeeCo, noted that the message from RBI is clear: banks should not view insurance primarily as a revenue-generating tool. Creating required audit trails will increase compliance costs, potentially forcing banks to shift from volume-driven sales to responsible selling.

---

RBI’s new rules against mis-selling by banks

What banks can no longer do:

• Force you to buy insurance, mutual funds or other products to get a loan.
• Push unsuitable products just to meet sales targets.
• Sell products without explicit customer consent.
• Use pre-selected add-ons, hidden charges or misleading digital prompts.
• Call or visit customers outside prescribed norms or ignore DND requests.
• Use dark patterns and deceptive app designs to dupe customers.

What banks must do:

• Obtain explicit consent through signed declarations, OTPs or recorded confirmations.
• Assess product suitability based on age, income, financial literacy and risk profile.
• Allow customers to choose products separately when multiple products are offered.
• Put in place a code of conduct for employees and sales agents.
• Maintain records showing what was disclosed and how consent was obtained.

What counts as mis-selling:

• Selling unsuitable financial products.
• Providing incomplete or misleading information.
• Selling without consent.
• Forced bundling of products.

Customer rights if mis-selling is established:

• Refund of the amount paid for the product.
• Compensation for losses as per bank policy.
• Stronger evidence requirements on banks to prove informed consent.

Careful planning can help India take on its inflation challenges

By Himanshu (Associate professor at Jawaharlal Nehru University and visiting fellow at the Centre de Sciences Humaines, New Delhi)

Not so long ago, the Indian economy was described by the finance ministry and the central bank as being in a ‘Goldilocks’ scenario, which is characterized by low inflation and high growth. The primary driver was a sustained period of low and declining inflation, which incidentally also led to higher real economic growth even though nominal growth had been decelerating. However, estimates of inflation in the last six months have placed a question mark on such claims.

Consumer price index (CPI) data released this month confirmed apprehensions of inflation trending higher. Overall inflation was reported at over 3.9% for May, with rural inflation at nearly 4.3% outpacing the 3.5% urban inflation rate. The trend in food inflation was worrying, with its rural measure almost at 4.9% and urban just short of 4.7%. In both, food inflation outpaced overall inflation. Some of this was expected, given our supply disruptions amid the West Asia war, but inflation stayed under the Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) 4% target. With the government passing on a limited rise in fuel prices, the transport sub-group saw an inflation rate of just 1.75%.

However, estimates of the wholesale price index (WPI) released for May show significantly higher inflation at 9.7%, with a rising trend since April’s 8.3%. The WPI series, like other statistical indicators, has been updated to base year 2022-23. Unlike the CPI data, its highest sub-group inflation rate was that for fuel at 30.3%. Wholesale food inflation was estimated at 4.5% but showed a faster rise than CPI estimates. What should worry policymakers is its sharp rise over the last six months; WPI inflation was a little over 1.7% in 2024-25, declining to 0.4% in 2025-26. Food inflation last fiscal year was -3.7%, a sharp drop from 7.5% the previous year.

What the CPI and WPI data confirm is that, first, the period until December 2025 was one of sustained low inflation. Second, a rise in inflation, including for food, was taking place even before the West Asia war started. And third, the significant divergence between WPI and CPI inflation in the last two months suggests inflationary pressures building up at the retail level.

A major challenge for the government is the anticipated increase in inflation as 2026-27 rolls on. While uncertainty over the West Asia war seems largely over, we still have to contend with supply shocks due to deficient monsoon rainfall amid a strengthening El Niño phenomenon. As of 23 June, rainfall was deficient by 43% compared to the long-term average—among the highest for June. The supply shocks from declining output will drive food inflation, and an extended period of high temperature could even hurt the rabi (winter) agricultural crop.

Another driving factor is the rise in input costs, already visible in energy prices at the wholesale level. Input energy costs will increase as farmers use more ground water for irrigation in the absence of adequate rainfall, and fertilizer shortages are likely to add to these costs.

The government’s challenge is not just to insulate the population from an inflationary surge, but also to ensure employment and growth. Given that pressures are driven by food prices, monetary policies are unlikely to be of help; what is required is to ensure an adequate supply of essential food items. Fortunately, crop output has been high in the last two years, helping the government enhance its buffer stocks. However, policymakers must also ensure income and livelihood support in rural regions and consider strengthening the country’s employment guarantee programme.

Newspaper Summary 260626

 In June 2026, corporate investment in India presents a complex landscape characterized by massive high-tech commitments from global giants, a surge in public market activities, and significant structural challenges regarding how capital is deployed across the broader economy.

Major Foreign and Domestic Commitments

Leading the investment narrative is Amazon, which announced an additional $13 billion investment in India, raising its total planned commitment to $48 billion by 2030. This capital is primarily directed toward boosting AI and cloud infrastructure through the expansion of AWS data centers in Mumbai and Hyderabad. The company aims to support 3.8 million jobs and enable $80 billion in e-commerce exports by 2030.

Other notable manufacturing and strategic investments include:

• Automotive & EVs: Horse Powertrain (a Geely-backed venture) is set to invest approximately $370 million in manufacturing hybrid engines for Renault and Nissan vehicles in India. Additionally, JSW Green Mobility has made a strategic investment in Lithium Urban Technologies to expand sustainable mobility solutions and charging infrastructure.
• Global Acquisitions: Tata Motors is executing an integration plan for its €3.8 billion acquisition of Iveco, aiming to create a global commercial vehicle group with combined annual revenues exceeding €22 billion.
• Electronics Scaling: Dixon Technologies is aggressively expanding its IT hardware manufacturing and backward integration into display and camera sub-assemblies through joint ventures with firms like Inventec and HKC.

Public Markets and IPO Momentum

The corporate sector is increasingly looking to public markets to fund expansion. Jio Platforms is preparing for one of the year’s largest IPOs, expected to raise roughly ₹35,000 crore. Other significant public offerings in the pipeline or recently cleared include Razorpay Software, Sathya Agencies, Torrent Gas, and Advit Jewels. Smaller entities like Aastha Spintex are also tapping the market to fund acquisitions and working capital.

Structural Challenges: The "Efficiency of Scarcity"

Despite these high-profile successes, the sources highlight a troubling trend in the quality of investment. India’s Incremental Capital Output Ratio (ICOR) has risen from 3-4 in the mid-2000s to 5-6 today, meaning each rupee of investment now generates about one-third less growth.

• Defensive Capex: Analysis suggests that in concentrated sectors like steel, cement, aviation, and telecom, capital is being deployed "defensively"—to build moats and protect margins rather than to expand output or "flood the zone" with supply.
• Pricing Power vs. Expansion: Instead of responding to demand by building more capacity, many large firms are managing scarcity and absorbing demand through higher pricing.
• MSME Constraints: While MSMEs are identified as the "growth engine" for India’s 2047 developed nation goal, they face an uphill battle. They borrow at rates 200-400 basis points higher than large firms and grapple with delayed payments that trap approximately ₹2-3 lakh crore in supply chains—capital that could otherwise fund expansion.

Policy-Driven Investment Frameworks

The government is attempting to direct corporate investment toward strategic self-reliance (Atmanirbharta) through targeted schemes:

• Rare Earth Magnets: A ₹7,280 crore scheme is designed to establish domestic manufacturing of rare earth permanent magnets, crucial for EVs and wind turbines, to reduce 90% dependence on Chinese imports.
• Biofuels: Trials for a 2% isobutanol-diesel blend are underway, with estimates suggesting that retrofitting a single distillery for production requires a capital expenditure of ₹140 crore.
• Regional Incentives: The West Bengal budget has introduced ₹5,000 crore in investment incentives and proposed a new semiconductor plant in Durgapur to attract industry back to the state.

In June 2026, India’s financial markets and IPO landscape are characterized by record-breaking public offerings, a significant shift toward the financialization of retail savings, and a complex interplay between domestic liquidity and global macroeconomic pressures.

IPO Momentum and Regulatory Oversight

The primary market is witnessing massive activity, led by Jio Platforms, which is expected to raise approximately ₹35,000 crore in what could be one of the year’s largest IPOs. However, the market regulator, SEBI, is maintaining strict oversight, recently seeking clarifications on draft prospectuses from both Jio and the fintech giant Razorpay Software.

Other notable IPO developments include:

• Cleared Offerings: SEBI has recently greenlit public issues for Sathya Agencies (seeking ₹600 crore), Kanohar Electricals, and Torrent Gas.
• Surging Retail Interest: Smaller issues are seeing extraordinary demand. Advit Jewels’ ₹165-crore IPO was subscribed 212 times, receiving bids worth nearly ₹24,600 crore.
• Successful Listings: Waterways Leisure Tourism (Cordelia Cruises) successfully completed its ₹585-crore IPO despite late-stage pressure on its institutional portion.
• Future Pipelines: Companies like Milky Mist are preparing for upcoming IPOs, with management focusing on building financial credibility and "clean books" to win over analysts.
• Tata Sons Listing Debate: Under new RBI "Upper Layer" NBFC criteria (for firms with assets >₹1 lakh crore), Tata Sons, with an asset size of ₹1.75 lakh crore, may be mandated to list by September 2025 unless it successfully de-registers as a core investment company.

Secondary Market Performance and Macro Context

The secondary markets recorded their longest winning streak in seven months in June 2026, ending in the green for three consecutive weeks.

• Benchmarks: The Sensex closed at 77,100.47 and the Nifty 50 at 24,056 as of late June, though midcap and smallcap indices saw slight declines.
• Macro Tailwinds: A significant driver for the market has been a 37% crash in crude oil prices from May peaks, which experts describe as the "biggest macro tailwind of 2026".
• Domestic Resilience: Despite high FII outflows and global political instability (particularly in West Asia), the active participation of domestic institutional and retail investors has stabilized the Indian market.

Market Reforms and Financial Infrastructure

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) is actively working to deepen participation in the debt and money markets:

• Retail G-Secs via Demat: To make the debt market more vibrant, the RBI plans to allow retail investors to trade Government Securities (G-Secs) through their existing demat accounts, with a minimum transaction size of ₹10,000. This bypasses the need for the less-popular "Retail Direct Gilt" accounts.
• Money Market Liquidity: The central bank has proposed new master directions to enhance liquidity in term money markets and expand the participant base.
• GIFT City Growth: New investment vehicles are emerging, such as a $60 million Category III AIF launched by Areion Group in GIFT City to focus on distressed assets and special situations.

The "Efficiency of Scarcity" Challenge

While markets are vibrant, analysis within the sources warns of a structural "invisible drag." India’s Incremental Capital Output Ratio (ICOR) has risen to 5-6, up from 3-4 in the mid-2000s. This suggests that while capital is being raised through IPOs and investments, it is often being deployed "defensively" to protect margins and manage scarcity—particularly in concentrated sectors like steel, cement, and aviation—rather than to flood the market with new supply to drive 8% GDP growth.

In June 2026, the growth of Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) and the broader industrial sector is framed as the linchpin for India’s ambition to become a $32 trillion developed economy by 2047. While the sector is lauded for its agility and potential to drive a substantial rise in per capita income, it faces structural "invisible drags" and a pressing need to move from low-value assembly to high-value intellectual property (IP) creation.

The Developed Nation Ambition and MSMEs

Industry leaders at the businessline MSME Growth Conclave emphasized that MSMEs are the real "growth engine" of India.

• The Per Capita Income Challenge: To achieve developed status, India must raise its per capita income from current levels ($2,200) to $20,000–25,000. MSMEs are seen as more critical than large enterprises in this transformation due to their ability to innovate rapidly.
• Shift in Philosophy: There is a strong call to move beyond "Made in India" to "Designed, Engineered, and Owned in India". This involves MSMEs evolving from contract manufacturers into creators of products, patents, and globally recognized brands.

Industrial Growth: The "Efficiency of Scarcity" Challenge

Despite heavy investment, a critical analysis within the sources suggests India is "investing enough for 8% growth but getting 6%" due to a rise in the Incremental Capital Output Ratio (ICOR) from 3–4 in the mid-2000s to 5–6 today.

• Market Power over Output: In concentrated sectors like steel, cement, and aviation, large firms are allegedly deploying capital "defensively" to protect margins and manage scarcity rather than expanding supply.
• Barriers to Entry: Manufacturing entry rates have dropped below 5%, with incumbents controlling distribution and logistics, making it harder for new MSMEs to scale.
• Working Capital Trap: Delayed payments from large buyers trap approximately ₹2–3 lakh crore within supply chains, capital that could otherwise fund MSME expansion.

Strategic Sector Focus: Electronics and Self-Reliance

The electronics industry is targeted to reach $500 billion by 2030, with $400 billion in finished products and $100 billion in components.

• Moving Up the Value Chain: Experts noted that while India assembles iPhones, it often retains only 5% of the value. The goal is to upskill 100 million people over the next 5–10 years to bridge the productivity gap with China.
• Indigenisation Schemes: The government is pushing for self-reliance (Atmanirbharta) through initiatives like the ₹7,280 crore Rare Earth Permanent Magnet (REPM) scheme, aimed at establishing domestic manufacturing for EV and aerospace components to reduce dependence on Chinese imports.

MSME Bottlenecks and Enablers

• The Talent Crunch: MSMEs struggle with worker retention, often serving as "training grounds" for talent that is later poached by larger firms with deeper pockets. Practical, AI-led skilling is proposed as a solution to enhance productivity without massive hiring.
• Financial Constraints: MSMEs borrow at rates 200–400 basis points higher than large firms. While initiatives like the SBI Koramangala start-up branch have sanctioned ₹1,200 crore in collateral-free loans, 85% of units still rely on informal credit.
• Digital Integration: The digital sector now contributes 13% to the national economy, with Karnataka leading at 35–40%. Amazon’s newly announced $13 billion top-up investment aims to digitize 15 million small businesses by 2030.

Success Case: Milky Mist

The journey of Milky Mist serves as a template for MSME growth, moving from a milk trading business to a highly automated, organized brand preparing for an IPO. The company’s success was built on early investments in technology and owning the entire "farm to fork" cold chain, demonstrating that building scale does not require moving to metro hubs.

In June 2026, government policy and regulation in India are heavily focused on achieving the "Viksit Bharat 2047" goal by fostering self-reliance (Atmanirbharta), modernizing financial and physical infrastructure, and addressing structural inefficiencies in the industrial sector.

Industrial Policy and Self-Reliance

The government is utilizing targeted incentive schemes to build domestic capacity in high-tech and strategic sectors:

• Rare Earth Permanent Magnets (REPM): A ₹7,280 crore scheme provides capital subsidies and sales-linked incentives to establish integrated manufacturing facilities for these magnets, which are critical for EVs and wind turbines. The policy aims to reduce 90% import dependence on China.
• Biofuels: Moving beyond unsuccessful ethanol-diesel attempts, the government is backing 2% isobutanol-diesel blend trials for commercial vehicles. This collaborative initiative between multiple ministries and industry players is viewed as a vital step toward energy independence.
• Defense Indigenisation: The Ministry of Defence is intervening to help private players convert idle explosive licenses into manufacturing plants to meet ammunition needs for long-term warfare, aiming for 100% self-sufficiency.

Financial and Market Regulation

Regulatory bodies are shifting toward a more transparent, "brightline" test approach to minimize subjectivity:

• RBI and NBFCs: New "Upper Layer" (UL) criteria for NBFCs with assets exceeding ₹1 lakh crore have been finalized. This regulation may mandate the listing of major entities like Tata Sons unless they successfully deregister as core investment companies.
• Deepening Debt Markets: To attract retail participation, the RBI is mulling a demat route for Government Securities (G-Secs), allowing individual transactions with a minimum of ₹10,000.
• SEBI Oversight: The markets regulator maintains a rigorous vetting process for high-profile IPOs, recently seeking clarifications from Jio Platforms and Razorpay Software despite the overall market momentum.

Trade and Customs Reforms

Customs policy is transitioning from a revenue-generating tool to a frontline instrument for supply chain resilience:

• Customs Modernization: The introduction of a "trusted importer" framework aims to accelerate cargo clearance through simplified procedures and paperless approvals.
• India-US Trade Deal: New Delhi is adopting a cautious stance, convincing Washington to wait for clarity on US Section 301 investigations and tariff structures to ensure India gains a genuine "meaningful market-access advantage" before sealing an interim deal.

Legislative and State-Level Initiatives

• Food Security Reform: The Centre has proposed a significant restructuring of the National Food Security Act, moving from a household-based fixed entitlement to a per-capita entitlement of 7 kg a month to remove inequities within the system.
• West Bengal’s Industrial Pivot: Following a landmark election win, the state's ₹4.38 lakh crore budget promises ₹5,000 crore in investment incentives and a re-examination of the Urban Land Act to attract industries back to the state.
• The "Right to Walk": A landmark Supreme Court ruling has designated access to well-maintained footpaths as a fundamental right under the Right to Life (Article 21), forcing a policy re-evaluation of pedestrian infrastructure in congested cities.

Administrative Efficiency

The Cabinet Secretariat has issued new directives to enhance government productivity, advising against holding complex or important meetings around holidays or lunch hours to ensure maximum participation and "tangible takeaways". This is part of a broader effort to reduce stress and improve official output through better time management.

In June 2026, India’s energy and logistics sectors are undergoing significant transformations driven by a mix of geopolitical stabilization, a renewed push for energy independence through advanced biofuels, and structural reforms aimed at lowering the costs of moving goods and people.

Energy: Normalization and Strategic Shifts

The energy landscape is marked by a transition from crisis management to long-term security and diversification.

• Normalization of Fuel Supplies: Following a peace pact between the US and Iran, the Centre has removed all sectoral restrictions on liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) supply to commercial and industrial sectors. Previously, supply had been curtailed by 30% due to the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a critical choke point for half of India's LPG requirements.
• India-Iran Energy Diplomacy: Amidst a 60-day US sanctions reprieve for Iran, Indian Oil Minister Hardeep Singh Puri met his Iranian counterpart to explore renewed crude oil and LPG imports. Iran has already regained a foothold, with its share of India’s LPG imports rising from 1.6% in 2025 to 6.5% by May 2026.
• Breakthrough in Biofuels: India has pivoted from unsuccessful ethanol-diesel attempts to validating a 2% isobutanol-diesel blend for commercial vehicles. This initiative is viewed as a vital step toward "energy independence". However, scaling this requires significant capital; retrofitting a single distillery for bio-isobutanol production is estimated to cost roughly ₹140 crore.
• Power Exports: Adani Power confirmed that its Godda plant in Jharkhand continues stable power exports to Bangladesh, with the neighboring country actively clearing outstanding dues.

Logistics: Efficiency and Infrastructure Modernization

Logistics is being repositioned as a "frontline instrument of economic resilience" rather than just a backend administrative function.

• Customs and Trade Facilitation: The government has introduced a "trusted importer" framework to accelerate cargo clearance through simplified procedures and reduced physical inspections. These reforms aim to reduce detention and storage costs, which disproportionately affect smaller firms.
• The Multimodal Imperative: There is a pressing need to shift long-haul freight from road to rail and water. NCAER data highlights a stark cost disparity: road freight costs ₹3.78 per tonne-km, whereas rail costs ₹1.96 and inland waterways cost ₹2.30. Despite this, road transport remains dominant due to inadequate last-mile connectivity and inconsistent rail transit times.
• Aviation Hub Strategy: Delhi’s IGI Airport has introduced a hub-and-spoke model, allowing international passengers from tier-2 and tier-3 cities (like Varanasi) to complete customs and immigration at their originating airport. This model aims to position Indian airports as global transit hubs and reduce reliance on foreign hubs in West or South Asia.
• Sustainable Mobility: The logistics of moving people is also shifting, evidenced by JSW Green Mobility's strategic investment in Lithium Urban Technologies, an integrated platform managing over 25,000 daily EV trips.

Strategic Self-Reliance (Atmanirbharta)

Energy and logistics are being tied directly to national security and manufacturing independence.

• Rare Earth Permanent Magnets (REPM): To support the EV and wind turbine sectors, the government is pushing a ₹7,280 crore scheme to establish domestic integrated manufacturing of these magnets, aiming to break the 90% dependency on Chinese imports.
• Maritime Infrastructure: The Mumbai Port Authority is expanding its liquid bulk cargo capacity with a ₹800 crore sixth berth specifically designed to handle petroleum tankers, further supporting national energy security.
• Supply Chain Integrity: New mandates require QR codes on 300 drug brands, including vaccines and anti-cancer medicines, to ensure traceability and prevent counterfeit products from entering the supply chain.

In June 2026, India’s international trade and relations are defined by a strategic "wait-and-watch" approach to major trade deals, renewed energy diplomacy following geopolitical stabilization in West Asia, and a aggressive push to move up the global manufacturing value chain.

India-US Trade Negotiations

New Delhi has adopted a cautious stance regarding its interim bilateral trade deal with Washington, successfully convincing the US to delay finalization until various tariff issues are resolved.

• Seeking Competitive Advantage: Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal asserted that India will not sign the deal until it is assured a "meaningful market-access advantage" over rival competitors.
• Regulatory Uncertainty: India is seeking clarity on future US tariffs under the Trump regime, particularly the outcomes of Section 301 investigations regarding forced labor and excess industrial capacity.
• Changing Equations: The legal invalidation of certain US reciprocal tariffs has changed the negotiating framework, making older commitments unacceptable to India without technical resolution.

Energy Diplomacy and Geopolitical Shifts

Geopolitical developments in West Asia have directly impacted India’s energy security and trade policies.

• Normalization with Iran: Following a peace pact between the US and Iran, the Indian government lifted all sectoral restrictions on LPG supply that were previously curtailed due to the closure of the Strait of Hormuz.
• Surging Hydrocarbon Imports: India is actively exploring renewed crude oil and refined product imports from Iran. Iran’s share of India’s LPG imports rose significantly from 1.6% in early 2025 to 6.5% by May 2026.
• BRICS Cooperation: At the 11th BRICS Energy Ministers’ meeting hosted by India, member nations reaffirmed that diversified and resilient energy supply chains are fundamental to global economic development.

Strategic Foreign Investment and Global Acquisitions

India continues to attract massive foreign capital while domestic firms are expanding their global footprint.

• Amazon’s Commitment: Amazon announced an additional $13 billion investment, bringing its total planned commitment to $48 billion by 2030. This investment is designed to enable $80 billion in e-commerce exports and boost India’s AI and cloud infrastructure.
• Relaxation for Bordering Countries: In a notable shift, India is set to approve a $370 million investment from Horse Powertrain (a Geely-backed venture), marking a significant manufacturing commitment from a Chinese-linked entity following the relaxation of rules for investments from bordering nations.
• Tata-Iveco Integration: Tata Motors is executing a roadmap for its €3.8 billion acquisition of Iveco, aiming to create a global commercial vehicle group withcombined annual revenues exceeding €22 billion and expanded dealer networks in Europe and Latin America.

Trade Policy and Supply Chain Resilience

Customs policy has transitioned from a mere revenue-generating tool to a frontline instrument for supply chain stabilization.

• Trusted Importer Framework: The government has introduced a new framework to accelerate cargo clearance through simplified procedures and automation, aimed at reducing detention and storage costs for businesses.
• Reducing Import Dependence: There is a critical focus on breaking dependencies in high-tech sectors. For example, a ₹7,280 crore scheme for Rare Earth Permanent Magnets aims to establish domestic manufacturing to counter China’s 90% dominance in the sector.
• Value-Addition Challenge: Industry experts emphasize the need to move beyond "Made in India" assembly to "Designed, Engineered, and Owned in India". In the electronics sector, where India aims for a $500 billion target by 2030, observers noted that India often retains only 5% of the value of products like iPhones despite assembling them for the world.

Global Macroeconomic Pressures

International economic conditions continue to influence the domestic economy.

• Currency and Commodities: A strong US dollar and expectations of US Fed rate hikes have driven gold and silver prices to 8-month lows.
• Tech Supply Chain Shocks: A global memory chip shortage, driven by the expansion of AI data centers, has forced international brands like Apple to hike product prices in India by 15-20%.
• Regional Power Trade: Adani Power confirmed that electricity exports to Bangladesh remain commercially stable, with the neighboring country clearing outstanding dues through improved collection mechanisms.